D. The cost to play the game is $2. The winner gets $6 for making purple. How much profit would the school make from 18 people playing the game?​

The correct option is (C) 23.7%.

If the coefficient of determination is 0.237, the percentage of the data about the regression line that is explained is 23.7%.

The coefficient of determination is used to explain how much variability in a dependent variable is due to the independent variable in a regression analysis.

It is usually represented as R², which is a fraction between 0 and 1, or expressed as a percentage between 0% and 100%.

It measures the proportion of variability in the dependent variable that can be attributed to the independent variable(s).

In this problem, the coefficient of determination is given as 0.237, which means that 23.7% of the variability in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable(s) in the regression line. Therefore, the correct option is (C) 23.7%.

To know more about the coefficient of determination visit:

https://brainly.in/question/10394672

#SPJ11

Heather receives $35 every six months from the corporate bond.

The correct answer to the given question is option D.

To calculate how much Heather receives every six months from the corporate bond, we need to determine the semi-annual interest payment.

The annual interest rate is given as seven percent. Since interest is paid semi-annually, we divide the annual interest rate by 2 to get the semi-annual interest rate:

Semi-annual interest rate = 7% / 2 = 3.5%

Next, we calculate the semi-annual interest payment by multiplying the face value of the bond ($1,000) by the semi-annual interest rate:

Semi-annual interest payment = $1,000 * 3.5% = $1,000 * 0.035 = $35

Therefore, Heather receives $35 every six months from the corporate bond.

For more such questions on corporate bond, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/14064867

#SPJ8

Answer:

y = 4x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a manufacture has been selling 1350 television sets a week at $480 each. A market survey indicates that for each $15 rebate offered to a buyer, the number of sets sold will increase by 150 per week.

a) The demand function is p(x) = 480 - 15x/150, Where x is the number of television sets sold per week.

b) The company should offer a rebate of $25 to maximize its revenue.

c) The company should offer a rebate of $23 to maximize its profit.

a) Demand function:

p(x) = 480 - 15x/150, Where x is the number of television sets sold per week.

b) To maximize revenue, we need to find the point where the marginal revenue equals zero.

Marginal revenue is the derivative of the revenue function.

Revenue function is given by R(x) = x p(x), where x is the number of television sets sold and p(x) is the price per set.

R(x) = x p(x)

R(n) = (1350 + 150n)(480 - 15n/150)

R(n) = 648000 - 2250n - 45n²

R’(n) = -2250 - 90n

For marginal revenue, we need

R’(n) = 0

2250 - 90n = 0

n = -2250/90

n = -25

So, the company should offer a rebate of $25 to maximize its revenue.

c) Cost function: C(x) = 108000 + 160x

Total revenue (TR) = x p(x)

= (1350 + 150n)(480 - 15n/150)

= 648000 - 2250n - 45n²

Total cost (TC) = C(x)

= 108000 + 160n

Profit (P) = TR - TCP

P = 648000 - 2250n - 45n² - (108000 + 160n)

P = 540000 - 2090n - 45n²

For maximum profit, we need

P’(n) = 0 -2090 - 90n

P'(n) = 0

2090 - 90n = 0

n = -2090/90

n = -23.2

Since n has to be a whole number, the number of TVs sold will be

1350 + 150n = 1350 + 150(-23)

= 1020.

Therefore, the company should offer a rebate of $23 to maximize its profit.

To know more about revenue, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32151902

#SPJ11

The first statement focuses on the existence of a single solution that works for all problems, while the second statement emphasizes that for each problem, there is at least one solution available, without specifying whether it is the same solution for all problems.

1) ∃x∀yS(x, y):

This statement means "There exists at least one solution that works for all problems." In other words, there is a specific value of x that can be applied to every problem y, resulting in a solution.

2) ∀y∃xS(x, y):

This statement means "For every problem, there exists at least one solution." In other words, for any given problem y, there is at least one value of x that can be applied to it to find a solution.

The main distinction between these two statements lies in the order of quantifiers (∃ and ∀). In the first statement, the existential quantifier (∃x) appears before the universal quantifier (∀y), indicating that there is a single solution that can be applied to all problems.

In the second statement, the universal quantifier (∀y) appears before the existential quantifier (∃x), indicating that for each problem, there is at least one solution that exists.

