Internal economies of scale:Internal economies of scale refers to the cost advantages a business enjoys due to its scale of operation. It implies that the bigger the business, the cheaper it becomes to manufacture a product or deliver a service. It is particularly relevant in international economics because countries can only achieve economies of scale by exploiting their comparative advantage in the production of certain goods and services. The significance of internal economies of scale lies in the fact that it fosters global trade and integration, encouraging countries to specialize in producing goods in which they have a competitive advantage.
A carbon tariff:A carbon tariff refers to a tax imposed on imported products from countries with inadequate environmental regulations. This levy is levied to encourage global production patterns that have less impact on the environment. The carbon tariff can serve as an incentive to improve the environmental standards of goods produced abroad, but it can also act as a form of protectionism. Thus, a carbon tariff's significance in international economics depends on the underlying motivation of its introduction. If it is solely to protect domestic producers, it will harm international relations.
Real exchange rate:The real exchange rate is an indicator of a country's competitiveness in international trade. It measures the relative purchasing power of one currency in relation to another. A country that has a favorable real exchange rate would be able to purchase more foreign goods for each unit of domestic currency it spends. Thus, the significance of the real exchange rate in international economics is that it measures the relative costs of trading with foreign countries. A country with a strong real exchange rate can import cheaper goods and services, making it more competitive in the global market.
Know more about Internal economies,here:
https://brainly.com/question/1132310
#SPJ11
Using the quantity equation of money MV = PQ, calculate the money supply (M) if velocity (M) equals 5. the price level (P) equals 112, and real GDP (Q) equals 132. Round to the nearest whole number Provide your answer below:
Rounding to the nearest whole number, the money supply (M) is approximately 2950.
Money supply refers to the total amount of money available in an economy at a given point in time. It includes all forms of money, such as cash, coins, and various types of bank deposits that can be readily used for transactions and as a medium of exchange. The money supply is a crucial measure that helps in understanding the overall liquidity and monetary conditions in an economy.
To calculate the money supply (M) using the quantity equation of money MV = PQ, we can rearrange the equation as follows:
M = PQ / V
Velocity (V) = 5
Price level (P) = 112
Real GDP (Q) = 132
Plugging in these values into the equation:
M = (132 * 112) / 5
M = 2950.4
To know more about money supply, here
https://brainly.com/question/30218160
#SPJ4
On January 1, 2020, Sitra Company leased equipment from National Corporation. Lease payments are lease is non-cancelable
The following information pertains to the agreement
1. The fair value of the equipment on January 1, 2020 is $2,550,000.
2. The estimated economic life of the equipment was 25 years on January 1, 2020 with guaranteed residual value of $75,000
3. The lease is non-renewable. At the termination of the lease, the equipment reverts to the lessor
4. The lessor's implicit rate is 10% which is known to Sitra Sitra's incremental borrowing rate is 12% (The PV of $1 for 20 periods at 10% is 0.14864 and the PV for an ordinary annuity of $1 for 20 periods at 10% is 8.51356)
To analyze the lease agreement between Sitra Company and National Corporation, we can calculate the present value of lease payments and determine the appropriate accounting treatment.
This is the correct answer calculations and necessary information:
Fair Value of Equipment: $2,550,000Estimated Economic Life: 25 yearsGuaranteed Residual Value: $75,000Lessor's Implicit Rate: 10%Sitra's Incremental Borrowing Rate: 12%To determine the present value of lease payments, we need to consider the lease term, annual lease payments, and the discount rate. In this case, the lease term is not provided, so let's assume it to be 25 years, matching the estimated economic life of the equipment.
To calculate the present value, we can use the present value of an ordinary annuity formula:
Present Value = Annual Lease Payment x Present Value Factor of an Ordinary Annuity
First, we calculate the present value factor of an ordinary annuity for 25 years at 10%:
Present Value Factor of an Ordinary Annuity = 1 - (1 / (1 + r)^n) / r
= 1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10)^25) / 0.10≈ 9.42677Next, we calculate the annual lease payment using the fair value of the equipment and the guaranteed residual value:
Total Lease Payments = Fair Value - Guaranteed Residual Value
= $2,550,000 - $75,000= $2,475,000Now, we can calculate the present value of the lease payments:
Present Value of Lease Payments = Annual Lease Payment x Present Value Factor of an Ordinary Annuity
= $2,475,000 x 9.42677≈ $23,278,399.25Based on the above calculations, the present value of the lease payments is approximately $23,278,399.25.
Regarding the accounting treatment, since the lease is non-cancelable and the present value of the lease payments exceeds 90% of the fair value of the equipment, Sitra Company should recognize the lease as a finance lease on its balance sheet. The leased equipment would be recorded as an asset, and a corresponding liability for the present value of the lease payments would be recognized.
It's important to note that additional information, such as lease term and specific terms and conditions of the lease agreement, may affect the analysis and accounting treatment. It's recommended to consult with a professional accountant or financial advisor for a comprehensive assessment.
About economyIn general, economics has an understanding as a science that studies how humans fulfill their life needs by using available resources. All forms of business and human effort in meeting the needs of life in order to obtain life welfare
Learn More About economy at brainly.com/question/28210218
#SPJ11
A property was purchased for $3894.00 down and payments of$1280.00 at the end of every year for 7 years. Interest is 10% per annum compounded monthly. What was the purchase price of theproperty? How much is the cost of financing?
A property was purchased for $3894.00 down and payments of$1280.00 at the end of every year for 7 years. Interest is 10% per annum compounded monthly. The purchase price of the property is $17,258.45 and the cost of financing is $8,393.45.
Here's how to solve the problem:
To find the purchase price of the property, we need to use the present value formula, which is: PV = [tex]FV / (1 + r/n)^{n*t} where PV is the present value, FV is the future value, r is the interest rate, n is the number of times compounded per year, and t is the number of years.
For this problem, the future value is the sum of the down payment and the payments made over 7 years, which is:$3894 + $1280*7 = $11,314The interest rate is 10% per annum compounded monthly, which means it is divided by 12 to get the monthly interest rate.
