Answer:
Possible Reasons:
Political - Concerns governments, rights, and power.
POLITICAL REASONS: ENCOURAGEMENT FROM RULERS
British monarchs encouraged the development of colonies as new sources of wealth and power. They
granted charters to groups of businessmen, like the Virginia Company, who offered to help colonists
settle in the “New World.”
Economic - Concerns money and wealth.
ECONOMIC REASONS: HUNGER FOR GOLD AND SILVER
Based on the success of Spain, the first colonists believed that gold and silver existed in great
abundance in the Americas. These early adventurers came to the Americas in search of precious metals.
ECONOMIC REASONS: LAND HUNGER
Colonial settlements presented new business opportunities for merchants. The“Proprietors” who
owned the Carolinas encouraged people to come. Many came to own their own land. Most people in
Britain, Ireland, and the rest of Europe were peasants or tenant farmers with small, over-worked lands
and high rents. In America, land still seemed plentiful. The settlers did not recognize the rights of
Native American Indians or understand their use of the land. Many of the first settlers were given free
land by the colony. Later, they were able to purchase land.
Later many colonists came as “indentured servants.” A colonial landowner paid for their passage across
the Atlantic, and the indentured servant promised to work on the landowner’s plantation or farm,
usually for a period of seven years. Once the debt was paid off, indentured servants obtained freedom
and began saving to buy their own land.
Religious - Deals with beliefs and practices in the worship of God.
RELIGIOUS REASONS
Protestant groups, like the Pilgrims and Puritans, came to the Americas to establish their own
communities, where they could worship God in their own way. Catholics, Quakers, and Jews later
came to the colonies seeking freedom of worship.
Social - Involves how people organize themselves or live together.
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REASONS: A BETTER LIFE
Most colonists had faced difficult lives in Britain, Ireland, Scotland, or Germany. They came to the
Americas to escape poverty, warfare, political turmoil, famine and disease. They believed colonial life
offered new opportunities
How did the actions of the settlers of kanas contribute to the civil war ?
1: Pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers were actually killing each other which made
many believe that war was inevitable.
2: © A northern militia group invaded Kansas which started the civil war.
3: © A southern militia group invaded Kansas which started the civil war.
4: Settlers in Kansas decided to secede from the Union which started the civil war.
The actions of the settlers of Kansas contributed to the Civil War 1. Pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers were actually killing each other which made many believe that war was inevitable.
Kansas was a territory that was being fought over by pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers.
The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed the settlers to determine whether their territory would be a free state or a slave state, leading to a race for power between pro- and anti-slavery factions.
Violence soon broke out between these groups, with both sides committing acts of terrorism.
The pro-slavery Border Ruffians were especially violent, burning buildings and murdering those who opposed slavery.
This led to the formation of an anti-slavery group called the Jayhawkers, which retaliated with violence.
2. A northern militia group invaded Kansas, which started the Civil War:The Free-State movement emerged in Kansas after the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
It was a movement led by anti-slavery activists who sought to make Kansas a free state.
In May 1856, a group of pro-slavery activists attacked the town of Lawrence, Kansas, where many Free-State supporters lived.
The attack resulted in the destruction of the town and the killing of two Free-State supporters.
In response, John Brown led a group of men to Pottawatomie Creek, where they killed five pro-slavery settlers in retaliation.
This event was one of the factors that led to the Civil War.
3. A southern militia group invaded Kansas, which started the Civil War:Missouri, a slave state, bordered Kansas.
This proximity allowed pro-slavery Missourians to cross the border and vote in Kansas elections to sway the vote in their favor.
This led to a situation in which both sides were trying to establish dominance over the territory, resulting in violence.
In 1857, the pro-slavery Lecompton Constitution was written, which would have made Kansas a slave state.
However, it was rejected by the Free-State supporters, which led to the formation of a pro-slavery militia group called the Border Ruffians.
They invaded Kansas in an attempt to force the state to accept the Lecompton Constitution.
This event helped to set the stage for the Civil War.
4. Settlers in Kansas decided to secede from the Union, which started the Civil War:Kansas was a territory that was heavily divided on the issue of slavery.
When it became a state in 1861, it chose to remain a free state.
This angered the pro-slavery factions in the state, who felt that the state should have been a slave state.
When the Civil War broke out, Kansas remained loyal to the Union, which helped to tip the balance of power in the war.
The state's decision to remain loyal to the Union was a major factor in the war.
For more questions on Civil War
https://brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ8
From which of the following courts is there no appeal?
A- US Court of Appeals
B- US Supreme Court
C- US District Court
D- US High Court
Answer:
B
Explanation:
NIRNGIOERNORNEGIIIJPINWE Si
How did the Songhai Empire strengthen Islam?
