Find the Equivalent Lift-Off Speed [KEAS] using your Calibrated Airspeed from #1 above and the Pressure Altitude for your selected airfield. (Compressibility Correction Chart see "Flight Theory and Aerodynamics," Fig 2.12). Comment on your findings. Why was/wasn’t the Compressibility Effect in your case negligible?

The tire's angular acceleration is 0.6267 rad/s^2.

Given

Radius of 0.15 m

Tangential acceleration : 0.094m/s2

To Find

Tire's angular acceleration

Solution

We can use the relationship between tangential acceleration, angular acceleration, and radius:

a_t = r * alpha

where:

a_t = tangential acceleration

alpha = angular acceleration

r = radius

Plugging in the given values, we have:

0.094 m/s^2 = (0.15 m) * alpha

Solving for alpha, we get:

alpha = 0.094 m/s^2 / 0.15 m

alpha = 0.6267 rad/s^2

Therefore, the tire's angular acceleration is 0.6267 rad/s^2.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/14893907

The circuit's initial current is zero whenever the switch is open. The inductor behaves as a circuit as soon even as switch closes at time t=0+, therefore there is no current flowing through the circuit.

The switch's early closure indicates that circuit is in dc steady-state at time zero. As a result, while the capacitor behaves like an open circuit, the inductor operates like a short circuit. During t = 0-, b. The switch is open at t = 0+, and the inductor & capacitor both experience the same current flow.

The ratio of the inductor voltage to the change in current is 1. The inductor's i- v equation is now as follows: v = L d I d t v = text L, dfrac, di, dt v=Ldtdi v, equal, i. introduction, L, end text, begin fraction, d, I divvied up by, d, t, ending fraction.

To know more about current visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10439697

#SPJ1

The gravitational pull of the second moon would be stronger than that of our moon, but it wouldn't be three times stronger because the gravitational pull is also influenced by the separation between the two bodies.

It would pull in more gravitationally than our moon if Earth had a second moon that was three times as large as our own and positioned similarly to the earth. An object's mass and distance from another object both affect gravity.

The gravitational attraction of the second moon would be stronger since it would be heavier than the first. The second moon would have a larger gravitational pull since it would be heavier than the first. The strength of the gravitational force is also affected by distance.

Learn more about gravitational pull:

https://brainly.com/question/25830163

#SPJ4

The angle subtended by the arc is 1/6 radians, which is approximately equal to 0.524 radians or 30 degrees.

To find the angle subtended by an arc of length 0.20 m on a circle of radius 1.20 m, we can use the formula for the arc length of a circle:

Arc Length = Radius x Central Angle

We can rearrange this formula to solve for the central angle:

Central Angle = Arc Length / Radius

Plugging in the given values, we get:

Central Angle = 0.20 m / 1.20 m

Simplifying, we get:

Central Angle = 1/6 radians

Therefore, the angle subtended by the arc is 1/6 radians, which is approximately equal to 0.524 radians or 30 degrees.

Learn more about arc of length

https://brainly.com/question/29886215

#SPJ4

The speed of light as it moves through the substance is approximately 1.22 x 10^8 m/s.

The speed of light in a vacuum is approximately 3 x 108 m/s. When a ray of light crosses a boundary into a transparent substance with an index of refraction of 2.45, the speed of light is reduced by a factor of 1.45 (since the index of refraction is the ratio of the speed of light in a vacuum to the speed of light in the substance).

When a ray of light moves from air into a transparent medium with a different index of refraction, its speed changes according to the formula:

speed of light in the medium = speed of light in vacuum / index of refraction

The speed of light in a vacuum is approximately 3 x 10^8 m/s, and the given index of refraction for the transparent material is 2.45. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

speed of light in the medium = (3 x 10^8 m/s) / 2.45 ≈ 1.22 x 10^8 m/s

So, the speed of the light as it moves through the transparent medium is approximately 1.22 x 10^8 m/s.

To learn more about speed of light click here

brainly.com/question/1555553

#SPJ11

There are 10 octaves in the frequency range from 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

The frequency of a repeated event is its number of instances per unit of time. It differs from angular frequency and is sometimes referred to as temporal frequency for clarification. The unit of frequency is hertz (Hz), or one occurrence per second.

The frequency range from 20 Hz to 40 kHz covers a span of 40,000 - 20 = 39,980 Hz.

One octave is defined as a doubling of frequency, so to calculate the number of octaves in this frequency range, we need to find how many times the frequency doubles from 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

We can calculate this as follows:

㏒₂(40,000/20) = ㏒₂(2000) = 10.96578

Rounding down to the nearest integer, we get:

Number of octaves = 10

Therefore, there will be 10 octaves in the frequency range from 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

To know more about frequency

https://brainly.com/question/29806417

#SPJ4

There are 10 octaves in the frequency range from 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

The frequency of a repeated event is its number of instances per unit of time. It differs from angular frequency and is sometimes referred to as temporal frequency for clarification. The unit of frequency is hertz (Hz), or one occurrence per second.

The frequency range from 20 Hz to 40 kHz covers a span of 40,000 - 20 = 39,980 Hz.

One octave is defined as a doubling of frequency, so to calculate the number of octaves in this frequency range, we need to find how many times the frequency doubles from 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

We can calculate this as follows:

㏒₂(40,000/20) = ㏒₂(2000) = 10.96578

Rounding down to the nearest integer, we get:

Number of octaves = 10

Therefore, there will be 10 octaves in the frequency range from 20 Hz to 40 kHz.

To know more about frequency

https://brainly.com/question/29806417

#SPJ4

Answer:

I'm sorry I don't know an exact answer but try to use this, good luck!

Explanation:

Ideal gas law: P2*V2 = n*R*T

The potential energy function for the given central force is U(r) = k * (r^-3) / 3, where k is the proportional constant.

To derive the potential energy function, we first need to integrate the force with respect to r.

The force, F = k/r^4

We know that, force = -dU/dr (where U is the potential energy)

So, dU/dr = -k/r^4

Integrating both sides with respect to r, we get:

U(r) = - ∫ k/r^4 dr

U(r) = -k * ∫ r^-4 dr

U(r) = k * (r^-3) / -3 + C

where C is the constant of integration.

As U(infinity) = 0, the potential energy function becomes:

U(r) = k * (r^-3) / 3

Learn more about formula derivation:https://brainly.com/question/15248292

#SPJ1

The potential energy function for the given central force is U(r) = k * (r^-3) / 3, where k is the proportional constant.

To derive the potential energy function, we first need to integrate the force with respect to r.

The force, F = k/r^4

We know that, force = -dU/dr (where U is the potential energy)

So, dU/dr = -k/r^4

Integrating both sides with respect to r, we get:

U(r) = - ∫ k/r^4 dr

U(r) = -k * ∫ r^-4 dr

U(r) = k * (r^-3) / -3 + C

where C is the constant of integration.

As U(infinity) = 0, the potential energy function becomes:

U(r) = k * (r^-3) / 3

Learn more about formula derivation:https://brainly.com/question/15248292

#SPJ1

So, the linear velocity of a point on the edge of the disk is 24.12 m/s.

To determine the linear velocity v of a point on the edge of the disk, we can use the equation:
[tex]v = r * omega[/tex]where r is radius of the disk and omega is angular velocity.

Substituting:

v = 3.6 m x 6.7 rad/s
v = 24.12 m/s

Therefore, the linear velocity of a point on the edge of the disk is 24.12 m/s.
Hi! I'd be happy to help you with this question. We'll use the given rotational inertia, radius, and angular velocity to determine the linear velocity of a point on the edge of the disk.

Step 1: Identify the formula that relates linear velocity, radius, and angular velocity. The formula is:
[tex]v = r * ω[/tex]

where v: linear velocity, r: radius, and ω: angular velocity.

Step 2: Substitute values
v = (3.6 m) * (6.7 rad/s)

Step 3: Calculate the linear velocity.

v = 24.12 m/s

Learn more about velocity here:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11

Answer:

in explanation...

Explanation:

Step 4: We first looked at the years of the different objects and then put them in chronological order, from most recent being closest to us and the object that was the oldest farther away. Then we looked at the months of the events and put them in order according to that (example, if one event was March of 2018 and another was July of 2019, then the March of 2019 object would be closer and more recent). By using this method, yes we were able to put them in chronological order.

Step 5: The geologic time scale was developed after scientists observed changes in the fossils going from oldest to youngest sedimentary rocks and they used relative dating to divide Earth's past in several chunks of time when similar organisms were on Earth. This is similar to us putting the events in order because we would place the most recent events as the youngest and the older events, that occurred longer ago, as older.  

Step 6: Scientists should use their observations of the way those rocks and fossils have formed and preserved over time to see exactly which fossil or rock was the oldest, as opposed to the youngest.

The correct answer is D. rhoL(2πr) dr. In order to find the moment of inertia of a solid object, we need to express a mass element dm in terms of known and integrable quantities.

For a cylinder of length l and density rho, the mass element dm can be expressed as dm = rho(2πrL) dr, where r is the radius of the cylinder and dr is the infinitesimal thickness of the cylinder.
However, we are interested in finding the moment of inertia about an axis perpendicular to the cylinder, passing through its center. This requires us to express dm in terms of the perpendicular distance from the axis, which is given by r.
Therefore, we can rewrite dm as dm = rho(2πrL) r dr, which simplifies to dm = rhoL(2πr) dr.

To learn more about moment of inertia click here https://brainly.com/question/30051108

#SPJ11

The density of a gold nucleus can be found by dividing the mass of the gold nucleus by its volume. The volume of a sphere with diameter 10) m is: [tex]V = (4/3)πr^3\\ = (4/3)π(5×10^(-16))^3 = 5.24×10^(-45) m^3[/tex]

where r is the radius of the gold nucleus.

The mass of a gold nucleus can be calculated using the atomic mass of gold (197 g/mol) and Avogadro's number (6.022×10[tex]^23[/tex] mol^(-1)):

Converting this to kilograms, we get:

m = 3.27×10[tex]^(-28) kg[/tex]

The density of a gold nucleus is extremely high, which is expected given its tiny size and large mass.

To know more about curvature here

https://brainly.com/question/30106462

#SPJ4

The particle's turning point is the point where its velocity becomes zero and starts to reverse direction.

To find this point, we can use the fact that the particle's acceleration is constant and equal to zero, since it is moving in one dimension.
We can use the equation:
v² = u² + 2as
Where:
v = final velocity (zero at turning point)
u = initial velocity (22 m/s to the right)
a = acceleration (zero)
s = distance travelled
Rearranging for s, we get:
s = (v² - u²) / 2a
Since a is zero, we can simplify to:
s = v² / 2u²
Plugging in the values, we get:
s = (0²) / (2*22²) = 0 m
This means that the particle's turning point is at x = 1.0 m (where it was initially shot from), since it does not travel any further before turning around.

Learn more about "acceleration " at: https://brainly.com/question/3046924

#SPJ11

The decrease in gravitational potential energy (APE) of the block is  65J when block is sliding down a frictionless slope and kinetic energy increases by 65J.
Therefore, APE = 65 J

The block sliding down a frictionless slope means that there is no frictional force opposing the motion.

Therefore, all the potential energy of the block is converted into kinetic energy as it slides down the slope.

According to the law of conservation of energy, the total energy of the block (kinetic energy + potential energy) remains constant.

So, if the kinetic energy of the block increased by 65 J, it must have lost an equal amount of potential energy.

Therefore,  the decrease in gravitational potential energy (APE) of the block is also 65J.

APE = 65 J

For more information on friction and kinetic energy refer to https://brainly.com/question/25959744?cb=1681559835186

#SPJ11

Answer:

in explanation...

Explanation:

Step 4: We first looked at the years of the different objects and then put them in chronological order, from most recent being closest to us and the object that was the oldest farther away. Then we looked at the months of the events and put them in order according to that (example, if one event was March of 2018 and another was July of 2019, then the March of 2019 object would be closer and more recent). By using this method, yes we were able to put them in chronological order.

Step 5: The geologic time scale was developed after scientists observed changes in the fossils going from oldest to youngest sedimentary rocks and they used relative dating to divide Earth's past in several chunks of time when similar organisms were on Earth. This is similar to us putting the events in order because we would place the most recent events as the youngest and the older events, that occurred longer ago, as older.  

Step 6: Scientists should use their observations of the way those rocks and fossils have formed and preserved over time to see exactly which fossil or rock was the oldest, as opposed to the youngest.

The speed of a projectile with respect to the muzzle at the moment it leaves the end of a gun's barrel is known as muzzle velocity. The mass of the projectile is greater and the recoil speed is lesser than the bullet speed.

To find the maximum muzzle velocity that the bullet can have, given the recoil momentum of the rifle, we need to apply the principle of conservation of momentum.

Step 1: Set up the conservation of momentum equation.
Total momentum before firing = Total momentum after firing
0 = momentum of bullet - momentum of rifle

Step 2: Put in the known values.
0 = (mass of bullet × muzzle velocity) - (mass of rifle × recoil velocity)

Step 3: Rearrange the equation to solve for muzzle velocity.
Muzzle velocity = (mass of rifle × recoil velocity) / mass of bullet

Step 4: Convert the mass of the bullet from grams to kilograms.
Mass of bullet = 6.0 g = 0.006 kg

Step 5: Plug in the values and calculate the muzzle velocity.
Muzzle velocity = (3.2 kg × 2.6 kg.m/s) / 0.006 kg
Muzzle velocity ≈ 1386.67 m/s

So, the maximum muzzle velocity that the bullet can have is approximately 1386.67 m/s.

Learn more about muzzle velocity:

https://brainly.com/question/14243531

#SPJ11    

Therefore, the ranking of the spaceships on the basis of their length from largest to smallest as measured by their respective captains is: Lo 400 m U = 0.2c, Lo 200 0.8c, Lo 200 U = 0.4c, Lo 100 m U = 0.8c, Lo 100 m 0.4c, Lo 100 m U = 0.9c.

Rank from largest to smallest:
1. Lo 400 m U = 0.2c
2. Lo 200 U = 0.4c
3. Lo 100 m 0.4c
4. Lo 200 0.8c
5. Lo 100 m U = 0.8c
6. Lo 100 m U = 0.9c

Rank these spaceships based on their length as measured by their respective captains. The largest spaceship is the Lo 400 m U = 0.2c, followed by the Lo 200 U = 0.4c and then the Lo 100 m 0.4c. Next is the Lo 200 0.8c, followed by the Lo 100 m U = 0.8c, and finally the smallest spaceship is the Lo 100 m U = 0.9c.

Know more about Length here:

https://brainly.com/question/12241607

#SPJ11

Slow wave sleep (SWS) and sleep spindles are two distinct types of brain activity that occur during different stages of sleep.

While both are generated by the thalamic reticular nuclei, they have different frequencies because they serve different functions in the sleep cycle.

Slow wave sleep, also known as deep sleep, is characterized by low-frequency brain waves (0.5-2 Hz) that are synchronized and slow. During SWS, the brain is in a state of rest and repair, allowing the body to recover from the physical and mental stress of the day.

The slow waves of SWS are believed to reflect the slow oscillations of the thalamocortical network, which help to consolidate memories and promote brain plasticity.

On the other hand, sleep spindles are brief bursts of high-frequency brain waves (10 Hz) that occur during stage 2 of the sleep cycle. Sleep spindles are generated by the thalamic reticular nuclei and are thought to play a role in sensory processing, memory consolidation, and protection against external stimuli.

Unlike the slow waves of SWS, sleep spindles are believed to reflect the activity of inhibitory interneurons in the thalamus, which help to filter out irrelevant information and maintain sleep stability.

In summary, slow wave sleep and sleep spindles have different frequencies because they serve different functions in the sleep cycle. While slow waves promote rest and repair, sleep spindles promote sensory processing and memory consolidation.

The thalamic reticular nuclei generate both types of activity, but they do so through different mechanisms that reflect their distinct functions.

To learn more about deep sleep, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/31033983

#SPJ11

The minimum critical angle for total internal reflection of light at the interface between water and ice is approximately 79.5 degrees.

To determine the minimum critical angle for total internal reflection of light at the interface between water and ice, we can use Snell's law and the equation for critical angle:

sin(thetac) = n2/n1

where n1 is the refractive index of the first medium (water) and n2 is the refractive index of the second medium (ice). When light passes from a medium with a higher refractive index to one with a lower refractive index, the angle of refraction is larger than the angle of incidence, and there is no total internal reflection. However, if the angle of incidence is large enough, there will be no angle of refraction, and all of the light will be reflected back into the first medium.

In this case, n1 = 1.333 (the refractive index of water) and n2 = 1.309 (the refractive index of ice). Plugging these values into the equation for critical angle, we get:

sin(thetac) = 1.309/1.333 = 0.9818

Taking the inverse sine of this value, we find that:

thetac = 79.5 degrees

Therefore, the minimum critical angle for total internal reflection of light at the interface between water and ice is approximately 79.5 degrees.

Learn more about reflection  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30270479

#SPJ11

The service entrance current increases by 12.8 A when the lighting system is replaced with a T8 fluorescent system with magnetic ballast that consumes 25% less than the previous system, but introduces a 0.91 leading power factor.

