Laura runs 6 miles in 50 minutes. At the same rate,how many miles would she run in 35 minutes?

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

5²+12²=25+144=169

square root of 169 = 13

Mean = 95.125

Variance = 198.90625

Standard deviation = 14.06,

Confidence interval = 95.125 +/- 3.45

To find the 95% confidence interval of the mean score for all bowlers in this league, we need to first calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation of the given data set.

The sample mean is calculated as follows:

mean = 95.125

The sample standard deviation is calculated as follows:

First, we need to calculate the variance of the data set, which is done by taking the sum of the squared differences between each score and the mean, and dividing by the sample size minus 1:

variance = 198.90625

The sample standard deviation is then the square root of the variance:

standard deviation = sqrt(198.90625)

standard deviation = 14.06

Now that we have the sample mean and sample standard deviation, we can use these values to calculate the 95% confidence interval of the mean score for all bowlers in this league.

We can use the following formula to calculate the confidence interval:

confidence interval = mean +/- (1.96 * (standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)))

Substituting in the values we calculated above, we get:

confidence interval = 95.125 +/- (1.96 * (14.06 / sqrt(40)))

Hence , confidence interval = 95.125 +/- 3.45

Learn more about normal distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ4

Answer:

(90.78, 98.22)

Step-by-step explanation:

A 95% confidence interval for μ is (x¯−zα/2σn‾√,x¯+zα/2σn‾√). Here, α=0.05, σ=12, and n=40. Use Excel to calculate the 95% confidence interval.1. Open Excel, enter the given data in column A, and find the sample mean, x¯, using the AVERAGE function. Thus, the sample mean is x¯=94.5.2. Click on any empty cell, enter =CONFIDENCE.NORM(0.05,12,40), and press ENTER.3. The answer rounded to two decimal places is zα/2σn‾√≈3.72. The confidence interval for the population mean has a lower limit of 94.5−3.72=90.78 and an upper limit of 94.5+3.72=98.22.Thus, the 95% confidence interval for μ is (90.78, 98.22).

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem is a little unclear with its format(random bracket) but given the following it should be A even though a parenthesis is missing but with going from left to right with parenthesis first depending on where the extra parenthesis is placed it is either A or B but it looks like there should be one grouping ((-8)+6) so it should be A

Answer:

In modular arithmetic, the modulo operation is used to find the remainder when one number is divided by another. For example, the expression "9 % 3" would evaluate to 0 because 9 divided by 3 leaves a remainder of 0.

In the given equation, taking the modulo 9 of both sides gives:

79z % 9 ≡ 92x + 9y % 9

The modulo operation distributes over addition, so we can simplify this to:

(79z % 9) ≡ (92x % 9) + (9y % 9)

Since any number divided by 9 has a remainder of itself, we can simplify this further to:

(z % 9) ≡ (2x % 9) + (y % 9)

This gives us the result:

-2z % 9 ≡ 2x % 9

Multiplying both sides by 5 gives:

(-2z % 9) * 5 ≡ (2x % 9) * 5

Which simplifies to:

-z % 9 ≡ x % 9

Since x is between 0 and 10, we know that x % 9 is between 0 and 9. Therefore, we can conclude that z = 9 - x.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we compute the exponent (3² = 9).

Next, we compute the multiplication and division (from left to right), so we have (40 - 2 × 9) = (40 - 18) = 22.

Thus, the number sentence 40 -2 × 3² = 22 is true.

B is true .22 is the real answer

Answer:

a= 108 degrees

b=88 degrees

c= 90 degrees

d= 90 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

For a degrees since 72 degrees and a degrees make a straight angle:

180-72= a

So, a=108 degrees

Same goes for b degrees:

180-92=b

So, b=88 degrees

For c degrees, you need to know that the sum of the angles in a quadrilateral equal to 360 degrees.

So, 74+a+b+c=360

= 360- (74+108+88)=c

= 90 degrees= c

So since d degrees and c degrees make a straight angle,

180-90=d

90 degrees= d

The perimeter of the shape is 12.82 units

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

A = (0, 2.76)

B = (3.65, 2.76)

C = (3.65, 0)

D = (0, 0)

Because the point D is at the origin, and the shape is a rectangle.