So r = 0.10/12 = 0.00833.The number of times compounded per year is monthly, which means n = 12. And the number of years is 7.
Plugging these values into the formula, we get:PV = $11,314 / (1 + 0.00833/12)^(12*7) = $17,258.45Therefore, the purchase price of the property was $17,258.45.
To find the cost of financing, we need to subtract the purchase price from the total amount paid, which is:$1280*7 = $8,960$17,258.45 - $8,960 = $8,393.45
Therefore, the cost of financing was $8,393.45.
For more such questions on purchase price, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30096961
#SPJ11
in a market economy, the interaction between – results in – that influence the choices of consumers
In a market economy, the interaction between supply and demand results in prices that influence the choices of consumers.
A market economy is an economic system that allows for the free exchange of goods and services, as well as a relatively unrestricted mechanism of pricing. This economy operates under the forces of supply and demand, which function independently of one another and without interference from the government or other controlling bodies.
Supply and demand are economic concepts that explain how price and quantity are influenced by buyers and sellers in a market. The quantity of a product or service that suppliers are willing and able to provide at a certain price level is referred to as supply. The amount of a product or service that customers are willing and able to purchase at a particular price level is referred to as demand.
To know more about economy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30131108
#SPJ11
If G-50, n-4, and i% -14%, then F=$329 O True False
False, the future value is $27. 35
How to calculate the future valueThe formula that is used for determining future value (F) is expressed as;
F = G × (1 + i)ⁿ
Such that the parameters are;
G represents the present valuei represents the interest raten represents the number of yearsFrom the information given, substitute the values, we get;
F = $50 × (1 - 0.14)⁴
Subtract the values, we have;
F = $50 × (0.86)⁴
Find the quadruple
F = $50 × 0.5470
Multiply the values, we have;
F = $27. 35
Learn more about future value at: https://brainly.com/question/24703884
#SPJ4
: 1. For a Bamboo Chop board (H.S 4419.11.00.00) Made in USA but no Certificate of Origin provided Value for Currency Conversion VFCC -> US$ 500 Exchange Rate. Exchange Rate 1.2635 Find duty rate under Customs Tariff. Customs Tariff 2022 (cbsa-asfc.gc.ca) attached a. Calculate VFD b. Calculate VFT Calculate Total amount of duty and Taxes to be paid to CBSA.
Therefore, the total amount of duty and taxes to be paid to CBSA is $1459.72.
The given data is as follows:
For a Bamboo Chop board (H.S 4419.11.00.00) made in the USA but no Certificate of Origin provided, the Value for Currency Conversion VFCC -> US$ 500.Exchange Rate: 1.2635.
Customs Tariff 2022 (cbsa-asfc.gc.ca) is attached. We need to find the duty rate under Customs Tariff and calculate VFD and VFT. Then, we need to calculate the total amount of duty and taxes to be paid to CBSA.
So, let's calculate these one by one.
a. Calculate VFD
The value for duty is the actual price paid or payable for the goods when sold for export to Canada. To calculate the VFD, we multiply the value for currency conversion by the exchange rate.
Hence,VFD = VFCC x Exchange Rate= 500 x 1.2635= $631.75
Therefore, the VFD is $631.75.
b. Calculate VFTVFT (Value for Tax) is calculated as follows: VFT = VFD + duty rate x VFD
We need to find the duty rate under Customs Tariff. As per the given data, the product H.S 4419.11.00.00 belongs to the "Tableware and kitchenware" category.
The duty rate for this category is 3.5%.
Hence,Duty Rate = 3.5% = 0.035VFT = VFD + Duty Rate x VFD= 631.75 + 0.035 x 631.75= $653.56
Therefore, VFT is $653.56.Now, let's calculate the total amount of duty and taxes to be paid to CBSA.
Total amount of duty and taxes = VFD + VFT + GST + QST= 631.75 + 653.56 + (VFD + VFT) x 0.05 + (VFD + VFT) x 0.09975= 631.75 + 653.56 + (631.75 + 653.56) x 0.05 + (631.75 + 653.56) x 0.09975= $1459.72
Therefore, the total amount of duty and taxes to be paid to CBSA is $1459.72.
To know more about Tariff visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31366854
#SPJ11
As the Director of Marketing for the Destination Management Organization, you are required to develop a marketing communications campaign for your destination. a. Identify and describe three benefits of IMC campaign. While describing each benefit, make sure to use a real example of destination marketing communications campaign to explain how each benefit described above is evident. [15 marks] b. Identify and explain using relevant real examples, three major factors from Pearce’s Travel Career Ladder in detail and how they can be used in the marketing of a destination.
The act of harmonising a brand's messaging so that it is consistent across all media that the brand employs to reach its target audience is known as integrated marketing communications (IMC). It is a tactical strategy that directs communication across all marketing platforms.
As we've already discussed, there are five main communication methods that work well with integrated marketing communications. These include public relations, advertising, direct marketing, online marketing, and sales promotion.
A marketing plan, also known as an IMC plan, is used by marketers to track and carry out a number of campaigns over a certain time frame. A campaign is built around a theme, a core concept, a goal, or another focus. This idea underlies all IMC initiatives and serves to bind the campaign together.
To learn more about communications, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/31309145
#SPJ4
a. What is Stagflation?
b. Suppose inflation is currently very high. What type of fiscal policy can the government use to reduce inflation? Support your answer to include using appropriate diagrams as discussed in the class.
c. Suppose the country is currently experiencing recession. What type of fiscal policy can the government use to fight off recession? Support your answer to include using appropriate diagrams as discussed in the class.
d. List 4 functions of Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA).
a. Stagflation is a condition where there is a simultaneous rise in inflation and a decline in economic growth, resulting in a situation of stagnation. This situation is caused by the supply-side shocks in the economy that increase the costs of production, reduce the supply of goods and services, and thus, increase their prices.
b. When inflation is very high, the government can use contractionary fiscal policy to reduce it. This policy involves reducing government spending and increasing taxes, which will reduce aggregate demand, and consequently, prices. The contractionary fiscal policy can be explained using the AD-AS model, where the aggregate demand curve shifts leftward, resulting in a lower equilibrium price level and output.
c. When the country is experiencing a recession, the government can use expansionary fiscal policy to fight it off. This policy involves increasing government spending and reducing taxes, which will increase aggregate demand, and consequently, output. The expansionary fiscal policy can be explained using the AD-AS model, where the aggregate demand curve shifts rightward, resulting in a higher equilibrium price level and output.
d. The four functions of the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA) are:
1. Formulating and implementing monetary policy: SAMA is responsible for regulating the money supply and interest rates in the economy, which helps stabilize inflation and promote economic growth.