Learn more about Existential Quantifier at

brainly.com/question/31820796

#SPJ4

a. The 90% confidence interval for the true population mean watermelon weight is 30.41 to 35.59 ounces.

b. The 99% confidence interval for the true population mean turtle weight is 54.56 to 57.44 ounces.

c. The 99% confidence interval for the true population mean textbook weight is 56.884 to 67.116 ounces.

d. The 99% confidence interval for the true population proportion of people with kids is 0.464 to 0.576.

e. The 99% confidence interval for the true population proportion of people with kids is 0.585 to 0.675.

a. For the watermelon weights:

Sample mean (m) = 33 ounces

Population standard deviation (σ) = 7.7 ounces

Sample size (n) = 47

Confidence level = 90%

To construct the confidence interval, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = m ± Z * (σ/√n)

Where Z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level. For a 90% confidence level, Z = 1.645 (obtained from the standard normal distribution table).

Confidence Interval = 33 ± 1.645 * (7.7/√47)

Confidence Interval ≈ 33 ± 2.586

Confidence Interval ≈ (30.41, 35.59) ounces

The 90% confidence interval for the true population mean watermelon weight is 30.41 to 35.59 ounces.

b. For the turtle weights:

Sample mean (m) = 56 ounces

Population standard deviation (σ) = 2.9 ounces

Sample size (n) = 21

Confidence level = 99%

Using the same formula as above and considering a 99% confidence level, the z-score is Z = 2.576.

Confidence Interval = 56 ± 2.576 * (2.9/√21)

Confidence Interval ≈ 56 ± 1.438

Confidence Interval ≈ (54.56, 57.44) ounces

The 99% confidence interval for the true population mean turtle weight is 54.56 to 57.44 ounces.

c. For the textbook weights:

Sample mean (m) = 62 ounces

Population standard deviation (σ) = 9.4 ounces

Sample size (n) = 34

Confidence level = 99%

Using the same formula as above and considering a 99% confidence level, the z-score is Z = 2.576.

Confidence Interval = 62 ± 2.576 * (9.4/√34)

Confidence Interval ≈ 62 ± 5.116

Confidence Interval ≈ (56.884, 67.116) ounces

The 99% confidence interval for the true population mean textbook weight is 56.884 to 67.116 ounces.

d. For the proportion of people with kids:

Number of people with kids (p) = 104

Sample size (n) = 200

Confidence level = 99%

To construct the confidence interval for a proportion, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = p ± Z * √[(p(1-p))/n]

Using the z-score corresponding to a 99% confidence level (Z = 2.576), we can calculate the confidence interval.

Confidence Interval = 104/200 ± 2.576 * √[(104/200)(1 - 104/200)/200]

Confidence Interval ≈ 0.52 ± 0.056

Confidence Interval ≈ (0.464, 0.576)

The 99% confidence interval for the true population proportion of people with kids is 0.464 to 0.576.

e. For the proportion of people with kids:

Number of people with kids (p) = 189

Sample size (n) = 300

Confidence level = 99%

Using the same formula as above and considering a 99% confidence level, the z-score is Z = 2.576.

Confidence Interval = 189/300 ± 2.576 * √[(189/300)(1 - 189/300)/300]

Confidence Interval ≈ 0.63 ± 0.045

Confidence Interval ≈ (0.585, 0.675)

The 99% confidence interval for the true population proportion of people with kids is 0.585 to 0.675.

Learn more about confidence interval at https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

Answer: Kianna is incorrect, if Elena’s house was a reflection of her house across the y-axis, the coordinates would be (-4,2).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i dont know i just want points

Step-by-step explanation:

>;)

Answer:

s would be 20

Step-by-step explanation:

because 2 x 10 = 20 so you then would add the second 20 to the first 20 and get 40

Answer:

480 - 12.25d = 50

Answer:

65

Step-by-step explanation:

all triangles angles equal 180°

180-72-43=65

Mark's approach to solving the problem is incorrect.

We have,

To find the sum of percentages, you cannot simply add the numbers together as you would with regular numbers.

Percentages represent proportions or ratios, so they must be converted to their corresponding decimal or fraction forms before adding them.

To solve 12% + 3%, you need to convert each percentage to its decimal form and then add the decimals together.

Here's the correct approach:

12% = 12/100 = 0.12

3% = 3/100 = 0.03

Now, add the decimals:

0.12 + 0.03 = 0.15

Therefore,

The value of 12% + 3% is 0.15 or 15%.

Learn more about percentages here:

https://brainly.com/question/11403063

#SPJ1

(a) An example of an infinite field such that 4-a -o for all e F is F_2.

Here, the only elements of the field are 0 and 1, and we have 1 + 1 = 0,

which is equivalent to 4 - 1 - 1 = 2 - 1 - 1 = 0. Therefore, for all a e F_2, 4 - a - a = 0, so F_2 satisfies the given condition.

(b) An example of an infinite, non-commutative ring R such that for all a we have that 2a = 0 is the ring of 2x2 matrices over the field F_2 (as defined in part (a)). If we identify the matrix \begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix} with the element ad + bc of F_2, then R becomes a ring.

Note that R is not commutative since the product of two matrices is not necessarily equal to the product of their entries, and that 2a = 0 for all matrices \begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix} in R since \begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\0&0\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}0&a\\0&c\end{pmatrix} and \begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\1&0\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}b&0\\d&0\end{pmatrix} have entries that are equal to 0 in F_2. Therefore, R satisfies the given condition.

To know more about infinite refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/3928632

#SPJ11

Answer:

-8 i think

Hope you get it right

Answer:

the absolute value of -l8| is 8

Step-by-step explanation:

Absolute value means the opposite

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4(2x+10)=0

8x+40=0

-40       -40

8x=-40

x=-5

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

First you have to distribute 4 to 2x and 10, giving us 8x + 40 = 0. Then subtract 40 from both sides, giving us 8x = -40. Now divide -40 by 8, which gives us -5.

Answer:

the center of this circle is (8, -4) and the radius is 2√3.

Step-by-step explanation:

Compare this equation

(x - 8) + (y + 4) = 12      Don't forget to type in the " ^ " symbol to indicate exponentiation.

(x - 8)^2 + (y + 4)^2 = 12

to the standard equation of a circle with center at (h, k) and radius r:

(x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 = r^2

In this way we learn that h = 8, k = -4 and r^2 = 12 (or r = 2√3).

Then the center of this circle is (8, -4) and the radius is 2√3.

Perpendicular means that two lines intersect at a right angle.

D and E have perpendicular sides

(blue rectangle at the bottom left and green trapezoid all the way at the bottom right)

No, her estimate is too high.

Given,

Lavonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70 by 0.4 to get 28 .

Now

Firstly calculate the actual answer:

38% of 63

= 38/100 * 63

= 23.94

Now

The approximated portion :

40% of 70

= 0.4 *70

= 28

Hence the answer should be around 24 but after approximation it is coming 28 .

Thus the estimate made by Lavonne is high .

Know more about estimation,

https://brainly.com/question/28998959

#SPJ4

The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly different from 43 at α = 0.05.

To determine whether the average number of days between haircuts for college students is smaller than the average for the average American (43 days), we can conduct a one-sample t-test. Here are the steps and results:

Step 1: Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The population mean number of days between haircuts for college students is equal to 43.

Alternative hypothesis (H1): The population mean number of days between haircuts for college students is smaller than 43.

Step 2: Calculate the test statistic:

We can calculate the test statistic using the formula:

t = (x- μ) / (s / √n)

where x is the sample mean, μ is the hypothesised population mean (43), s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Using the given data, the sample mean x is calculated to be 39.923, the sample standard deviation s is 6.106, and the sample size n is 13.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

t = (39.923 - 43) / (6.106 / √13) = -0.808

Step 3: Calculate the p-value:

The p-value represents the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as the observed value (or more extreme) if the null hypothesis is true. We can use the t-distribution to calculate the p-value.

Using a t-table or a statistical software, we find that the p-value for t = -0.808 with 12 degrees of freedom is approximately 0.438.

Step 4: Make a decision:

Comparing the p-value (0.438) to the significance level α (0.05), we find that the p-value is greater than α.

Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Based on the results, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean number of days between haircuts for college students is lower than 43. The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly different from 43 at α = 0.05.

Learn more about population mean here, https://brainly.com/question/28103278

#SPJ11

Answer:

-5p+3

Step-by-step explanation:

-p-2-4p+5

-p-4p-2+5

-5p+3

Answer:

A is incorrect!  B. should be the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation

After some research, i found that the correct answer is most likely B.  a regression line and trend line are equivalent terms

A trendline and a regression can be the same.

A regression line is based upon the best fitting curve Y= a + bX Most often it’s a least-squares fit (where the squared distances from the points to the line (along the Y-axis) is minimized).

It can be quadratic or logistic or otherwise, but most often it is linear.

A trendline is often constructed by smoothing of the results, making it less peaked. (often by using a moving average); but can also come from ARIMA projections or curve fitting techniques (such as regression).

Let me know if i helped you!

The statement that is true about a trend line is B. A regression line and trend line are equivalent terms.

It should be noted that the trend line doesn't represent only the largest data points. It can also represent the smallest data points.

The regression line and the trend line are not opposite terms but rather, the regression line and trend line are equivalent terms.

In conclusion, the correct option is B.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/20937091

Answer:

3.142 × 6 = 18.852, thats : 19cm, then multiply 19 by 6 , so 19 would go in the square.

because area of a circle is p × r sq. u multiply one of the 6 by 3.142, you get 19, then multiply that 19 by the other 6. the answer is approximately 113.112.

(a) The estimated coefficient of X₂ captures the average impact of X₂ on the response variable Y, given the specified regression model. (b) a higher R² value indicates a better fit of the model to the data and a higher degree of explained variability.

(a.) The estimated coefficient of X₂ in the multiple linear regression equation (Y = 8 + 45X₁ + 16X₂) represents the expected change in the dependent variable (Y) for a one-unit increase in the independent variable X₂, while holding all other independent variables constant.

In this case, the estimated coefficient of X₂ is 16, so for every one-unit increase in X₂, the expected change in Y is an increase of 16 units, assuming X₁ and other variables remain constant.

(b.) The coefficient of determination (R²) is a measure of the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable (Y) that can be explained by the independent variables (X₁ and X₂) in the regression model. In this case, if the R² value is 0.98, it means that approximately 98% of the total variation in Y can be explained by the linear relationship between X₁, X₂, and the constant term.

A high R² value of 0.98 indicates a very strong fit of the regression model to the data. It suggests that 98% of the variability in the dependent variable Y is accounted for by the independent variables X₁ and X₂, while the remaining 2% may be attributed to other factors or random variation.

To learn more about Coefficient here: https://brainly.com/question/1038771

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

function A : y = 50 + 0.5x ; y = 40 + 0.6x

Step-by-step explanation:

Function is a relationship between values in set x & set y.

In case functional relationship equation is y = c + sx . c is the y intercept ie constant value of y when x = 0, & s is slope rate of change ie = change in y / change in x.

If function A is y = 50 + 0.5x. Intercept (c) = 50 , change rate (slope) = 0.5

If function B is y = 40 + 0.6x. Intercept (c) = 40 ie lesser, change rate (slope) = 0.6 ie greater

The differential equation governing the variation of the charge (c) in the given RC circuit is 2(d^2q/dt^2) + (1/0.5)(dq/dt) = d(E(t))/dt, where q represents the charge, t represents time, and E(t) represents the electromotive force of the circuit. This equation describes the relationship between the charge, current, and voltage in the RC circuit.

To compute the differential equation governing the variation of the charge (c) in the given RC circuit, we can start by using Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) and the relationship between charge, capacitance, and voltage.

Kirchhoff's voltage law states that the sum of the voltages in a closed loop in a circuit is equal to zero. In this case, the voltage across the resistor (VR) and the voltage across the capacitor (VC) must sum up to the electromotive force (E) of the circuit.

The voltage across the resistor can be calculated using Ohm's Law: VR = IR, where I is the current flowing through the circuit.

The voltage across the capacitor can be calculated using the formula: VC = (1 / C) ∫Idt, where ∫Idt represents the integral of the current over time.

Combining these equations, we have:

E(t) = VR + VC

E(t) = IR + (1 / C) ∫Idt

Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to time, we get:

d(E(t)) / dt = d(IR) / dt + d((1 / C) ∫Idt) / dt

Since the resistance R and the capacitance C are constant values, their derivatives with respect to time are zero.

d(E(t)) / dt = R(dI / dt) + (1 / C)(I)

Substituting I with dq / dt, where q represents the charge c, we get:

d(E(t)) / dt = R(d^2q / dt^2) + (1 / C)(dq / dt)

Simplifying the equation, we obtain the differential equation governing the variation of c:

R(d^2q / dt²) + (1 / C)(dq / dt) = d(E(t)) / dt

In summary, the differential equation governing the variation of the charge (c) in the given RC circuit is:

2(d^2q / dt²) + (1 / 0.5)(dq / dt) = d(E(t)) / dt

To know more about differential equation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/2273154#

#SPJ11

Approximately 4.28% of the seats are filled in the stadium when there are 19,624 people in attendance. To determine the percentage of seats filled in the stadium, we need to calculate the ratio of the number of people in attendance to the total number of seats and then convert it to a percentage.

The number of seats filled can be found by subtracting the number of empty seats from the total number of seats. Using the given information:

Number of seats filled = Total number of seats - Number of empty seats

Number of seats filled = 20,502 - 19,624

Number of seats filled = 878

Now, we can calculate the percentage of seats filled by dividing the number of seats filled by the total number of seats and multiplying by 100:

Percentage of seats filled = (Number of seats filled / Total number of seats) * 100

Percentage of seats filled = (878 / 20,502) * 100

Percentage of seats filled ≈ 4.28%

For more such questions on percentage

https://brainly.com/question/29775174

#SPJ8

Step-by-step explanation:

area of a quadrilateral is b x h

if the base is 7 the height is x and the area is 63 then:

7x=63

divide both sides by 7

7/7x=63/7

x=9

Hope that helps :)