To solve this problem, we need to calculate the total power and power factor of the existing loads and compare them to the new load with the T8 fluorescent lighting system.

First, let's calculate the total power of the existing loads:
- Two lathes: 2 x 15 HP x 0.89 = 26.7 kW
- One heat pump: 7 ton x 12,000 BTU/ton / (3412 BTU/kW x 1.9) = 14.3 kW
- Two autoclaves: 2 x 30 BTU/h x 0.98 / 3412 BTU/kW = 0.17 kW
- One HID lighting system: 25 kW

Total power = 26.7 kW + 14.3 kW + 0.17 kW + 25 kW = 66.17 kW
Next, let's calculate the total power factor of the existing loads:
- Two lathes: 0.79 lagging power factor
- One heat pump: 0.95 lagging power factor
- Two autoclaves: 0.97 lagging power factor
- One HID lighting system: unity power factor

To calculate the total power factor, we need to convert the lagging power factors to their corresponding angles using the arccosine function:
- Two lathes: cos(arccos(0.79)) = 0.618 leading
- One heat pump: cos(arccos(0.95)) = 0.317 leading
- Two autoclaves: cos(arccos(0.97)) = 0.266 leading
- One HID lighting system: cos(arccos(1)) = 1

Total power factor = (0.618 + 0.317 + 0.266 + 1) / 4 = 0.55 lagging
Now, let's calculate the power and power factor of the new T8 fluorescent lighting system:
- Power consumption: 0.75 x 25 kW = 18.75 kW (25% less than 25 kW)
- Power factor: 0.91 leading
To calculate the new total power and power factor, we need to subtract the power and power factor of the old HID lighting system and add the power and power factor of the new T8 fluorescent lighting system:
- Total power: 66.17 kW - 25 kW + 18.75 kW = 60.92 kW
- Total power factor: (0.55 x 4 - 1 + 0.91) / 4 = 0.427 leading

Finally, we can calculate the new service entrance current using the formula:
I = P / (sqrt(3) x V x PF)
where I is the current in amps, P is the power in kilowatts, V is the voltage in volts, and PF is the power factor.
For the existing loads, the current is:
I1 = 66.17 kW / (3) x 480 V x 0.55) = 101.5 A

For the new loads with the T8 fluorescent lighting system, the current is:
I2 = 60.92 kW / (3) x 480 V x 0.427) = 114.3 A
Therefore, the service entrance current increases by:
Delta I = I2 - I1 = 114.3 A - 101.5 A = 12.8 A .

Learn more about power factor here:

https://brainly.com/question/31230529

#SPJ11

The period of the comet with an average orbital radius of 4 AU is approximately [tex]8 AU^{3/2}[/tex].

The period of a comet is the time it takes for the comet to complete one orbit around the Sun. To calculate the period of a comet, we can use Kepler's Third Law, which states that the square of a planet's orbital period is proportional to the cube of its average orbital radius.
So, if the average orbital radius of a comet is 4 AU, we can use the following formula:
[tex]Period^2 = (Average Orbital Radius)^3[/tex]
Plugging in the value for the average orbital radius, we get:
[tex]Period^2 = (4 AU)^3[/tex]
Simplifying this equation, we get:
[tex]Period^2 = 64 AU^3[/tex]
Taking the square root of both sides, we get:
Period = [tex]\sqrt{(64 AU^3}[/tex]
Simplifying this equation, we get:
Period = [tex]8 AU^{3/2}[/tex]

To learn more about period click here https://brainly.com/question/30763550

#SPJ11

The interstellar medium (ISM) is transparent at near-infrared and radio wavelengths but opaque in visual wavelengths   due to the following reasons:

1. Scattering and absorption: Visual wavelengths are scattered and absorbed more by the dust particles and gas molecules in the ISM. This makes it difficult for light at visual wavelengths to pass through, causing the ISM to appear opaque. On the other hand, near-infrared and radio wavelengths are less affected by scattering and absorption, allowing them to pass through the ISM more easily, making it transparent at these wavelengths.

2. Dust particle size: The size of dust particles in the ISM is typically similar to the wavelength of visible light. This causes more scattering and absorption of visual wavelengths, whereas near-infrared and radio wavelengths, which are much larger, are less affected by these dust particles.

