Answer: The Neutral Ground along the border of the United States with Spanish Texas was established as a place where neither country's military would engage. ... After the Louisiana Purchase of 1803 the United States and Spain were unable to agree on the boundary between Louisiana and Texas.Nov 5, 2015
Explanation:
Do you think the Embargo Act was a smart idea? Why or why not?
President Thomas Jefferson hoped that the Embargo Act of 1807 would help the United States by demonstrating to Britain and France their dependence on American goods, convincing them to respect American neutrality and stop impressing American seamen. Instead, the act had a devastating effect on American trade.
With the embargo in place, American exports declined by 75%, and imports declined by 50%—the act did not completely eliminate trade and domestic partners. Before the embargo, exports to the United States reached $108 million. One year later, they were just over $22 million.
The Articles of Confederation proved ineffective as a national body laws for which of the following reasons?
Group of answer choices
It gave too much power to the Congress and the president
It imposed taxes that citizens found offensive
It did not give the federal government enough power to effectively lead
Slave owners would have more votes than non-slave owners
Answer:
It did not give the federal government enough power to effectively lead and It imposed taxes that citizens found offensive
Which statement best describes the way early French settlers interacted with American Indians?
They formed united governments with American Indians who shared their land.
They were known to be friendly traders with American Indian groups
They conquered the local American Indians and enslaved them
O They rarely came into contact with American Indian groups
Pls hurry up i need help!
Answer:
It's Number 1
Explanation:
The french and indians had a very positive relationship... Some french even married the indian women that they had met. The french had good trades with the natives and respected them.
How did Roosevelt’s policies affect the enviroment
I need help! What were the primary reasons for the fall of rome? dbq essay is due friday
I'll give someone a brainliest.
It needs to be a 5 paragraph essay with evidence from documents.
Here are the three primary reasons: political assassinations, military problems, and natural disasters/ diseases.
Answer:
I'll help.yoy.when I get on pc but...
Explanation:
8 Reasons Why Rome Fell
Invasions by Barbarian tribes. ...
Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor. ...
The rise of the Eastern Empire. ...
Overexpansion and military overspending. ...
Government corruption and political instability. ...
The arrival of the Huns and the migration of the Barbarian tribes.
Which statements accurately describe Magellan’s expedition?
Choose all answers that are correct.
A) The expedition was successful-it reached the indies by sailing west.
B) The expedition did not conduct trade along the way.
C) Magellan was killed when he tried to enslave the inhabitants of the Spice Islands.
D) Magellan found a strait that led through the southern tip of South America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
Answers:
The expedition was successful–it reached the Indies by sailing west.Magellan found a strait that led through the southern tip of South America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific.Proof ( from K12 ):
( Down below!! )[ I hope this helps!!! ]
-GXLDIE <3
Answer:
A) The expedition was successful-it reached the indies by sailing west.
:D) Magellan found a strait that led through the southern tip of South America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
Which piece of legislation was passed by Congress in 1887 to force American Indians to
become farmers?
Answer:
The Dawes Act (sometimes called the Dawes Severalty Act or General Allotment Act), passed in 1887 under President Grover Cleveland, allowed the federal government to break up tribal lands by partitioning them into individual plots. Only those Native Americans who accepted the individual allotments were allowed to become US citizens.
Explanation:
4. Which of the following Amendments allows citizens to own weapons and organize state militias?
Eighth Amendment
Second Amendment
Fifth Amendment
First Amendment
The Second Amendment allows citizens to own weapons and organize state militias. Option B is the correct answer.
According to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, "a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which contains the first ten amendments to the Constitution.
The Second Amendment guarantees the right of individuals to own firearms while simultaneously recognising the significance of a well-regulated militia for state protection. It ensures people' freedom to bear arms and provides the notion that this right should not be violated by the government. Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.
For such more question on Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/20336789
#SPJ8
If the unemployment rate is low what happens to prices of goods and services. Do they increase, decrease, or stay the same? Explain your reasoning. 
Based on economic theory, when the unemployment rate is low, the prices of goods and services decrease.
During the rise in unemployment, many people have little money to buy goods and services. This, in turn, would lead to a decrease in demand.
As demand decreases, the price of goods and services would decrease to adjust to the quantity demanded.
This situation is based on the law of demand and supply relative to their quantities.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the unemployment rate would affect the price of goods and services in society.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24565414
why did germans come to america during industrial revolution
Answer: to escape economic hardship.