2. Supervising the banking sector: SAMA regulates and supervises the banking sector to ensure its stability and safety, and to promote its development.
3. Managing the foreign exchange reserves: SAMA manages the country's foreign exchange reserves, which helps maintain the stability of the national currency and facilitates international trade.
4. Promoting financial stability: SAMA monitors and assesses the risks to the financial system and takes appropriate measures to ensure its stability.
To know more about equilibrium visit :
brainly.com/question/30694482
#SPJ11
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Nozick's theory in relation to business ethics? How would Friedman respond? How would Freeman? How would Nozick analyze the case study (One Nation Under Walmart)?
Nozick’s theory has both strengths and weaknesses in relation to business ethics. One of the strengths of Nozick’s theory is that it emphasizes the rights of individuals and the importance of individual freedom. It recognizes that businesses have a right to make a profit and that individuals have a right to engage in voluntary transactions with businesses.
However, one weakness of Nozick’s theory is that it does not adequately address issues of distributive justice. It fails to account for the fact that some individuals and groups may be systematically disadvantaged by the market and that this may require corrective action.
Friedman would likely respond by arguing that businesses have a responsibility to maximize profits and that concerns about distributive justice are best addressed through voluntary philanthropy rather than through government intervention.
Freeman, on the other hand, would likely argue that businesses have a responsibility to consider the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the wider community, in addition to shareholders.
Nozick would likely analyze the case study (One Nation Under Walmart) by emphasizing the voluntary nature of the transactions between Walmart and its employees and customers. He would argue that as long as these transactions are voluntary and do not violate anyone’s rights, they are morally acceptable. However, he may acknowledge that the power dynamics between Walmart and its employees may be uneven and that this could lead to exploitation in some cases.
know more about Nozick’s theory.
https://brainly.com/question/14468748
#SPJ11
A Dozer cost Ph 2,115,000 to purchase. Fuel, oil grease, and minor maintenance are estimated to cost Ph580 per operating hour. A set of tires cost Ph150,000 to replace, and their estimated life is 2,800 use hours. A Ph282,000 major repair will probably be required after 4,200hr of use. The equipment is expected to last for 8,400 hr, after which it will be sold at a price equal to 15% of the original purchase price. A final set of new tires will not be purchased before the sale. How much should the owner of the Dozer charge per hour of use, if it is expected that the machine will operate 1,400 hr per year? The company's capital rate is 8%.
The owner of the Dozer should charge Ph282.79 per hour of use.
To determine the hourly rental rate for a Dozer, the capitalized cost must be calculated.
The capitalized cost is the total cost of an asset adjusted to account for the time value of money.
Given information:
A Dozer cost Ph 2,115,000 to purchase.
Fuel, oil grease, and minor maintenance are estimated to cost Ph580 per operating hour.
A set of tires cost Ph150,000 to replace, and their estimated life is 2,800 use hours.
A Ph282,000 major repair will probably be required after 4,200 hr of use.
The equipment is expected to last for 8,400 hr, after which it will be sold at a price equal to 15% of the original purchase price.
A final set of new tires will not be purchased before the sale.
Solution:
Calculation of Capital Cost:
First, we have to determine the cost of replacing the tires, which is a cost that will be incurred during the life of the equipment.
The life of the tires is 2,800 hours, and the cost of replacement is Ph150,000.
Therefore, the hourly tire cost is given by:
Tire cost per hour = (Tire Replacement Cost / Tire Life) = 150,000/2,800 = Ph53.57
Now we have to determine the present value of the major repair costs that will be incurred at the end of 4,200 operating hours.
The capitalized cost is determined by summing the present value of the purchase price, major repair cost, and tire cost.
Present Value of Major repair costs = 282,000 / (1 + 0.08)4.2 = Ph201,433.81
Capitalized cost = Purchase price + PV of major repair cost + tire cost per hour
Capitalized cost = 2,115,000 + 201,433.81 + 53.57 = Ph2,316,487.38
Now, we need to find the hourly rental rate.
Hourly rental rate = (Capitalized cost x Capital recovery factor) / Estimated operating hours per year
Here, the capital recovery factor can be calculated using the following formula:
Capital recovery factor = i (1 + i)n / (1 + i)n - 1
Where i = Capitalization rate = 8% = 0.08n = Life of the equipment in years = 8Capital recovery factor = 0.10809 / 0.6339 = 0.1706
Therefore, the hourly rental rate is given by:
Hourly rental rate = (Capitalized cost x Capital recovery factor) / Estimated operating hours per year= (2,316,487.38 x 0.1706) / 1,400= Ph282.79
Therefore, the owner of the Dozer should charge Ph282.79 per hour of use.
Learn more about capitalized cost here
https://brainly.in/question/6403673
#SPJ11
Q. 1 a) In each case below, indicate which good you think has a relatively more price elasticity of demand and identify the most likely reason (in terms of determinants of the elasticity of demand) i)
Goods that are considered nonessential, have more substitutes, and have a higher proportion of the consumer's income, are more likely to have a relatively more price elasticity of demand.
Price elasticity of demand (PED) is the responsiveness of the quantity demanded of a good to a change in its price. The following are the determinants of PED:Existence of close substitutes: If close substitutes are available for a good, the PED is higher as people can easily switch to alternatives. For example, coffee and tea are close substitutes, and if the price of coffee rises, consumers can switch to tea. Hence, coffee has a relatively more price elasticity of demand as compared to tea. Luxury versus necessity: Goods that are considered nonessential and are luxury goods, have a higher price elasticity of demand.
This is because the consumers can do without the good if the price increases. For example, cars are a luxury good and have more substitutes like bikes, public transport, and walking. Hence, cars have a relatively more price elasticity of demand than basic food items, which are necessities. Proportion of income spent on the good: If the consumer spends a higher proportion of their income on the good, the PED is higher.
To know more about demand visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30402955
#SPJ11
You are currently considering three investment possibilities. The first is a bond selling in the market for $1,100. The bond has a $1,000 par value with a coupon of 13 percent and will mature in 15 years. For bonds of this risk class, you believe that a 14 percent rate of return is required. The second investment that you are analyzing is a preferred stock that has a par value of $100, sells for $90 and pays an annual dividend of $13.00. Your required rate of return for this stock is 15 percent. The last investment is a common sto with a par value of $25.00 that recently paid a $2.00 dividend per share. The firm's earnings per share have recorded an annual growth rate of 7 percent and are expected t continue this trend indefinitely. The stock is currently selling for $20.00 and you think that a reasonable required rate of return is 20 percent.
Required: Given the above information,
a. Calculate the intrinsic value of each security.
b. Which investment(s) would you buy? Why?
Intrinsic value of
a. Bond = Pv of coupon payments + PV of maturity face value
= PV(130, 15 years, 14%) + PV (1000, 15 years, 14%)
= $938 This is lower than the current market price of $1100
b. Preferred stock
Intrinsic value = Dividend/Required rate of return
= 13/0.15
= $86.67
c. Common stock
Intrinsic value = Do*(1+g)/(r-g)
=2*(1+0.07)/(0.2-0.07)
= $16.46
Is this correct?
Answer:
Yes, your calculations for the intrinsic values are correct.
The bond's intrinsic value of $938 is less than the current market price of $1,100, indicating that it may not be a good investment at this time.
The preferred stock
A corrective tax is a tax that is designed to induce private decision-makers to take account of the social costs that arise from a negative externality. Think of a company near your location; what corrective taxes were imposed on their industry? What was the social effect of that tax?
To address this negative externality, the government might impose a corrective tax on the industry. For instance, they could implement a pollution tax that charges the company a fee for each unit of pollution emitted.
This tax aims to internalize the external costs associated with pollution by making the company bear the social costs of their actions. The social effect of such a tax would likely be a reduction in the level of pollution emitted by the company. By imposing a financial burden on pollution, the tax incentivizes the company to adopt cleaner technologies, improve production processes, or reduce emissions to avoid the tax liability.
This, in turn, leads to a decrease in environmental harm, improved air quality, and potential health benefits for the local community. It's important to note that the actual social effects of a corrective tax can vary depending on the specific circumstances, the industry involved, and the effectiveness of the tax implementation and enforcement.
To know more about corrective tax click here
brainly.com/question/30724843
#SPJ11
Question 1.[25pts] Suppose the cheese business is a competitive industry. All cheese manufacturers have the short-run cost function TC = q² + 9, while demand for cheese in the town is given by Q = 40
The cheese business is a competitive industry. All cheese manufacturers have the short-run cost function TC = q² + 9, while demand for cheese in the town is given by Q = 40. The long-rum equilibrium number of firms in this industry is 13.
To find the long-run equilibrium number of firms in the cheese industry, we need to determine the market price and compare it to the minimum average total cost (ATC) of production.
Given:
Short-run cost function: TC = q² + 9
Demand for cheese in the town: Q = 40
We can set Q equal to the sum of the quantities produced by all firms in the industry:
Q = q₁ + q₂ + q₃ + ... + qₙ
Since all cheese manufacturers have the same short-run cost function,
40 = n * q, where n is the number of firms.
Now let's calculate the average total cost (ATC) of production for each firm.
ATC = TC / q
Substituting the short-run cost function TC = q² + 9:
ATC = (q² + 9) / q
= q + 9/q
The minimum ATC,
d(ATC)/dq = 1 - 9/q² = 0
9/q² = 1
9 = q²
q = 3
Now we have the equilibrium quantity produced by each firm, q = 3. Substituting this back into the equation Q = n * q, where Q = 40:
40 = n * 3
n = 40 / 3
n = 13.33 or 13
Therefore, the number of firms are 13.
The question is incomplete, the complete question is here:
Suppose the cheese business is a competitive industry. All cheese manufacturers have the short-run cost function TC = q² + 9, while demand for cheese in the town is given by Q = 40. Find the long-rum equilibrium number of firms in this industry?
To know more about competitive industry here,
https://brainly.com/question/27286765
#SPJ4
In reinforcement learning and q learning, what is random policy and what is optimal policy?
Reinforcement learning is a sort of machine learning that works through learning by experimentation and trial-and-error. It allows agents to learn by means of positive or negative feedback through rewards. Reinforcement learning is mainly utilized in machine learning to represent and automate sequential decision-making tasks.In reinforcement learning, Q-learning is a model-free reinforcement learning algorithm.
Random Policy is a method that selects an action with the equal probability of selecting every possible action that is present in the environment. It means that we have no information about which action should be chosen or not in the environment that we are interacting with.
Optimal Policy, on the other hand, is a method that selects the best possible action from the environment based on the given state. This policy leads the agent to maximize the total reward received in the environment. It is the process of finding the policy that maximizes the expected cumulative reward over all possible sequences of states and actions. This is the most desirable and efficient policy that every agent tries to achieve in order to maximize the total reward of the environment.
To learn more about "Reinforcement Learning" visit: https://brainly.com/question/29764661
#SPJ11
Stevie commenced a voyage on June 1, 1998, from Chicago to New York and back. The voyage was completed on July 31, 1998. It carried a consignment of handloom textiles on its outward journey and wheat on its return journey. The ship was insured at an annual premium of $ 24,000. From the following particulars draw up the Voyage Account: Port charges $5,000; coal $ 30,000; wages and salaries $50,000; stores purchases $ 8,600; sundry expenses $ 5,500; depreciation (annual) $ 96,000: freight earned (out) $ 1,30,000; freight earned (return) $ 70,000, Address Commission 5% on outward and 4% on return freight. Passage money received $ 10,000. Primage is 5% on freight. The manager is entitled to a 5% commission, on the profit earned, after charging such a commission. Stores and coal on hand were valued at $3,000 on July 31. Prepare Voyage Account of Stevie.