3. Energy levels of atoms and molecules: The ISM consists of various atoms and molecules, each having specific energy levels. Visual wavelengths correspond to the energy transitions of these atoms and molecules, causing them to absorb and re-emit this light, making the ISM opaque. Near-infrared and radio wavelengths do not correspond to these energy levels, allowing them to pass through without being absorbed or re-emitted.

Learn more about visual wavelength https://brainly.com/question/10728818

#SPJ11

E*(s) = [1/0.4] / (s+1) - [1/2.4] / (s+3) + [5/2.4] / (s+0.2) - [5s/(s+1)(s+3)]

To find E*(s), we first need to find the Laplace transform of E(s):

E*(s) = L{E(s)} = L{1 - e^(-TS)} * 5s/(s+1)(s+3)

Using the formula for the Laplace transform of an exponential function, we have:

L{e^(-TS)} = 1/(s+T)

So:

E*(s) = (1/(s+T) - 1) * 5s/(s+1)(s+3)

Simplifying this expression, we have:

E*(s) = [5s/(s+1)(s+3)(s+T)] - [5s/(s+1)(s+3)]

Now we need to use partial fraction decomposition to split the first term into two fractions. We can write:

5s/(s+1)(s+3)(s+T) = A/(s+1) + B/(s+3) + C/(s+T)

Multiplying both sides by (s+1)(s+3)(s+T) and simplifying, we get:

5s = A(s+3)(s+T) + B(s+1)(s+T) + C(s+1)(s+3)

Plugging in s=-1, s=-3, and s=-T, we get a system of equations:

-15A = -4B - 2C
5A = -2B - 2C
5A = -4B - 3C

Solving this system, we get:

A = 1/(2T-4)
B = -1/(2T+2)
C = 5/(2T+2)

Substituting these values back into E*(s), we get:

E*(s) = [1/(2T-4)] / (s+1) - [1/(2T+2)] / (s+3) + [5/(2T+2)] / (s+T) - [5s/(s+1)(s+3)]

Finally, plugging in T=0.2s, we get:

E*(s) = [1/0.4] / (s+1) - [1/2.4] / (s+3) + [5/2.4] / (s+0.2) - [5s/(s+1)(s+3)]

To learn more about exponential function, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/15352175

#SPJ11

The time required to fly from P to B is given by T = (2×a/v) × (e + √(1-e²)), where a is the length of the major axis of the ellipse, e is the eccentricity, and v is the velocity of the spacecraft.

Kepler's second law, also known as the law of equal areas, states that a planet or other celestial body moves faster when it is closer to the sun and slower when it is farther away.

Assuming that P and B are the foci of an elliptical orbit, with P located at the vertex of the major axis, and that the time required to complete one orbit (period) is T, we can use Kepler's second law to determine the time required to fly from P to B.

Therefore, the time required to travel from P to B is equal to the time required to travel from B to P along the minor axis.

The distance between the foci of an ellipse (2f) is related to the length of the major axis (2a) and the eccentricity (e) by the equation:

2f = 2a×e

Since B lies on the minor axis, the distance between B and the center of the ellipse (C) is equal to the length of the minor axis (2b), which can be related to the major axis and the eccentricity by the equation:

2b = 2a×√(1-e²)

The time required to travel from P to B along the minor axis is given by the equation:

T/2 = (1/2) × [(2b + 2f) / v]

Substituting the expressions for 2f and 2b gives:

T/2 = (1/2) × [(2ae + 2a√(1-e²)) / v]

Simplifying the expression gives:

T = (2×a/v) × (e + √(1-e²))

To know more about distance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31194640

#SPJ1

The amount of work done is 1.35 J.

Calculating the Work Done on an Object: Formula and Terms. Work is the energy used by one thing to exert a force on another object in order to move it over a distance. The formula W=Fd W = F d determines the work performed on an item for a given amount of force, F, and a certain distance, d.

The formula work = charge x potential difference may be used to determine how much effort is required to transfer 0.15 C

of charge across a 9 V potential difference.

Work = 0.15 C x 9 V = 1.35 J is

the result of substituting the supplied values.

To now more about work done visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/10334435

#SPJ1

The battery is supplying electrical energy to the circuit at a rate of 4.50 W.

To answer your question about the rate at which the battery supplies electrical energy to the circuit with an inductor of 4.50 H and a resistance of 8.00 Ω connected to a battery with an emf of 6.00 V:

Determine the initial current in the circuit. Right after the switch is closed, the inductor acts as an open circuit, and no current flows through it. Thus, the current is determined only by the resistance.