The perimeter of the shape can be represented as

P = 2 * (Bx + By)

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

P = 2* (3.65 + 2.76)

Evaluate

P = 12.82

Hence, the perimeter is 12.82 units

Read more about perimeter at

https://brainly.com/question/24571594

#SPJ1

Answer:

D is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Using bags that will make the balloon and the stickers have the same number in each bag, mere looking at the answers, 100/2 gives you 50 while 68/2 gives you 34. it means that it was splitted equally into the two bags.

The formulae that specify how much 8% solution and how much 24% solution were utilized are [tex]x+ y=200 and x+3y=450.[/tex]

A mathematical equation is a formula that uses the equals symbol (=) to link two expressions and represent their equivalence. A mathematical statement that demonstrates the equality of two mathematical expressions is an equation in algebra, in its most basic form. Consider the equation 3x + 5 = 14, where 3x + 5 and 14 are two expressions that are separated by the symbol "equal."

Let x and y be the volume of the 8% and 24% solutions, respectively, that were utilized.

The entire solution volume, as stated in the question, will be 200ml. The resulting equation is: [tex]x +y=200[/tex]

Now that it has been stated that 8%, 18%, and 24% saline mixes would be employed as the solution, the following equation will be:

[tex]0.08x+ 0.24y=0.18*200\\8x/100+24/100=18/100*200\\8x+24y=3600\\\\8(x+3y)=3600\\ x+3y=450\\[/tex]

To know more about equation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ4

Answer:

6(12), multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it takes 12 minutes to mow one lawn, multiplying would give you the answer of how long 6 lawns would take, which is 72

Answer:

When a block with mass M moving at a velocity of V collides and sticks to a block of mass 2M initially at rest, their velocity after the collision is equal to the original velocity of the first block. This is because, in a collision where the two objects stick together, the final velocity of the combined system is equal to the initial velocity of the first object.

To calculate the final velocity of the combined system, we can use the formula vf = vi + (2mv)/(m1+m2), where vf is the final velocity, vi is the initial velocity, m is the mass of the first object, v is the velocity of the first object, and m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects. Plugging in the values from the problem, we get:

vf = V + (2 * M * V)/(M + 2M) = V + (2 * M * V)/(3M) = V + (2/3) * V = (5/3) * V

Therefore, the final velocity of the combined system is (5/3) * V, which is equal to the original velocity of the first block.

The velocity of the mass 2M after the collision will be V/2 which is half of the velocity of mass M.

An elastic collision is one during which the system does not experience a huge reduction of kinetic energy as a result of the collision. In elastic collisions, mass and kinetic energy are both preserved. Imagine two trolleys that resemble one another moving in the same direction at the same pace.

A block with mass M moving at a velocity of V collides and sticks to a block of mass 2M initially at rest.

Let 'v' be the velocity after the collision. Then the velocity of the mass 2M after the collision will be calculated as,

MV = 2Mv

v = V / 2

Thus, the velocity of the mass 2M after the collision will be V/2 which is half of the velocity of the mass M.

More about the elastic collision link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/2356330

#SPJ2

So, the insurance company should be concerned that they could potentially lose money.

To test whether the insurance company should be concerned about the true mean claim amount being higher than the original estimate of $1,800, we can perform a one-sample t-test.

The null hypothesis for this test is that the true mean claim amount is equal to the original estimate of $1,800, and the alternative hypothesis is that the true mean claim amount is greater than the original estimate.

The t-statistic for this test is calculated as follows:

t = (sample mean - null mean) / (standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

Plugging in the values from the problem, we have:

t = ($1,950 - $1,800) / ($500 / sqrt(40)) = 2.5.

We can then use a t-table or a computer to find the critical value of t for a one-tailed t-test with 39 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.05. The critical value is 1.68.

Since the calculated t-value of 2.5 is greater than the critical value, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the true mean claim amount is significantly greater than the original estimate of $1,800.

Therefore, the insurance company should be concerned that they could potentially lose money.