===================================================
Even if you dont answer and spam have a Blessed day : 3
Answer:
Songhai was a leading country in literacy. most of the schools and universities were islam based and the students studied the Koran in these schools and universities. Askia Mohammed was a devoted Muslim and did not allow any other beliefs like Sonni Ali did. they also traded a lot of products using the sub sahara trading routes were they didn't allow any Christians to form a part of.
hope this helps, it is just a quick summary
Where in which country would u find palace of Versailles
Answer:
The answer is Versailles, France
Where did the civil rights movement shift its focus after the passage of the Civil Rights Act?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options for this question we can say the following.
Where did the civil rights movement shift its focus after the passage of the Civil Rights Act?
We can say that after Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, the movement focused on improving the right to vote of the black people in the southern states.
Today we know that in the South, during Reconstruction, the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was rarely enforced.
The Civil Rights Act was approved in March 1875. The Act granted rights to African Americans and prohibited any kind of racial discrimination in public places such as restaurants, hotels, and public transportation. But during Reconstruction, the Southern states did not enforce the mandate of the Act. Many people living in the Southern states did not accept the desegregation laws and still supported slavery. So they kept on being racist and applying segregational conducts.
What investment do financial advisors consider to be risk free, and why?
Answer: Treasuries (especially T-bills) are considered to be risk-free because the U.S. government backs them. Because they are so safe, the return on risk-free assets is very close to the current interest rate. Many academics say that there is no such thing as a risk-free asset because all financial assets carry some degree
Explanation: (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧ You're Welcome!!! ^^
(∩^o^)⊃━☆F R O M~ KURRO
Do you think Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor was justified? Explain your answer below.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think Japan's decision to attack Pearl Harbor was justified from the perspective of the Japanese Army according to the circumstances of that moment during World War II.
The Japanese wanted retribution for the recent oil embargo decision of the United States. In August 1941, the US federal government imposed an oil embargo as a punishment for the Japanese invasion and presence over different regions of Asia.
Japanese officials considered that an unexpected attack over the navy base of Pearl Harbor, in Hawaii would severely diminish the navy vessels on the United States in the Pacific, opening the way for a powerful Japanese presence in the area.
Why does headline in the Japan times and mail call the senate vote a “Declaration of War”
The headline in the Japan times and mail call the senate to vote for a “Declaration of War” due to the new law's severe restrictions on immigration from eastern and southern Europe as well as those who are Indian, Chinese, and Japanese.
What are votes?Voting is a process that a party, such as an election or gathering, can use to reach a consensus or voice an opinion, typically after talks, debates, or political ads.
Even Asians who had not hitherto been barred from entering the country—the Japanese in specifically no longer be permitted. Most Japanese immigrants to the United States came for economic reasons.
People in Japan were forced to look outside of their country for a better life due to stagnant wage conditions that led to subpar living standards and excessive unemployment.
Learn more about votes, Here:
brainly.com/question/21093353
#SPJ6
How does Admiral Spruance explain the U.S. victory
at Midway?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Admiral Spruance explained the U.S. victory at Midway in the following way.
It was June 4, Admiral Raymond A. Spruance and Admira Fletcher had to engage four Japanese ships in the Battle of Midway. The US intelligence services could predict the way the Japanese carriers and planes would be approaching the battle. So the US navy had a good idea of what to expect from the Japanese fleet and how to counterattack it.
Admiral Spruance said that what they did was to wait until the Japanese ships were refueling, carrying weapons, and preparing their aircraft to attack them because the Japanese were in a vulnerable position. That is how the US navy could inflict great damage to the Japanese fleet and aircraft. United States bombers sank three Japanese ships.
The US navy ended up winning the battle and historians consider this a major turning point in the Pacific Theater during World War II.
What current issues are examples of the “tug-of-war" for a stronger role between the national and state government?
Answer: I did this in school and had to do a essay about it soo i just coped it off of my school and but it here
Explanation:cThe President and Congress often seem to be working at cross-purposes in foreign policy. To give just a few recent examples: - The administration requests funding of the United Nations, and Congress links the funding to an anti-abortion provision it knows the President will veto. This kind of tug-of-war between the President and Congress is not necessarily bad. Foreign policy disagreements between the branches are inevitable, and even, sometimes, constructive. Debate and tension can lead to useful refinements and improvements of our policies.