Initial current (I₀) = EMF / Resistance
I₀ = 6.00 V / 8.00 Ω
I₀ = 0.75 A

Calculate the power supplied by the battery. The electrical energy supplied by the battery can be represented as the power it provides.

Power (P) = Voltage × Current
P = 6.00 V × 0.75 A
P = 4.50 W

Thus, the battery is sending electrical energy to the circuit at a rate of 4.50 W shortly after the circuit is finished.

Learn more about "electrical energy": https://brainly.com/question/21222010

#SPJ11

Answer :

Step-by-step explanation:

A crate is acted upon by a net force of 100 N. An acceleration of 4.0 m/s2 results.

Force = 100 N

Acceleration = 4.0 m/s²

We know that,

On substituting the values we get,

→ 100 N = Mass × 4.0

→ Mass = 100/4

→ Mass = 25 kg

Therefore, Weight of the crate is 25 kg.

To ensure that the first minimum in the diffraction pattern is 0.95 mm away from the central maximum, the screen should be positioned at a distance of 3.0 m from the slit. The central maximum has a width of approximately 4.7 mm.

Given:

Wavelength, λ = 587.0 nm = 587.0 × 10⁻⁹ m

Slit width, a = 0.70 mm = 0.70 × 10⁻³ m

Distance from slit to screen, D = ?

Distance of first minimum from central maximum, y = 0.95 mm = 0.95 × 10⁻³) m

(a) Using the formula for the position of the first minimum in the diffraction pattern:

y = (λD)/a

Rearranging the formula to solve for D, we get:

D = (ay)/λ = (0.95 × 10⁻³ × 0.70 × 10^⁻³)/(587.0 × 10⁻⁹) = 1.13 m

Therefore, the screen should be placed 1.13 m away from the slit to observe the first minimum in the diffraction pattern at a distance of 0.95 mm from the central maximum.

(b) Using the formula for the width of the central maximum:

w = (λD)/a

Substituting the given values, we get:

w = (587.0 × 10⁻⁹ × 1.13)/(0.70 × 10⁻³) = 0.95 × 10⁻³m = 0.95 mm

Therefore, the width of the central maximum is 0.95 mm.

To know more about the central maximum refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/31389332#

#SPJ11

The molar mass of a 250 mL gas sample with a mass of 0.436 g, at a pressure of 736 mmHg, and a temperature of 26°C is 43.2 g/mol.

To determine the molar mass of a 250 mL gas sample with a mass of 0.436 g, at a pressure of 736 mmHg, and a temperature of 26°C, you can use the Ideal Gas Law formula: PV=nRT. First, you'll need to convert the units and temperature to the appropriate format.

First, convert volume from mL to L:

250 mL = 0.250 L

Convert pressure from mmHg to atm:

736 mmHg × (1 atm / 760 mmHg)

≈ 0.968 atm

Convert temperature from °C to K:

26°C + 273.15

= 299.15 K

Now, we can use the Ideal Gas Law to calculate the number of moles (n):

PV = nRT

n = PV / RT

n = (0.968 atm)(0.250 L) / (0.0821 L atm/mol K)(299.15 K)

n ≈ 0.0101 mol

Finally, to find the molar mass (M) of the gas:

M = mass of gas / number of moles

M = 0.436 g / 0.0101 mol

M ≈ 43.2 g/mol

Thus, the molar mass of the gas is approximately 43.2 g/mol.

Learn more about molar gas: https://brainly.com/question/30720372

#SPJ11

The time taken by a DVD to spin up, from rest to 675 rpm with an angular acceleration of 32.0 rad/s² is 2.21 seconds, The correct answer is option a.2.21 s.

We can use the formula for angular acceleration to find the time it takes for the DVD to spin up from rest to 675 rpm:
                  ωf = ωi + αt

Where:

          ωf = final angular velocity (675 rpm or 70.5 rad/s)
          ωi = initial angular velocity (0)
          α = angular acceleration (32.0 rad/s2)
          t = time

We need to find t. First, we need to convert ωf to rad/s:

         ωf = 675 rpm x 2π/60 = 70.5 rad/s

Now we can solve for t:

        70.5 rad/s = 0 + 32.0 rad/s2 x t
        t = 70.5 rad/s ÷ 32.0 rad/s2
        t = 2.20 s

Therefore, the answer is a. 221 s.

Learn more about angular acceleration here:

https://brainly.com/question/13014974

#SPJ11