Explanation:
what are the advantages and disadvantages of federal financing
Answer:
Public funding are funds or resources provided by the State/Government for political parties and/or candidates. Provisions often state that political parties and candidates should have an equitable access to public funds. Oftentimes, the rules regarding public funding are not clearly stated in law, and even if they are, there is often a (real or perceived) misuse of public resources by the incumbent party or candidate. The legal framework can be drafted in a way as to encourage the founding and sustainability of a multi-party system. Ongoing oversight from a responsible government body combined with public (civil society) oversight through CSO watchdog capacity also can improve the monitoring and full disclosure of funding across party lines and in lines and consistent with the intent of full disclosure and fairness in campaign financing.[1]
Depending on the form in which public resources are made available, public funding is divided into direct public funding or indirect public funding.
Direct public funding is given to political parties and/or candidates in the form of money – usually as bank transfers but at times in cash or cheque.
Indirect public funding is when resources with a monetary value is provided by the Government to political parties and/or candidates.
Arguments against public funding
Those who oppose public funds to political parties or candidates often use one or several of the following arguments:
Public funding increases the distance between political elites (party leadership, candidates) and ordinary citizens (party members, supporters, voters)
When political parties and candidates do not depend on their supporters or members neither for monetary contributions (membership, donations) nor for voluntary labour, they might be less likely to involve them in party decisions or consult their opinions on policy issues.
Public funding preserves a status quo that keeps the established parties and candidates in power
Public funds are often allocated among political parties and candidates in the national legislature. This may make it more difficult for new political forces to gain representation. The legal framework can limit this negative influence by providing special funds for new political parties or candidates.
Through public funds, taxpayers are forced to support political parties and candidates whose views they do not share
Many believe that ordinary taxpayers should not be forced – through the public purse – to support political parties or candidates that they would never choose to vote for. Instead they should have the possibility to decide if and when they want to donate money to a political party or candidate.
Public funds to political parties and candidates takes money away from schools and hospitals to give to rich politicians
When introduced, public funding is often unpopular among the public. Public resources are scarce and needed for everything from schools and hospitals to roads and salaries for staff. To many people, using public funds to give to political parties and candidates would be far down their list of priorities.
Political parties and candidates both take the decision and collect the money
The decision to allocate public funds to parties and candidates is most often taken in the national legislature (or in some cases in the Government). This means that the political parties and candidates who will collect the money, also take the decision.
Political parties risk becoming organs of the State rather than parts of civil society
If all or a substantial amount of the party income comes directly from the State rather than from voluntary sources, political parties risk losing their independence and become organs of the State, thereby losing their ties to the civil society.
Who does each argument support? Madison or Marbury?
1. Article III states that Congress can make exceptions to which cases have original
jurisdiction in the Courts. The case falls under original jurisdiction of the Supreme
Court.
2. The appointment of Marbury to his position was invalid because his commission was
not delivered before the expiration of Adams’ term as president.
1. This argument was supported by Marbury.
2. This argument was supported by Madison.
Marbury v. Madison is a Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, one of the cornerstones of constitutional law in the United States.
This trial was originated as William Marbury was appointed District Judge of the District of Columbia in 1801 by then-President John Adams one day before his resignation. At the same time, a large number of judges were appointed to other courts in the country, when John Adams, as leader of the Federalist Party, sought to skew the balance in the judiciary of the incoming Democratic-Republican Party.
Incumbent President Thomas Jefferson refused to carry out these appointments. Marbury therefore sought enforcement of the decision from then-Secretary of State James Madison through a so-called writ of mandamus.
Learn more in https://brainly.com/question/3644411
After determining that someone has had to much to drink , there are eight steps you should take to cut someone off . What is the first step
Answer:
verify your observations
Explanation:
Why did Arabic script become popular in West Africa?
Answer:
It was the main form of communication for Muslim traders.
What did Rutherford B Hayes have to agree to do as President in the
Compromise of 1877? *
Appoint a Southerner to his Cabinet
Spent federal $$ to help rebuilt the South
Remove federal troops from the South
All of the above
Answer:
your answer is A
Explanation:
Hayes would also have to agree to name a leading southerner to his cabinet and to support federal aid for the Texas and Pacific Railroad, a planned transcontinental line via a southern route.
Plz help! Due tonight!
Which branch has more power with respect to controlling the military? Explain your answer.
Answer:
the Congress
Explanation:
What is probable cause and how does it affect what police officers can and cannot do?
Answer:
you have reasonable suspicion that that individual has committed a crime
Explanation:
if a store keeper says they were robbed by a caucasion Male wearing a red checkered shirt and blue jeans and white shoes . you have probable cause to stop, detain and identify the person. they can't stop everyone but they can use this description as a way of possibly identifying the thief
explain in at LEAST 2 sentences what the constitutional principle means.