To learn more about Hypothesis Testing,

visit; brainly.com/question/17099835

#SPJ4

To test whether the insurance company should be concerned about the true mean claim amount being higher than the original estimate of $1,800, we can perform a one-sample t-test.

t = (sample mean - null mean) / (standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

Plugging in the values from the problem, we have:

t = ($1,950 - $1,800) / ($500 / sqrt(40)) = 2.5.

We can then use a t-table or a computer to find the critical value of t for a one-tailed t-test with 39 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.05. The critical value is 1.68.

Therefore, the insurance company should be concerned that they could potentially lose money.

Answer:

The cost of producing 200 units can be calculated by plugging in 200 for q in the equation E = 1.43q + 43,123. This gives us E = 1.43*200 + 43,123 = 286 + 43,123 = $43,409.

In this case, with four treatment groups and n = 12 participants in each group, dfwithin treatments would be equal to 3, because there are 4 - 1 = 3 treatment groups.

In a one-factor ANOVA, dfwithin treatments refers to the degrees of freedom within the treatment groups, which is a measure of the amount of variability that is present within each group.

The degrees of freedom within the treatment groups is used to calculate the mean square within treatments (MSwithin), which is a measure of the variability within each group. MSwithin is calculated by dividing the sum of the squared differences between each participant's score and the group mean by dfwithin. This value is then used to determine the statistical significance of the treatment effects, by comparing it to the mean square between treatments (MSbetween), which is a measure of the variability between the treatment groups.

In a one-factor ANOVA, the total degrees of freedom is equal to the number of participants in all of the groups combined (4 groups * 12 participants per group = 48) minus the number of groups (48 - 4 = 44). The degrees of freedom between treatments is equal to the number of groups minus 1 (4 - 1 = 3), and the degrees of freedom within treatments is equal to the total degrees of freedom minus the degrees of freedom between treatments (44 - 3 = 41).

Learn more about One-factor ANOVA here:

https://brainly.com/question/23638404

#SPJ4

Answer: 4/3 of a mile

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the distance that Pepe and Paula ran in 60 minutes, we need to first determine their individual pace in miles per minute. Pepe ran 2/3 of a mile in 5 minutes, so his pace was 2/3 / 5 = 2/15 of a mile per minute. Paula ran 1/4 of a mile in 2 minutes, so her pace was 1/4 / 2 = 1/8 of a mile per minute.

We can now use these values to determine the distance that each of them ran in 60 minutes. Pepe ran at a pace of 2/15 of a mile per minute, so he ran 2/15 * 60 = 8/15 of a mile in 60 minutes. Paula ran at a pace of 1/8 of a mile per minute, so she ran 1/8 * 60 = 3/8 of a mile in 60 minutes.

To find the total distance that Pepe and Paula ran in 60 minutes, we can add their individual distances: 8/15 + 3/8 = 35/60 + 45/60 = 80/60 = 4/3 of a mile. Therefore, Pepe and Paula cumulatively ran a total of 4/3 of a mile on their 60-minute training run.

Step-by-step explanation:

the ancient Greeks used the system know as the attic numerals

The direct relationship of the variables is y = (t^2 - 6t)/(t - 5) * x

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

x = t - 5 and y = t^2 - 6t

The direct relationship between x and y is calculated using

Y = (y/x) * X

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

y = (t^2 - 6t)/(t - 5) * x

Hence, the direct relationship is y = (t^2 - 6t)/(t - 5) * x

Read more about direct relationship at

https://brainly.com/question/6499629

#SPJ1

Option of the matrices a, b, and d are non symmetric.

Symmetric matrices are those matrices that have equal dimensions, i.e. the number of rows is same as the number of columns. They are also known as square matrices.

It is provided that A and B are symmetric n × n matrices.

To multiply two matrices of different order, the number of rows of the first matrix must be same as the number of columns of the second matrix.

Suppose X is a 2 × 3 matrix and Y is a 3 × 2.

Then the product AB will be a n × n matrix.

(a) A= C+CT

Thus the sum of matrix A and B will be a n × n matrix.

Thus, the matrix A is non symmetric.

(b) B = C-CT

So, matrix D will also be a n × n matrix.

Thus, the matrix D is non symmetric.

(c) D = CTC = (CT) × C

Then the product CT will be a n × n matrix.

The next step would be to multiply CT and C.

Both are n × n matrices.