The Voyage account of Stevie would include gross profit of $11,373 on the outward voyage and a loss of $48,855 on the return journey which means the overall loss is $37,482. Stores and coal on hand were valued at $3,000 on July 31 and depreciation for 61 days is $16,027.
Voyage Account of Stevie is as follows,
Particulars Amount
Outward freight $130,000
Less:
Address commission at 5% ($130,000 x 5%) ($6,500)
Less:
Primage at 5% ($130,000 x 5%) ($6,500)
Net freight $117,000
Add:
Passage money $10,000
Gross earnings $127,000
Less:
Port charges $5,000
Coal $30,000
Wages and salaries $50,000
Stores purchases $8,600
Sundry expenses $5,500
Depreciation ($96,000 ÷ 365 x 61) $16,027 ($115,627)
Net profit $11,373
Less:
Manager’s commission at 5% ($11,373 x 5%) ($568)
Balance $10,805
Return freight $70,000
Less:
Address commission at 4% ($70,000 x 4%) ($2,800)
Less:
Primage at 5% ($70,000 x 5%) ($3,500)
Net freight $63,700
Less:
Port charges $5,000
Coal $30,000
Wages and salaries $50,000
Stores purchases $8,600
Sundry expenses $5,500
Depreciation ($96,000 ÷ 365 x 61) $16,027 ($115,127)
Loss $(51,427)
Less:
Manager’s commission at 5% ($51,427 x 5%) ($2,572)
Net loss $(48,855)
Gross profit on the outward voyage is $11,373, while there is a loss of $48,855 on the return journey. This implies that the overall loss is $48,855 - $11,373 = $37,482. Stores and coal on hand were valued at $3,000 on July 31. Depreciation for 61 days (i.e., from June 1 to July 31) is $96,000 ÷ 365 x 61 = $16,027.
Learn more about Gross profit:
https://brainly.com/question/942181
#SPJ11
Aaron Medford has invested $600 in the corporate stock of a manufacturer of offshore oil drilling equipment. If the company goes bankrupt, the most Medford could lose would be: 1) half of his investment 2) the par value of his stock 3) $600 4) $600 plus foreclosure costs 5) nothing--the company must reimburse him his investment
The most Aaron Medford could lose if the company goes bankrupt is $600, which represents his initial investment in the corporate stock. Option c is correct.
If the company goes bankrupt, Aaron Medford's maximum potential loss would be his initial investment of $600. As a shareholder, he owns a portion of the company's stock, and in the event of bankruptcy, the value of the stock may decrease or become worthless.
However, Medford's liability is limited to the amount he invested in the stock. Shareholders are considered investors and not creditors, so they are not personally responsible for the company's debts or obligated to cover any additional costs or foreclosure expenses. Therefore, in this scenario, option 3 is correct.
To know more about investment, here
https://brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ4
Estimates of 13.0 per 1000 and 6.2 per 1000 have been given in this chapter for the average annual incidence of first coronary events among male smokers and nonsmokers in the age range 40-64. Suppose that the proportion of men who smoke could be reduced through health awareness efforts from 43% to 25%. As- suming that the average amount that smokers smoke remains the same as before, which of the following quantities would you expect to change and if so by how much? a. Rate ratio b. Risk ratio c. Odds ratio
Estimates of 13.0 per 1000 and 6.2 per 1000 have been given in this chapter for the average annual incidence of first coronary events among male smokers and nonsmokers in the age range 40-64. Suppose that the proportion of men who smoke could be reduced through health awareness efforts from 43% to 25%. Assuming that the average amount that smokers smoke remains the same as before, the risk ratio is the quantity that you would expect to change.
The risk ratio is defined as the risk of disease in the exposed group (smokers) divided by the risk of disease in the unexposed group (nonsmokers).The formula for calculating risk ratio is as follows:Risk Ratio (RR) = [a/(a + b)] / [c/(c + d)]Where,a = number of exposed subjects with the diseaseb = number of exposed subjects without the diseasec = number of unexposed subjects with the diseased = number of unexposed subjects without the diseaseLet us assume that there are 1,000 men in the 40-64 age range. In the current scenario, 43% of men smoke and 57% do not smoke. Then the following table can be constructed to calculate the risk ratio: Diseased Not Diseased TotalSmokers a = 13 b = 870 883 Nonsmokers c = 6.2 d = 111.8 118Risk Ratio = (13/883) / (6.2/118) = 2.46After the health awareness efforts, the proportion of smokers reduces to 25%, and 75% of men do not smoke. Then the following table can be constructed to calculate the risk ratio: Diseased Not Diseased TotalSmokers a = 13 b = 39 52Nonsmokers c = 6.2 d = 911.8 918Risk Ratio = (13/52) / (6.2/918) = 1.36Thus, the risk ratio reduces from 2.46 to 1.36. Hence, it is expected to change by 44.7% (calculated as 100 x [(2.46-1.36)/2.46]). Therefore, it can be concluded that if the proportion of men who smoke is reduced through health awareness efforts from 43% to 25%, the risk ratio will be reduced by 44.7%.For such more question on average
https://brainly.com/question/130657
#SPJ11
A restaurant chain is thinking of opening a new location in Pomona, which would be its brand-new 6-year project. The restaurant chain's manager's research team believes that the new restaurant would be able to bring revenues equal to $455,000 each year. In addition, costs of goods sold such as money paid to suppliers, utility bills, etc. would add up to a total of $311,000 each year. The company would need to spend $555,000 right away to buy all necessary fixed assets such as the new restaurant building, equipment, etc. These fixed assets will be losing their economic value for the duration of the new project according to the five-year property class under the MACRS system: Year 1: 20.00 percent, Year 2: 32.00 percent, Year 3: 19.20 percent, Year 4: 11.52 percent, Year 5: 11.52 percent, Year 6: 5.76 percent. The restaurant chain faces 35 percent income tax rate rate for its taxable income each year. Calculate the operating cash flow for the 3rd year of this brand-new restaurant project.