Answer:
A sad day for the separation of powers. The separation of powers by which civil society defines itself simply does not exist. He pretends to admire bipartisanship and the separation of powers but really hates both. The separation of powers was designed precisely to create sturdy firewalls against democratic wildfires.
We will have checks and balances, and the president will be accountable. The new Constitution also introduced decisive checks and balances to presidential power. We like the notion of continued checks and balances on state government.
Explanation:
Answer: It outlines the framework and procedures of the government and sets limits on governmental power. These are the principles of popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and federalism.
Explanation:
By 1910, the dictator Porfirio Díaz had ruled Mexico for almost 35 years, winning reelection as president again and again. On the surface, Mexico enjoyed peace and economic growth . . . However, underneath the surface, discontent rippled through Mexico.
Which of the following is a fact that supports the statement above?
Answer:
Peasants in Mexico did not benefit from Mexico's economic growth.
Explanation:
In the Declaration of Independence document, Jefferson states that "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...."
What is its importance to our way of governance in this country to this day?
Corporate governance important because it creates a system of rules and practices determine how a company operates and how it aligns the interest of all stakeholders.
....pls
Which event occurred during the Homestead Strike?
The managers of the steel mill sent guards to violently attack the strikers.
Carnegie sold all of his steel mills to a foreign investor.
The managers of the steel mill gave in to all the strikers' demands.
The steel mill was burned down by strikers.
Answer:
The managers of the steel mill sent guards to violently attack the strikers.
Explanation:
The Homestead Strike began in 1892 was a result of the conflict between one of the most powerful corporations Carnegie Steel Company and trade union named Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers. It resulted in a massacre when private guards hired by the steel company came into blood_y conflict with the strikers, resulted in loss of life of nine strikers and seven guards.
Answer:
The answer is B. I got 100% on the test.
Explanation:
(1 point
3. Why is the necessary and proper clause in the Constitution sometimes called the “elastic
clause"?
O It stretched the power of the Supreme Court.
OIt can stretch the powers of Congress.
It is used to stretch the powers of the president.
It stretches the power of the states.
Answer:
it stretches the power of the states
The necessary and proper clause in the Constitution sometimes called the “elastic clause" is It stretches the power of the states. Thus the correct option is D.
What is a constitution?A constitution is a fundamental document that defines rules and regulations, laws and legislation as well as the power and authority of the government to conduct the functioning of any country.
The difficulty to list all the functions of government presented the architects of the Constitution with their first immediate challenge. They were aware that the world would soon alter.
The power to create all laws necessary and appropriate for carrying out the aforementioned powers and all other powers granted to the United States government, or any department or officer thereof, by this Constitution belongs to Congress.
The Necessary and Proper Clause, also referred to as the Elastic Clause, permits Congress to pass laws in areas that aren't expressly covered by the Constitution.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about Constitution, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ7
Why did the United States transform from a rural to an urban country between 1865 and 1932?
Answer:
Since the birth rate in the US declined in the late nineteenth century, the growth in the urbans reflected an internal migration of American from farms and small towns, larger cities, and even the overseas migration that brought millions of people to the US shores. It used to be a small rural country, but after the growth in population rose a lot, it became an urban country.
Explanation:
What is the difference between Britain and British ?
Answer:
Britain is a country and British is the language or people of Britain, like United States and American
Why did the Founding Fathers create a federal system of government instead of a unitary system? To make elections more fair. To protect themselves from an all-powerful central government. To take away rights from the states, To give every American the right to vote. Previous Next
Answer: a
Explanation:
To protect themselves from an all-powerful central government.
What is the connection between the Asian-Americans rights movement and the black power movement?
they are all fighting for their freedom and rights to be treated equally in today's society this is what i think
Part A You identified the three main qualities of a good leader in the previous task. You also identified a historical figure that you believe was a great leader for the time. Think about what this person would be like if he or she lived today. First, look at list of some modern characteristics of a leader. Compare the qualities and characteristics of the historical leader you chose to this list. Then identify any characteristics that match your leader and explain why you think they do. Font Sizes
Answer:
a good leader is Martin Luther King J.R.
Explanation:
Explain whether the Congress of Vienna was successful in its goals?
Explanation:
The Congress of Vienna was a success because the congress got a balance of power back to the European countries. The congress also brought back peace among the nations. Europe had peace for about 40 years. ... Yes, because in the end, they did many things that benefited France such as maintain a balance of power in France.
what is the meaning of the proverb"still waters run deep"
sorry de ko po alam answer
Explanation:
sorry po
How did race play a role in American foreign policy
Answer:
Well, racism did shape who lived where for a while.
Explanation:
Like, there was this racist thing passed on by a politician that...