Thus, the matrix D is symmetric.

(d) E = CTC - CCT

Then he product CT will be a n × n matrix.

Similarly, the product CT will be a n × n matrix.

Thus, the matrix E is non symmetric.

Similalry,

(e) F = (I +C)(I + CT

Thus, the matrix F is symmetric.

(f) G = (I +C)(I -CT)

Thus, the matrix G is symmetric.

Learn more about the matrix here;

https://brainly.com/question/17367786

#SPJ1

Answer:  its 18 im pretty sure

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

"the circumference divided by the diameter"

Step-by-step explanation:

Circles are all similar, and "the circumference divided by the diameter" produces the same value regardless of their radius. This value is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter and is called π (Pi).

The cups of diced tomatoes the Alfonso should put in the chili is 6 1/2 cups.

A fraction is simply a piece of a whole. The number is represented mathematically as a quotient where the numerator and denominator are split. In a simple fraction, the numerator as well as the denominator are both integers.

Let the number of cups be x.

Based on the information, this will be illustrated as:

1.5 / x = 3/13

Cross multiply

3x = 13 × 1.5

3x = 19.5

Divide

x = 19.5 / 3

x = 6 1/2

The cups needed is 6 1/2 cups.

Learn more about fractions on:

brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ1

Answer:

309 chemistry textbooks and 103 math textbooks.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let c be the number of chemistry textbooks sold and m be the number of math textbooks sold. We know that c + m = 412, because the total number of textbooks sold is 412. We also know that c = 3m, because the number of chemistry textbooks sold is three times the number of math textbooks sold.

We can substitute 3m for c in the first equation to get 3m + m = 412. This simplifies to 4m = 412. Dividing both sides by 4 gives us m = 103.

Since we know that c = 3m, the number of chemistry textbooks sold is 3 * 103 = 309. Therefore, the store sold 309 chemistry textbooks and 103 math textbooks.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us solve the equation for X-

-1+log 6 (2x+3)-log 6 (2x)=0

adding +1 to both sides-

-1+1+log 6(2x+3)-log 6 (2x)=0+1

log 6(2x+3)-log 6 (2x)=1 . . . (1)

using logarithmic rule,

log a - log b= log(a/b)

equation (1) becomes,

log [6(2x+3)/6(2x)]=1 . . .(2)

equation (2) becomes,

log[(2x+3)/2x]=1....(3)

Again using the logarithmic rule,

log a = b

is equivalent to 10∧b = a

hence equation 3 becomes,

10∧1= (2x+3)/2x

i.e. 10 = (2x+3)/2x. . .(4)

multiplying both sides by 2x, considering x is not 0.

equation( 4) becomes

20x = 2x+3. . .(5)

subtracting 2x from both sides

equation (5) becomes,

18x=3

dividing both sides by 3,

we get,

x=6

Hence value of x is 6.

read more about the logarithmic rule:-

https://brainly.com/question/29200864?referrer=searchResults

Fifth power of the given transition matrix is (0.22 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.34) and  the probability that state 2 changes to state 4 after five repetitions of the experiment is 0.14.

To find the fifth power of the matrix A, we can simply multiply A by itself five times:

A^5 = A * A * A * A * A

= (0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2) * (0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4) * (0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2) * (0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4) * (0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2)

= (0.22 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.34)

To find the probability that state 2 changes to state 4 after five repetitions of the experiment, we need to look at the element in the fifth power matrix A^5 that corresponds to state 2 and state 4. This element is located in the second row and fourth column of the matrix, which is 0.14.

Therefore, Fifth power of the given transition matrix is (0.22 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.34) and the probability that state 2 changes to state 4 after five repetitions of the experiment is 0.14.

To learn more about Power of Matrix,

visit; brainly.com/question/17113081

#SPJ4

A^5 = A * A * A * A * A

= (0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2) * (0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4) * (0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2) * (0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4) * (0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2)

= (0.22 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.34)

Therefore, Fifth power of the given transition matrix is (0.22 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.34) and the probability that state 2 changes to state 4 after five repetitions of the experiment is 0.14.

The value of y of the inequality 4y + 1/5 ≤ 4/5 is: y ≤ 3/20.