Operating Cash Flow = $37,440 + $106,560 - $0Operating Cash Flow = $144,000Therefore, the operating cash flow for the 3rd year of the brand-new restaurant project is $144,000.
Operating cash flow is calculated by deducting the cost of goods sold from the restaurant's total revenue and then adding back non-cash expenses such as depreciation. Then, the tax is subtracted to get the operating cash flow for that particular year.
To calculate the operating cash flow for the 3rd year of the restaurant project, the following steps should be taken:Step 1: Calculate the depreciation expense for each year. Year 1: ($555,000 * 20%) = $111,000Year 2: ($555,000 * 32%) = $177,600Year 3: ($555,000 * 19.2%) = $106,560Year 4: ($555,000 * 11.52%) = $63,792Year 5: ($555,000 * 11.52%) = $63,792Year 6: ($555,000 * 5.76%) = $31,848Step 2: Calculate the earnings before taxes (EBT) for the 3rd year of the restaurant project. EBT = Revenue - Cost of Goods Sold - Depreciation ExpenseEBT = $455,000 - $311,000 - $106,560EBT = $37,440
To know more about Cash Flow visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27994727
#SPJ11
Barbara, a resident of Canada, owns 100% of the common shares of both Windsor Wholesale Ltd. ("WWL") and Klondike Klosets Ltd. ("KKL"). Both corporations have a March 31 year-end.
"KKL" had BOTH active business income AND taxable income of $ 18,000 for its 2019 taxation year. Barbara has decided to allocate to "KKL" as much of the small business limit as is needed to maximize the small business deduction for "KKL", with the remaining balance of the available annual business limit allocation being made to "WWL".
Most but not all of "WWL" 's income is from an active business carried on in Canada. The following information pertains to "WWL" for its 2019 taxation year: $
Division B net income for tax purposes $ 190,000
Net taxable capital gains 10,000
Charitable donation contributions 3,000
Recapture of CCA on sale of operating business assets 4,000
Required:
The small business deduction for "WWL" for 2019 should be:
a) $ 34,200
b) $36,290
c) $35,530
d) $ 34,390
e) None of the above
The small business deduction for WWL for the 2019 taxation year should be $184,000. None of these. Option E
To calculate the small business deduction for Windsor Wholesale Ltd. ("WWL") for the 2019 taxation year, we need to consider the rules and limits set by the Canadian tax authorities.
The small business deduction is calculated based on the active business income (ABI) of the corporation and the available annual business limit (AABL). The AABL is the maximum amount of income eligible for the small business deduction. For 2019, the AABL is $500,000.
To maximize the small business deduction for Klondike Klosets Ltd. ("KKL"), Barbara has decided to allocate to KKL as much of the small business limit as is needed. Therefore, the remaining balance of the AABL will be allocated to WWL.
Given the information provided for WWL, we can calculate the small business deduction as follows:
ABI for tax purposes = Division B net income for tax purposes - Net taxable capital gains + Recapture of CCA on sale of operating business assets
= $190,000 - $10,000 + $4,000
= $184,000
Since the small business deduction is limited to the AABL, we need to compare the ABI to the AABL to determine the eligible amount:
Eligible ABI = Minimum(ABI, AABL)
= Minimum($184,000, $500,000)
= $184,000
Option E
For more such questions on deduction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29881937
#SPJ11
3. If you had $20 000 in your retirement bank account and (through your investments) your assumed compounded growth rate was 7%, how much money would you have saved over the course of your working lif
With a 7% compounded growth rate, you would have saved approximately $143,181.47 over the course of your working life.
How much money would you accumulate with a 7% compounded growth rate over your working life?
Assuming a compounded growth rate of 7% and an initial investment of $20,000 in your retirement bank account, you can calculate the future value of your savings over the course of your working life. The formula for compound interest is:
Future Value = Principal × (1 + Interest Rate)^Number of Periods
In this case, the principal is $20,000, the interest rate is 7% (or 0.07 as a decimal), and the number of periods corresponds to the number of years you are working. Since the question doesn't specify the duration of your working life, we'll assume it as 30 years for the purpose of this explanation.
Using the formula, the future value of your savings can be calculated as follows:
Future Value = $20,000 × (1 + 0.07)³⁰
= $20,000 × 1.07³⁰
≈ $143,181.47
Therefore, with a 7% compounded growth rate, you would have saved approximately $143,181.47 over the course of your working life.
Learn more about: Future value
brainly.com/question/30787954
#SPJ11
"We need new regulations in the banking sector to ensure that the global financial crisis never happens again.’
Discuss this commonly heard statement.
In your answer, make sure you a. describe the common types of risk facing any banking sector and how these risks played out in the USA in the lead up to the global financial crisis, and b. explain how effective you believe the new Basel III regulations will be in managing these risks in the future."
The statement, "We need new regulations in the banking sector to ensure that the global financial crisis never happens again" is commonly heard. The global financial crisis of 2008 showed that a poorly regulated banking sector can threaten the stability of the whole financial system. The risks facing any banking sector include liquidity risk, credit risk, and market risk.
These risks played out in the USA in the lead up to the global financial crisis as follows:
Credit risk: Banks in the US started giving out mortgages to people who could not afford them. This caused a housing bubble that led to a crash in the subprime mortgage market and a decline in home prices.
Liquidity risk: In the US, banks relied heavily on short-term borrowing to finance long-term loans. This meant that they were vulnerable to a sudden lack of liquidity. When the subprime mortgage market crashed, investors started to pull out their money from banks. The banks could not pay their debts, which caused a liquidity crisis.
Market risk: The financial crisis started in the US housing market but quickly spread to other parts of the financial system. Many banks had invested in the subprime mortgage market and other toxic assets that became worthless after the housing market crash. This caused a systemic crisis that threatened the stability of the whole financial system.
The Basel III regulations are designed to manage these risks by increasing the capital requirements of banks. This means that banks have to hold more capital as a cushion against losses. Basel III also introduces new liquidity requirements that force banks to hold more liquid assets. These regulations should help to prevent future financial crises by making banks more resilient to shocks.
However, there is still some debate about whether the regulations are sufficient to prevent another crisis. Some critics argue that the regulations do not go far enough and that more needs to be done to ensure that the banking sector is stable and secure.
To learn more about banking sector: https://brainly.com/question/28002074
#SPJ11
assume the fed purchases $17,450 worth of u.s. treasury bonds from warren buffett, who promptly deposits the money in the first national bank. assuming that the required reserve ratio is 4.4 percent and banks keep zero excess reserves, the money supply in the economy will eventually:
The effect on the money supply in the economy, given the treasury bonds purchased would be A . increase by a maximum of 16,752.
How will the money supply change ?First, there is a need to find the require reserve ratio from the amount purchased by the Federal reserve to be :
= 4 / 100 x 17 , 450
= 4 % x 17 , 450
= $ 698
The amount the money supply will change by, is therefore a maximum of :
= Amount purchased by FED - Required reserve
= 17, 450 - 698
= $ 16, 752
Find out more on money supply at https://brainly.com/question/28961535
#SPJ4
Options include:
increase by a maximum of 16,752.
increase by a maximum of $17.450.
increase by a maximum of $436,250.
increase by a maximum of 569,800.
I Buy A Piece Of Equipment, Walk Me Through The Impact On The 3 Financial Statements.
When you buy a piece of equipment, it affects all three financial statements - the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
Let's see how it impacts these statements:
Balance Sheet: The balance sheet is divided into two categories, assets and liabilities. The piece of equipment that you bought is an asset, so it will be recorded as a long-term asset on the balance sheet. However, the equipment will also reduce your cash balance, so cash is reduced and assets are increased at the same time.
Income Statement: The income statement is designed to track the revenue, expenses, and net income over a specific period. Since the piece of equipment is an asset and not an expense, it won't impact the income statement immediately. Instead, the cost of the equipment will be gradually expensed over its useful life as depreciation.
Cash Flow Statement: The cash flow statement keeps track of cash inflows and outflows during a specific period. The purchase of equipment will reduce the cash balance, so it will show up as a cash outflow from investing activities. However, the depreciation expense, which represents the gradual loss of value of the equipment over time, will be added back to the net income in the operating activities section of the cash flow statement. This is because depreciation is a non-cash expense and doesn't impact the actual cash balance of the company.
In conclusion, when you buy a piece of equipment, it will impact all three financial statements - the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
know more about balance sheet here,
https://brainly.com/question/31040443
#SPJ11
The table below provides the information on the monthly USD/EUR exchange rate:
January 2021
1.22 USD/1EUR
July 2021
1.18 USD/1EUR
Discuss the possible consequences of this exchange rate change for trade between Europe and US.
The exchange rate change of USD/EUR from 1.22 to 1.18 in the period between January 2021 and July 2021 will have some consequences for trade between Europe and the US. What is the exchange rate? The exchange rate is the value of one currency for the purpose of conversion to another currency.
Exchange rate fluctuations are common and have far-reaching consequences for international trade, and they're not something that is entirely unexpected. The major possible consequences of an exchange rate change between Europe and the US are:
1. Exports and Imports As USD gets stronger relative to EUR, then US goods are likely to be more expensive for the Europeans, while European goods are cheaper for Americans. So it's possible that this exchange rate change would result in an increase in exports from the US and a decrease in imports from Europe.
2. Exchange rate and inflation rate Inflation is a crucial component of an economy, and it impacts different economic sectors. Exchange rates and inflation are also closely related. If the exchange rate changes, it could lead to inflation or deflation. An exchange rate decrease, for example, can lead to a rise in inflation in a country.
3. Domestic interest rate Exchange rates can influence domestic interest rates as well. A decrease in the exchange rate may result in higher interest rates, which can lead to an increase in capital inflows and investment.
4. Profits of multinationals Companies that operate in more than one country are often subject to exchange rate fluctuations, which can impact their earnings. The decrease in USD/EUR exchange rate could lower the profits of US multinationals, while European multinationals operating in the US might experience a boost in their profits. Summary:
The exchange rate changes between USD/EUR in the period between January 2021 and July 2021 could lead to higher exports from the US and reduced imports from Europe. The fluctuations can also affect inflation, domestic interest rate and profits of multinationals.
To know more about exchange rate refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10187894
#SPJ11
electronic brainstorming is a more convenient process, but it generates fewer ideas than the traditional brainstorming process. true or false
The given statement "electronic brainstorming is a more convenient process, but it generates fewer ideas than the traditional brainstorming process" is a false statement. Electronic brainstorming generates more ideas than traditional brainstorming.
Brainstorming is the process of generating a large number of ideas to find a solution to a problem. It is a technique used by groups to generate as many ideas as possible, usually for a particular task or project. There are two types of brainstorming: traditional brainstorming and electronic brainstorming.
Traditional brainstorming is a technique that involves a group of people meeting in a room to share ideas and opinions on a particular topic. During this process, participants can suggest as many ideas as possible without any evaluation or criticism. Each idea is written down on a piece of paper for later analysis.
Electronic brainstorming, also known as e-brainstorming, is a process where a group of individuals come together virtually to brainstorm ideas through the use of computers and the internet.
This method is more convenient than traditional brainstorming because it allows participants from different locations to participate in the process without having to be in the same room.Electronic brainstorming, facilitated by technology tools and platforms, can actually enhance the idea generation process by allowing for simultaneous contributions from multiple participants, regardless of their physical location. This can result in a higher quantity of ideas compared to traditional brainstorming methods, where only one person speaks at a time. Additionally, electronic brainstorming can provide anonymity, which can encourage more diverse and creative contributions from participants who may feel hesitant to speak up in a face-to-face setting. Therefore, electronic brainstorming has the potential to generate a larger number of ideas compared to traditional brainstorming.Learn more about brainstorming here:-
https://brainly.com/question/1606124
#SPJ11
4. A firm can produce a quantity q(x, y) ((x + 1)³+y³)¹/3, in kg, of its good when it uses rkg of copper and ykg of iron. If copper and iron cost r and s pounds per kg respectively, use the method
The quantity that the firm can produce is q(x, y) = ((x + 1)³ + y³)¹/3, in kg when it uses r kg of copper and y kg of iron.
Also, given that copper and iron cost r and s pounds per kg respectively.To find the firm's cost function we need to find out the amount of copper and iron they use for their production process. We can then multiply it by their cost per kg, and then add the two values together. This will give us the firm's total cost.Let's find out how much copper and iron the firm uses.
We know that the firm produces q(x, y) kg of its good when it uses r kg of copper and y kg of iron. So, for producing 1 kg of good, the firm uses the following amount of copper and iron: r/q(x, y) kg of copper and y/q(x, y) kg of iron.So, for producing x kg of good, the firm uses the following amount of copper and iron:x(r/q(x, y)) kg of copper and xy/q(x, y) kg of iron. The cost of copper used by the firm would be:r(x(r/q(x, y))) = rx/q(x, y) pounds. The cost of iron used by the firm would be:s (xy/q(x, y)) = sxy/q(x, y) pounds.
To know more about produce visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32558658
#SPJ11-
If 0.71 U.S. dollars can be exchanged for one Canadian dollar, we say that the Canadian-U.S. exchange rate is ACCOM OA. 0.71. OB. 71.0. O C. 1.41. D. 1.0. E. 1.33. 4
The Canadian-U.S. exchange rate is expressed as the number of U.S. dollars, then the value of one Canadian dollar is 0.71 U.S. dollars. Thus, option A is correct.
The exchange rate designates the value of one currency in another currency. Different nations have different currencies. In order to compare the value of one currency to another nation's currency value, we need to use the exchange rate methods.
In the given scenario, the Canadian-U.S. exchange rate is discussed. The value of one Canadian dollar is exchanged into the U.S. dollar rate to get the same amount by exchanging money using exchange rates.
To learn more about Exchange rates
https://brainly.com/question/32200858
#SPJ4
Veronica Mars, a recent graduate of Bell’s accounting program, evaluated the operating performance of Dunn Company’s six divisions. Veronica made the following presentation to Dunn’s board of directors and suggested the Percy Division be eliminated. "If the Percy Division is eliminated," she said, "our total profits would increase by $26,600."
The Other
Five Divisions Percy
Division Total
Sales $1,664,000 $100,500 $1,764,500
Cost of goods sold 978,500 76,700 1,055,200
Gross profit 685,500 23,800 709,300
Operating expenses 527,500 50,400 577,900
Net income $158,000 $ (26,600 ) $131,400
In the Percy Division, cost of goods sold is $59,400 variable and $17,300 fixed, and operating expenses are $30,100 variable and $20,300 fixed. None of the Percy Division’s fixed costs will be eliminated if the division is discontinued.
Is Veronica right about eliminating the Percy Division? Prepare a schedule to support your answer. (Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number e.g. -45 or parentheses e.g. (45).)
Based on the presented data and analysis, Veronica is correct about eliminating the Percy Division as it would lead to an increase in total profits for Dunn Company.
Percy Division Before Discontinuation:
Sales: $100,500
Cost of goods sold: $59,400 (variable) + $17,300 (fixed) = $76,700
Operating expenses: $30,100 (variable) + $20,300 (fixed) = $50,400
Net income: $100,500 - $76,700 - $50,400 = $(26,600) (negative net income)
Total Net Income Before Discontinuation:
Total Net Income = Net Income of the Other Five Divisions + Net Income of the Percy Division
Total Net Income = $158,000 + $(26,600) = $131,400
Percy Division After Discontinuation:
Sales: $0 (as the division is eliminated)
Cost of goods sold: $0 (as the division is eliminated)
Operating expenses: $0 (as the division is eliminated)
Net income: $0 (as the division is eliminated)
Total Net Income After Discontinuation:
Total Net Income = Net Income of the Other Five Divisions + Net Income After Discontinuation of Percy Division
Total Net Income = $158,000 + $0 = $158,000
By comparing the total net income before and after discontinuing the Percy Division, we find:
Increase in Total Profits = Total Net Income After Discontinuation - Total Net Income Before Discontinuation
Increase in Total Profits = $158,000 - $131,400 = $26,600
As Veronica suggested, the elimination of the Percy Division would indeed result in an increase of $26,600 in total profits.
Therefore, based on the presented data and analysis, Veronica is correct about eliminating the Percy Division as it would lead to an increase in total profits for Dunn Company.
know more about net income here,
https://brainly.com/question/31813641
#SPJ11
what are some cons of a dupont performance coatings carve out
A DuPont Performance Coatings carve-out is the procedure of spinning off DuPont's Performance Coatings unit, which produces and sells automotive paints and coatings, into a separate independent company.
However, there are some drawbacks to a DuPont Performance Coatings carve-out. Here are some of them:
Expenses: One of the main drawbacks of the DuPont Performance Coatings carve-out is that it may be quite expensive. A carve-out necessitates a considerable amount of money, as the entity must construct its administration and operations infrastructure. As a result, it might be prohibitively expensive for smaller companies, which may limit the number of interested parties.
Legal Complications: Another downside of a DuPont Performance Coatings carve-out is that it may involve legal issues. Carve-outs may take a lot of time to resolve and may encounter numerous challenges during the transition process. It may also have negative legal implications if there are any existing legal conflicts related to the spin-off.
Integration: In some situations, DuPont Performance Coatings carve-outs may struggle with integration and collaboration. When a spin-off entity is created, it may not always have the necessary resources or experience to manage operations. As a result, it may be challenging for the carve-out to function effectively and efficiently. Also, employees may have difficulty adapting to new structures and processes.
Conflict of Interest: Finally, there is the possibility of a conflict of interest arising from a DuPont Performance Coatings carve-out. The parent firm may have competing interests in the newly created business, such as utilizing their technological advancements to benefit the core business. As a result, the company's performance may be impacted, which may lead to a decrease in the organization's value.
To know more about DuPont visit :
brainly.com/question/30403150
#SPJ11