American foreign policy always has more force to it when the President and Congress speak with one voice. Congress is our most representative branch of government. It best articulates the concerns of different segments of the population. When the President takes these views into consideration in formulating foreign policy, the policy that results is more likely to have strong public support. And foreign policy with strong domestic support makes the U.S. more respected and effective The President is the chief of U.S. foreign policy, and therefore he has the primary responsibility. In addition, the President can propose foreign policy legislation to Congress and can make policy statements that outline key goals of the Administration. The executive branch is the only branch of government that has the power to implement foreign policy, which gives the President another advantage that Congress does not have. Even when Congress has passed foreign-policy legislation, the President sometimes interprets it on his own, and can implement the policy however he wishes. Yet every administration has consulted inadequately on major foreign policy issues. Congress can also influence foreign policy. It can create (or threaten to create) foreign policy legislation that can alter the way the President must pursue a policy. It can generate ideas by passing resolutions that declare Congress' stand on foreign policy issues. These resolutions have no official standing, but they do make Congress' views known. Congress also has the power of oversight. All policies implemented by the President are subject to investigations and hearings by Congress. Consultation with Congress provides the President with a wider range of view than he may receive from his own advisers. The President is isolated in our system of government. No one, as George Reedy once said, “tells the President to go soak his head”. Cabinet officials and other high-ranking advisers serve at his pleasure. Their jobs depend on his favor, and they usually can decipher the direction in which the President wants to go. Members of Congress do not serve at the President's favor. Their independence from the President gives their advice added weight. The President may not like, or take, the advice of Congress, but his consideration of it is likely to produce better policies.
Works Cited
1. http://www.examiner.com/article/who-makes-foreign-policy-the-roles-of-the-president-and-congress 2. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants_docs
3. http://www.chacha.com/question/what-are-the-foreign-policy-powers-of-congress-and-how-are-they-shared-with-the-president 4. http://www.examiner.com/article/who-makes-foreign-policy-the-roles-of-the-president-and-congress 5. http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/bcc/pensions/glossary.page#.UlS1t3ko7IV
How could Europe have changed so much between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance?
Answer: The Renaissance is credited with bridging the gap between the Middle Ages and modern-day civilization. During the Middle Ages, a period that took place between the fall of ancient Rome in 476 A.D. and the beginning of the 14th century, Europeans made few advances in science and art.
Explanation: ヾ(•ω•`)o You're Welcome!!! *☆*: .｡. o(≧▽≦)o .｡.:*☆
F r o m~ K u r r o
Why was Rhineland separate from Germany
Answer:
On 7 March 1936 German troops marched into the Rhineland. This action was directly against the Treaty of Versailles which had laid out the terms which the defeated Germany had accepted. This move, in terms of foreign relations, threw the European allies, especially France and Britain, into confusion.
describe the social pressures that contributed to the english colonization of north america.
Question:
Describe the social pressures that contributed to the English colonization of North America.
Answer:
They were determined by the historic disposition of the English colonization to which were caused by, quote on quote, religious shifts, demographic changes, and labor interests.
Answer:
Explanation:
The English colonization of North America was influenced by various social pressures. One significant factor was religious persecution, as groups like the Puritans sought refuge and religious freedom in the New World. Economic motivations also played a role, with English individuals and companies seeking wealth through trade and the extraction of valuable resources.
Additionally, social tensions and overcrowding in England led to the desire for new opportunities and the chance to establish social hierarchies in the colonies. These social pressures collectively drove English colonization and shaped the early foundations of North American society.
hope it helps!
How did Hamilton influence the founding of the United States?
Answer:
He wrote part of the constitution
Explanation:
Why did support for the Institutional Revolutionary Party decline in Mexico in the 1990s?
Mexico's military suffered an embarrassing defeat in the Falklands War.
Rising foreign debt and unemployment increased public discontent.
People came to believe their country was a puppet of Fidel Castro.
The party failed to prevent the United States from building a border wall.
Support for the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) in Mexico declined in the 1990s due to several factors, but the main reasons were rising foreign debt and unemployment, which led to increased public discontent.
During the 1980s, Mexico experienced a severe economic crisis marked by skyrocketing foreign debt, hyperinflation, and a declining economy. The PRI, which had been in power for over 70 years, was unable to effectively address these issues, leading to widespread disillusionment among the Mexican population. The government's inability to manage the economic crisis resulted in high unemployment rates and growing social inequality, further eroding support for the PRI.
Additionally, the PRI's authoritarian rule and allegations of widespread corruption contributed to the decline in public trust. Mexicans began to question the party's commitment to democracy and demanded more transparent and accountable governance. The PRI's monopoly on power for several decades had created a system plagued by nepotism and cronyism, which bred resentment among the population.
The Falklands War, puppet allegations, and the construction of a border wall were not direct factors contributing to the decline in support for the PRI in the 1990s. The Falklands War was a conflict between Argentina and the United Kingdom, unrelated to Mexican domestic politics. The puppet allegations and the border wall issue are not accurate representations of the factors that influenced the decline in support for the PRI.
Final answer:
In summary, the declining support for the Institutional Revolutionary Party in Mexico during the 1990s can primarily be attributed to the economic crisis characterized by rising foreign debt and unemployment. These challenges, coupled with public discontent over corruption and authoritarian rule, led to a significant loss of trust in the PRI and a growing demand for political change.