Inequalities can be solved the way a normal algebraic equation is being solved. It is solved by isolating the value of the variable.

The inequality given is, 4y + 1/5 ≤ 4/5. Solve as shown below:

Subtract both sides by 1/5:

4y + 1/5 - 1/5 ≤ 4/5 - 1/5 [subtraction property of equality]

4y ≤ 3/5

Divide both sides by 4:

4y/4 ≤ 3/5 / 4

y ≤ 3/5 × 1/4

y ≤ 3/5 × 1/4

y ≤ (3 × 1) / (5 × 4)

y ≤ 3/20

The value of y is: y ≤ 3/20.

Learn more about inequalities on:

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1

Answer:

Below in bold.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the height be h in.

Area of a triangle = 1/2 * base * height

= 1/2 * (h + 6) * h = 600

Multiply both sides by 2:

h(h + 6) = 1200

h^2 + 6h = 1200

(h + 3)^2 - 9 = 1200

(h + 3)^2 = 1209

h + 3 = +/- sqrt(1209

h = -3 +/-sqrt(1209)

  = 31.77 in  (we ignore the negative root).

So, the height is 31.77 in and the base is 37.77 in

Option C is correct,4.5 is greater than 3.8, so this solution does work.

If x represents the number of hours and y represents the number of liters of water, then we can plug the possible solutions into our inequality to see which solution(s) work.

Inequality

In mathematics, an inequality is a relation that makes a non-equal comparison between two numbers or other mathematical expressions. It is used most often to compare two numbers on the number line by their size.  

The first option is having 0.5 liters of water for 4.5 hours of hiking. So will plug 3 in for y and 4.5 in for x:

y > 0.5x + 1.8

3 > 0.5(4.5) + 1.8

3 > 4.05  

But 3 is not greater than 4.05, this solution does not work.

The next option is having 2 liters of water for 2.5 hrs of hiking:

2 > 0.5(2.5) + 1.8  

2 > 3.05

But 2 is not greater than 3.05, so this solution does not work.

Option c is having 4.5 liters of water for 4 hours of hiking:

4.5 > 0.5(4) + 1.8

4.5 > 3.8

So 4.5 is greater than 3.8, this solution does  work.

The last option is having 2.5 liters of water for 3 hours of hiking:

2.5 > 0.5(3) + 1.8

2.5 > 3.3

2.5 is not greater than 3.3, so this solution does not works

Option c is correct,4.5 is greater than 3.8 so this solution does work.

To learn more about Inequality visit:

brainly.com/question/27989101

#SPJ4

y > 0.5x + 1.8

3 > 0.5(4.5) + 1.8

3 > 4.05  

But 3 is not greater than 4.05, this solution does not work.

2 > 0.5(2.5) + 1.8  

2 > 3.05

But 2 is not greater than 3.05, so this solution does not work.

4.5 > 0.5(4) + 1.8

4.5 > 3.8

2.5 > 0.5(3) + 1.8

2.5 > 3.3

2.5 is not greater than 3.3, so this solution does not works

Option c is correct,4.5 is greater than 3.8 so this solution does work.

An invalid speculation is a sort of measurable theory that suggests that no factual importance exists in a bunch of offered viewpoints.

Speculation testing is utilized to evaluate the validity of a speculation by utilizing test information. It is represented as H0, and it is sometimes referred to as the "null."

Give the null hypotheses a name.

Negative hypothesis:

H. There is no correlation between gender and election participation.

Other possibilities:

H: Gender and participation in the most recent election are linked.

Rule of rejection:

To learn more about null hypotheses here

https://brainly.com/question/28331914

#SPJ4

Answer:

x  =  -7 + √(73)

y  =  -7 - √(73)

Step-by-step explanation:

Product p = x × y = -24

Somme s = x + y = -14

Then

x and y are solutions to the equation:

z² - sz + p = 0

Then

x and y are solutions to the equation:

z² + 14z - 24 = 0

Using the quadratic formula:

x  =  ( -14 + √[(14² - 4×(1)×(-24)] ) / ( 2×(1) )  =  -7 + √(73)

and

y  =  ( -14 - √[(14² - 4×(1)×(-24)] ) / ( 2×(1) )  =  -7 - √(73)