For more questions on Mexico
https://brainly.com/question/28839253
#SPJ8
what did india receive from imperial partnership with great britain?
During the imperial partnership with Great Britain, India received some benefits and drawbacks. These benefits include political stability, economic expansion, modernization, and infrastructure development.
India received several things from its imperial partnership with Great Britain:
Infrastructure Development: British colonial rule in India brought significant infrastructural advancements. The British constructed railways, roads, bridges, and ports, which facilitated transportation and trade within the country and with other parts of the British Empire. These developments contributed to economic growth and improved connectivity.
Education System: The British introduced a modern education system in India. They established schools, colleges, and universities that provided access to Western knowledge and subjects. This led to the spread of English education and the emergence of a new intellectual class, contributing to social and intellectual advancements in India.
Legal and Administrative Framework: The British introduced a centralized administrative and legal system in India. They implemented institutions such as the Indian Civil Service, courts, and legislative bodies, which brought about a structured governance system. This framework laid the foundation for modern administrative and legal structures in independent India.
English Language: English became an official language during British rule and continues to be widely used in India today. The spread of English facilitated communication, trade, and provided access to global knowledge. English proficiency has also played a significant role in India's emergence as a major player in the global IT and services sectors.
Political Consciousness and Nationalism: British colonial rule sparked a sense of political consciousness among Indians and gave rise to nationalist movements. The struggle for independence against British rule united people from diverse backgrounds and eventually led to India's independence in 1947.
While India did benefit in certain aspects from its imperial partnership with Great Britain, it is important to note that colonial rule also had negative consequences, such as economic exploitation, cultural erosion, and social inequalities.
Know more about partnership with Great Britain here:
https://brainly.com/question/20380457
#SPJ11
5 example of dressmaker/tailor
Answer:
hope it's helps you have a great day keep smiling be happy stay safeWhat was Isaac Newton interested in when he was a young boy
Answer: When Isaac Newton was a young boy he was more interested in making mechanical devices than studying.
CREDIT: Garden Of Praise
What conditions did Dorothea Dix help to reform?
Answer:
Dorothea Dix played an instrumental role in the founding or expansion of more than 30 hospitals for the treatment of the mentally ill. She was a leading figure in those national and international movements that challenged the idea that people with mental disturbances could not be cured or helped.
Explanation:
Please mark me brainlest
Rome created a huge urban system. The integration of the Roman Empire was greatly facilitated by a
A. Good Portal system
B. transportation system
C. lack of languages
D. labor shortages
Answer:
B. transportation system
Hope this helps!
Which of the following was a disadvantage to the Chinese army fighting against the
Japanese?
Answer: Civil war between nationalist and communist
Explanation: I got it wrong heres the right one
were Men and children were the lowest paid laborers?
Answer:
Pay was extremely low for common workers during the industrial revolution. $1.00 to $1.50 was the typical pay for men workers while women were paid less and children the least.
Explanation:
So yea they were
Under the Freedmen's Bureau some Southern land was redistributed for African American
ownership
true
false
Answer:true
Explanation:
Chloride is the ion found at the highest concentration in salt water. The concentration is high because
Answer:
Chloride is the ion found at the highest concentration in salt water. The concentration is high because
Use your knowledge don't copy from somewhere else
Why is Holocaust the most well known example of genocide in the western world?
Answer:
The Holocaust killed a lot of Jews. A lot. So that can explain why Holocaust is a example of a genocide.
Explanation:
Some of the fears the Mexican American families faced when they filed the lawsuit....
1. As part of his reforms, Reagan the government regulation of business.
2. A major social issue he addressed was stopping the sale of illegal .
3 & 4. Reagan also named new justices to the Supreme Court. One of his appointments was noteworthy for being the first justice.
1. Decreased, 2. Drugs, 3. three, 4. Female
Answer:
1. Decreased, 2. Drugs, 3. three, 4. Female
Explanation:
Edge 2021
thank you person who posted the question!
In Reagan economic policy, government regulation decreased and addressed drugs abuse with female as first justice.
What is Reagan's economic policy?Reagan's economic policy servesas the policy that made adjust to income tax .
Regan, during his government made a female as the chief justice and reduced government spending.
Learn more about Reagan's economic policy at,;
https://brainly.com/question/24169400
#SPJ2
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND CASHAPP 15$
Answer: The Underground Railroad work by giving slaves and place to stay. The slaves went from house to house with a light in a window. Most of the houses had secret areas or false floors and carts. The slave would either get in one of the false floor area or get in the cart.
Harriet Tubman was the leader of the underground railroad. She would tell the slaves a certain time to go to each house.
paragraph of the first amendment
The most famous section of the Bill of Rights is the First Amendment. This right is so important, because it protects our rights to speech, press, petition, religion, and assembly. This freedom is extended even farther when we as citizens are granted the right to petition and assemble.
Explanation: