The effect on the accounting equation Option D. Assets, no effect; liabilities, $600 decrease; equity, $400 increase.
Liabilities: Accounts payable is a liability account that represents the company's obligations to pay its suppliers. When Cedar Park Company pays $600 of its accounts payable, it reduces the amount owed to suppliers. Therefore, liabilities decrease by $600.
Equity: In this case, when Cedar Park Company pays its accounts payable, it demonstrates a reduction in liabilities, which contributes to an increase in equity. The company's owners' claim on the assets increases by the amount of the reduction in liabilities. In this case, since the liabilities decreased by $600, equity increased by the same amount.
Assets: Cash, which is an asset, is used to make the payment. However, the payment of accounts payable does not affect the total amount of assets owned by the company. The cash is simply used to settle the liability, resulting in no net change in assets.
Therefore, the effect on the accounting equation is Assets, no effect; liabilities, $600 decrease; equity, $400 increase. This means that the total assets, liabilities, and equity remain balanced before and after the payment, ensuring the accounting equation (Assets = Liabilities + Equity) is still in equilibrium. Therefore, the correct option is D.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
Today, Cedar Park Company paid $600 of its accounts payable in cash. What is the effect on the accounting equation?
A. Assets, $600 increase; liabilities, no effect; equity, $600 increase.
B. Assets, $600 decrease; liabilities, $600 decrease; equity, no effect.
C. Assets, $600 decrease; liabilities, $400 increase; equity, $200 decrease
D. Assets, no effect; liabilities, $600 decrease; equity, $400 increase
E. There is no effect.
Know more about Accounting equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/27891900
#SPJ8
The free market economic system has both benefits and problems. Discuss the key market imperfections that exist and in particular highlight the imperfections that the Australian Government should have a role in addressing. Include reasons as to why the Australian Government should address these imperfections.
The free market economic system has some benefits, but it also has imperfections. To improve market efficiency, the government should have a role in addressing market imperfections, which include public goods, externalities, and market power.
The free market economic system is characterized by a lack of government interference, which promotes economic growth and resource allocation. However, the market system has several market imperfections that limit its efficiency, such as public goods, externalities, and market power. Public goods are non-excludable and non-rivalrous in consumption, which means that they are provided for free. As a result, the private sector has no incentive to produce them, and the government must intervene to provide them. National defense and law enforcement are examples of public goods. Externalities are costs or benefits imposed on third parties by economic activities.
For example, a manufacturing plant may emit pollution that harms the environment and local communities. The private sector does not account for externalities, and the government must intervene to correct them. Market power is the ability of a firm to raise prices above competitive levels. Monopolies, oligopolies, and cartels are examples of market power. The government must intervene to promote competition and prevent market power.Australian Government should address these imperfections because they reduce market efficiency and result in market failure. As a result, the government must intervene to promote the welfare of citizens and ensure economic efficiency.
Know more about economic system, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27630988
#SPJ11
Which one of the following statements is not true regarding system reliability? Redundancy increases cost of the system A parallel system successfully operates as long as one component functions In a series system, all components must function or the system will fail A system of components configured in parallel provides redundancy The reliability of a series system increases as additional components are added in series
The reliability of a series system increases as additional components are added in series.
The statement "The reliability of a series system increases as additional components are added in series" is not true.
In a series system, all components must function properly for the system to operate successfully. If any one component fails, the entire system fails. Therefore, the reliability of a series system decreases as additional components are added in series because the failure of any single component results in the failure of the entire system.
On the other hand, redundancy increases the reliability of a system. Redundancy refers to the inclusion of additional components or backup systems that can take over the functionality of failed components. A parallel system is an example of redundancy where multiple components operate independently, and the system can function as long as at least one component is operational. This provides increased reliability because the failure of one component does not cause the entire system to fail.
Adding redundancy to a system by configuring components in parallel does increase the cost of the system. Redundant components require additional resources and maintenance, which can lead to higher costs. However, the benefit of increased reliability justifies the additional cost in many cases.
The statement that the reliability of a series system increases as additional components are added in series is not true. In a series system, the reliability decreases as more components are added because the failure of any one component results in the failure of the entire system.
To know more about Redundancy, visit
https://brainly.com/question/31018440
#SPJ11
irst-price sealed bid auction There are 2 bidders, labeled i = 1, 2. Bidder i has a valuation v, for the good this means that, if bidder i gets the good and pays the price p, then i's payoff is vi- p. The two bidder's valuations are independently and uniformly distributed on [0, 1]. Bids are constrained to be nonnegative. The bidders simultaneously submit their bids. The higher bidder wins the good and pays the price she bid; the other bidder gets and pays nothing. In case of a tie, the winner is determined by a flip of a fair coin. The bidders want to maximize expected payoffs. (a) For simplicity, suppose that players are restricted to adopt strategies of the form: b; (vi) = ai + civi. In this case, we can summarize a strategy for player i by the vector (ai, ci). Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium (ai, ci) and (a2, c₂) of the game where players are restricted to these types of simple strategies. (b) Show that the strategies found in part (a) are also a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the unrestricted game.
(a)Let, P1 be the price bid by Bidder 1P1 = b1(v1) = a1 + c1v1P1 is Bidder 1’s expected payoffP1 = v1 − P1 = v1 − a1 − c1v1 = (1 − c1)v1 − a1Bidder 2’s expected payoff isP2 = v2 − P2 = v2 − b2(v2) = v2 − a2 − c2v2 = (1 − c2)v2 − a2For P1 to be optimal, we should maximize P1 under the assumption that P2 is fixed. We can take the partial derivative of P1 with respect to P1 and set it equal to 0 to get the optimal value of P1. So, let us take the partial derivative of P1 with respect to P1.∂P1/∂P1 = −1∂P1/∂v1 = 1−c1Thus, optimal P1 is given by the following: P1 = (1 − c2)v2 − a2P2 is given by the following: P2 = (1 − c1)v1 − a1We want to solve for Bayesian Nash Equilibrium, which means that players’ strategies should be optimal given the beliefs about the other players’ valuations.
For the case when P1 is optimal, we can write that: (1 − c2)v2 − a2 = v1 − P1 = v1 − (1 − c1)v1 + a1(1 − c2)v2 − a2 = cv1 + a1Now, we can use the fact that v1 and v2 are independently and uniformly distributed on [0, 1] to get the posterior beliefs:Belief 1: Given that P1 is optimal, the probability that v1 > v2 is 1/2.Belief 2: Given that P2 is optimal, the probability that v2 > v1 is 1/2.Because of these beliefs, optimal strategies for both players should provide the same payoff when they believe that their valuation is less than the other player’s valuation, and a higher payoff when they believe that their valuation is higher than the other player’s valuation.So, given the posterior belief, we can writeor c1 = (1 − c2)/c2We need to check which case satisfies the constraint that bids should be nonnegative:Since v1 and v2 are uniformly distributed on [0, 1], we can write:v2 > v1 implies that (1 − c1)v1 + a1 > (1 − c1)v1,v1 > v2 implies that (1 − c2)v2 − a2 > (1 − c2)v2We can combine these two inequalities to get:(1 − c1)v1 + a1 > (1 − c1)v1 > (1 − c2)v2 > (1 − c2)v2 − a2Therefore, a1 > 0 and a2 < 1. Since c1 = 0.5c2, and c2 > 0, we have:c1 > 0 and c2 > 0Thus, we have:c1 = 1/3, c2 = 2/3, a1 = 1/3, a2 = 0(b)We need to show that the strategies found in part (a) are also a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the unrestricted game. In the unrestricted game, players can use any strategy.
However, using a more complex strategy should not provide a player with an advantage over using a simpler strategy.In the unrestricted game, the optimal strategy for player 1 should satisfy:(1 − c2)v2 − a2 = max P1The optimal strategy for player 2 should satisfy:(1 − c1)v1 − a1 = max P2Because of the uniform distribution of valuations, if a player has a better strategy than the one found in part (a), it should be based on additional information. However, players have no private information in this game. Therefore, the strategies found in part (a) are also a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the unrestricted game.
know more about price bid,here:
https://brainly.com/question/18362214
#SPJ11
Intro A painting by Rembrandt was recently sold for $51 million. Before that, it was sold for $25 million 12 years ago, and for $6 million 35 years ago. Attempt 1/10 for 1 pts. Part 1 What was the annual rate of return from the earliest purchase to the most recent sale? 3+ decimals Submit Attempt 1/10 for 1 pts. Part 2 What was the annual rate of return from the purchase 12 years ago to the most recent sale? 3+ decimals Submit
Intro A painting by Rembrandt was recently sold for $51 million. Before that, it was sold for $25 million 12 years ago, and for $6 million 35 years ago. The annual rate of return from the earliest purchase to the most recent sale is 15.3%, and the annual rate of return from the purchase 12 years ago to the most recent sale is 8.3%.
From the earliest purchase to the recent sale, the number of years was 35 years. The initial cost was $6 million, the final cost was $51 million.
To find the annual rate of return, we use the formula to calculate the CAGR.
The formula is as follows:
CAGR =(EV/BV)^{1/n}-1 , where: EV = Ending value ; BV = Beginning value n = Number of years
The initial cost was $6 million, and the final cost was $51 million,
So: EV = $51 millionBV = $6 millionn = 35 yearsCAGR = (EV/BV)^(1/n)-1CAGR = (51/6)^(1/35)-1CAGR = 0.153 or 15.3% annual rate of return
From the purchase 12 years ago to the recent sale, the number of years was 12 years. The initial cost was $25 million, and the final cost was $51 million.
To find the annual rate of return, we use the formula to calculate the CAGR.
The formula is as follows:CAGR = (EV/BV)^(1/n)-1, where: EV = Ending value; BV = Beginning value n = Number of years
The initial cost was $25 million, and the final cost was $51 million,
So: EV = $51 millionBV = $25 millionn = 12 yearsCAGR = (EV/BV)^(1/n)-1CAGR = (51/25)^(1/12)-1CAGR = 0.083 or 8.3% annual rate of return
Hence, the annual rate of return from the earliest purchase to the most recent sale is 15.3%, and the annual rate of return from the purchase 12 years ago to the most recent sale is 8.3%.
For more such questions on rate of return, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1789817
#SPJ11
A business buyer buys goods for SEK 50,000 including VAT. (25% rate) on credit. What accounting effects does the transaction have?
The business buyer's purchase of goods on credit worth SEK 50,000 including VAT at 25% has the accounting effect of increasing both assets and liabilities.
When a business buyer buys goods on credit worth SEK 50,000 including VAT at 25%, there are accounting effects to be noted. This transaction has the effect of increasing both assets and liabilities. The assets of the buyer are increased by the value of the goods purchased, which is SEK 50,000 including VAT at 25%.This increase in assets is, however, accompanied by an increase in liabilities since the purchase is made on credit. The buyer becomes liable to pay the supplier for the goods purchased on credit. This liability is recorded as accounts payable in the buyer's books of accounts.The VAT element of the transaction also has an accounting effect. The VAT element is considered as a part of the purchase price of the goods. Therefore, the buyer's accounts will show the VAT element as part of the cost of the goods purchased on credit. This means that the buyer's costs of goods sold will increase by SEK 10,000 (VAT at 25% of SEK 50,000).
Know more about assets and liabilities., here:
https://brainly.com/question/13731427
#SPJ11
Briefly explain ONE of the parts of Henry Clay's proposed American System, a comprehensive plan to bring about economic improvement. Provide at least ONE piece of evidence to support your explanation.
¥ protective tariffs
¥ National Bank
¥ internal improvements
b) Briefly explain how ONE of the parts of Henry Clay's proposed American System would bring about economic improvement. Provide at least ONE piece of evidence to support your explanation .c) Identify and briefly explain the role played by ONE individual or group that was critical of one of the parts or the entire plan for an American System.
b) One part of Henry Clay's proposed American System was the implementation of protective tariffs. Clay believed that protective tariffs would help stimulate domestic manufacturing and protect American industries from foreign competition.
Imposing tariffs on imported goods, it would make foreign products more expensive and encourage consumers to buy domestically produced goods. One piece of evidence to support this is the Tariff of 1816, which was passed as a result of Clay's advocacy. The Tariff of 1816 was the first protective tariff in the United States, and it aimed to protect American manufacturers, particularly those in the textile industry, from competition with cheaper British imports. The tariff helped boost domestic production and encouraged the growth of American industries. c) One individual who was critical of Henry Clay's proposed American System was Andrew Jackson. Jackson, a political rival of Clay, argued against the establishment of a National Bank as part of the American System. He believed that the National Bank represented an undue concentration of power in the hands of the federal government and favored a more limited role for the central bank.
Learn more about protective tariffs here:
https://brainly.com/question/23421785
#SPJ11
The CFO of a consulting engineering firm is deciding between purchasing Ford Explorers and Toyota 4Runners for company principals. The purchase price for the Ford Explorer will be $30,750. Annual main
The incremental ROR between the two vehicles is approximately 211.38%. The firm's MARR is 18% per year, the firm should buy the vehicle with the higher incremental ROR. In this case, since the incremental ROR is greater than the MARR, the firm should choose the Ford Explorer.
To calculate the incremental ROR (Rate of Return) between the two vehicles, we need to compare the net revenues generated by each vehicle. The incremental ROR formula is:
Incremental ROR = (Incremental Net Revenue / Incremental Investment) * 100
First, let's calculate the incremental net revenue:
Incremental Net Revenue = Net Revenue from Ford Explorer - Net Revenue from Toyota 4Runner
To calculate the net revenue for each vehicle, we need to consider the purchase price, annual maintenance costs, and salvage value after 3 years.
Net Revenue from Ford Explorer = Purchase Price - Annual Maintenance Costs + Salvage Value
= $30,500 - ($675 + $0) + ($30,500 * 0.5)
= $30,500 - $675 + $15,250
= $45,075
Net Revenue from Toyota 4Runner = Purchase Price - Annual Maintenance Costs + Salvage Value
= $37,750 - $0 + ($37,750 * 0.6)
= $37,750 + $22,650
= $60,400
Now, let's calculate the incremental net revenue:
Incremental Net Revenue = $45,075 - $60,400
= -$15,325
Next, let's calculate the incremental investment:
Incremental Investment = Purchase Price of Ford Explorer - Purchase Price of Toyota 4Runner
= $30,500 - $37,750
= -$7,250
Finally, we can calculate the incremental ROR:
Incremental ROR = (Incremental Net Revenue / Incremental Investment) * 100
= (-$15,325 / -$7,250) * 100
= 211.38%
The incremental ROR between the two vehicles is approximately 211.38%.
The firm's MARR is 18% per year, the firm should buy the vehicle with the higher incremental ROR. In this case, since the incremental ROR is greater than the MARR, the firm should choose the Ford Explorer.
To know more about incremental ROR (Rate of Return), refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/17120604#
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
The CFO of a consulting engineering firm is deciding between purchasing Ford Explorers and Toyota 4Runners for company principals. The purchase price for the Ford Explorer will be $30,500. Annual maintenance costs for the Explorer are expected to be $675 per year more than that of the 4Runner. The purchase price for Toyota 4Runners is 37,750 The trade-in values after 3 years are estimated to be 50% of the first cost for the Explorer and 60% for the 4Runner. (a) what is the incremental ROR between the two vehicles? (b) Provided the firm's MARR is 18% per year, which vehicle should it buy? a) The incremental ROR between the two vehicles is 1%. b) The firm should buy (Click to select)as the incremental ROR is (Click to select) the MARR
TRIPLE CAMERA SYMPHONY Z50 Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University Department of Economics 3rd Year 1" Semester B.S.S (Hon's) Final Examination 2018 Course Title. Introductory Econometrics
Symphony Z50 has a triple camera setup on the rear side of the phone. It is an advanced smartphone that has been popular in the mobile market since its release. This triple camera includes a 16-megapixel main sensor, a 5-megapixel ultra-wide-angle lens, and a 2-megapixel depth sensor.
Symphony Z50 is a high-end smartphone that has a powerful triple camera that is built to provide its users with the best photography experience. The primary camera has a 16-megapixel sensor that captures clear and crisp images with enhanced details and clarity. This sensor is capable of capturing high-quality images even in low light conditions.The secondary camera has a 5-megapixel ultra-wide-angle lens that allows you to capture a larger area in a single shot.
It is perfect for taking group photos, landscapes, and cityscapes. The third camera has a 2-megapixel depth sensor that adds a bokeh effect to your photos. It allows you to blur the background and focus on the subject to create professional-looking images.In conclusion, the Symphony Z50's triple camera is an excellent feature for photography enthusiasts. It provides high-quality images, wide-angle shots, and bokeh effects, making it a versatile camera for various types of photography.
To know more about market visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32106392
#SPJ11
Bartling Energy Systems recently reported $9,250 of sales,
$5,750 of operating costs other than depreciation, and $1,000 of
depreciation. The company had no amortization charges, it had
$3,200 of outs
Bartling Energy Systems recently reported $9,250 of sales, $5,750 of operating costs other than depreciation, and $1,000 of depreciation. The company had no amortization charges, it had $3,200 of outstanding bonds that carry a 7.5% interest rate, and its federal-plus-state income tax rate was 40%. What is the firm’s net income?Net IncomeBartling Energy Systems recently reported $9,250 of sales, $5,750 of operating costs other than depreciation, and $1,000 of depreciation. The company had no amortization charges, it had $3,200 of outstanding bonds that carry a 7.5% interest rate, and its federal-plus-state income tax rate was 40%.To calculate the net income of Bartling Energy Systems, we will use the following formula;Net Income = Sales - Operating costs other than depreciation - Depreciation - Interest expense - TaxesUsing the given values in the formula,Net Income = $9,250 - $5,750 - $1,000 - $3,200(7.5%) - ($9,250 - $5,750 - $1,000 - $3,200(7.5%))0.4Net Income = $950.75Therefore, the firm’s net income is $950.75.
Learn more about amortization here: brainly.com/question/15170334
#SPJ11
Suppose that money income decreases by 20% while the prices of goods X and Y increase by 10%. These changes will Multiple Choice O will consumer to be worse off than before as he can only afford a consumption bundle on a lower indifference curve. O consumer to be better off than before as he can afford a consumption bundle on a higher indifference curve. O cannot say for sure. O leave the consumer's consumption bundle unchanged.
The consumer will be worse off than before as he can only afford a consumption bundle on a lower indifference curve.
When money income decreases by 20%, the consumer's purchasing power decreases. This means the consumer has less money available to spend on goods and services. At the same time, if the prices of goods X and Y increase by 10%, it implies that the consumer needs to spend more money to purchase the same quantity of goods.
As a result, the consumer will face a double impact: reduced income and increased prices. With less money and higher prices, the consumer's ability to afford the same consumption bundle as before decreases.
The decrease in income and increase in prices affect the consumer's budget constraint, shifting it inward. This means that the consumer's new budget line will be steeper, indicating that he can afford fewer goods and services.
Since the consumer's budget constraint has shifted inward, the consumer's optimal consumption bundle will also change. The consumer will have to choose a consumption bundle that lies on a lower indifference curve, indicating a lower level of satisfaction or utility compared to the previous situation.
Therefore, the correct answer is that the consumer will be worse off than before as he can only afford a consumption bundle on a lower indifference curve. The decrease in income and increase in prices reduce the consumer's purchasing power and limit his ability to maintain the same level of consumption as before.
To know more about consumer , visit
https://brainly.com/question/29649674
#SPJ11
Delta = .5 Gamma = .1 The stock price moves 10. What is the
change in the option portfolio?
The change in the option portfolio is 10.Option portfolios refer to a portfolio that comprises of options contracts on multiple assets.
When analyzing option portfolios, we need to consider several variables, such as the Delta and Gamma values. Delta refers to the amount an option’s value changes with a $1 change in the underlying asset price, while Gamma refers to the amount that an option delta changes with a $1 move in the underlying asset price.According to the question, Delta = .5 and Gamma = .1.
Also, the stock price moves 10. To find the change in the option portfolio, we can use the following formula:Option Portfolio Change = Delta x Stock Price Move + 0.5 x Gamma x (Stock Price Move)²Now, substituting the given values, we have:
Option Portfolio Change = 0.5 x 10 + 0.5 x 0.1 x 10²Option Portfolio Change = 5 + 5 Option Portfolio Change = 10
Therefore, the change in the option portfolio is 10.
For more question on portfolio
https://brainly.com/question/29518759
#SPJ11
On April 1, the price of gas at Bob’s Corner Station was $4.50 per gallon. On May 1, the price was $5.25 per gallon. On June 1, it was back down to $4.50 per gallon.
Between April 1 and May 1, Bob’s price increased by , or .
Between May 1 and June 1, Bob’s price decreased by , or .
Suppose that at a gas station across the street, prices are always 20% higher than Bob’s. In absolute dollar terms, the difference between Bob’s prices and the prices across the street is when gas costs $5.25 than when gas costs $4.50.
Some economists blame high commodity prices (including the price of gas) on interest rates being too low.
Suppose the Fed raises the target for the federal funds rate from 2% to 2.75%. This change of percentage points means that the Fed raised its target by approximately .
The change in the target for the federal funds rate from 2% to 2.75% is an increase of 0.75 percentage points. Between April 1 and May 1, Bob's price increased by $0.75 per gallon, or 16.7% [(5.25 - 4.50)/4.50 * 100].
Between May 1 and June 1, Bob's price decreased by $0.75 per gallon, or 14.3% [(4.50 - 5.25)/5.25 * 100]. The absolute dollar difference between Bob's prices and the prices across the street is $0.90 per gallon [(5.25 - 4.50) * 1.20] when gas costs $5.25 and $0.00 per gallon [(4.50 - 4.50) * 1.20] when gas costs $4.50. The change in the target for the federal funds rate from 2% to 2.75% is an increase of 0.75 percentage points.
To know more about Federal funds visit-
brainly.com/question/31232170
#SPJ11
Consider the following statements: (i) Ordinary shares are those shares in a company that confer the shareholders the voting rights and entitlement of residual benefits of the company (ii) Residual value is the expected amount for which a non-current asset is able to sell at the end of its estimated useful life. (iii) Prepayments are expenses spent but not yet paid as at the reporting date Select one: a. (i) False; (ii) False; and (iii) True b. (i) True; (ii) True; and (iii) true c. (i) True: (ii) True; and (iii) False d. (i) False: (ii) True; and (iii) True
The correct option is d. (i) False: (ii) True; and (iii) True. The reasoning is explained below:(i) Ordinary shares are those shares in a company that confer the shareholders the voting rights and entitlement of residual benefits of the company.
This statement is incorrect because it mentions only the voting rights and entitlements, but not the preferential rights such as right to dividends and return of capital during liquidation. Hence, ordinary shares confer residual benefits along with other benefits as well.(ii) Residual value is the expected amount for which a non-current asset is able to sell at the end of its estimated useful life.
This statement is true as residual value is the estimated amount for which a non-current asset can be sold at the end of its useful life.(iii) Prepayments are expenses spent but not yet paid as at the reporting date. This statement is also true as prepayments are expenses paid in advance, but not yet paid as at the reporting date.Therefore, the option d. (i) False: (ii) True; and (iii) True is the correct answer.
To know more about Ordinary shares visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32771218
#SPJ11
which 2 statements are true regarding using bank rules in quickbooks online?
1. Bank rules in QuickBooks Online are used to automatically categorize transactions based on predefined criteria. This can save time and effort in manually categorizing transactions.
2. Bank rules can be created and customized to match specific criteria, such as transaction amounts, descriptions, or payees. This allows for more accurate and consistent categorization of transactions.
3. Bank rules can be set up to apply to all future transactions or to specific transactions within a date range. This flexibility allows for better control over how transactions are categorized.
4. Bank rules in QuickBooks Online can be used to assign specific accounts or classes to transactions, ensuring proper allocation and tracking of financial data.
5. Bank rules can be edited or deleted at any time, allowing for adjustments and refinements as needed.
Based on the options provided, statements 1 and 2 are true regarding using bank rules in QuickBooks Online.
Learn more about QuickBooks click here
brainly.com/question/27983902
#SPJ11
In the context of the Keynesian model, which of the following statements is incorrect?
Group of answer choices:
An increase in the marginal propensity to consume results in a steeper planned aggregate expenditure line
An exogenous payment from the government to households results in an unplanned increase in inventories
An exogenous collection of taxes from the government results in an unplanned increase in inventories
None of the other options
The incorrect statement in the context of the Keynesian model is "An exogenous collection of taxes from the government results in an unplanned increase in inventories."
In the Keynesian model, the level of output and income in an economy is determined by the aggregate demand and aggregate supply. The aggregate demand is composed of consumption (C), investment (I), government spending (G), and net exports (NX).
An increase in the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which represents the proportion of additional income that households spend, does result in a steeper planned aggregate expenditure line. When the MPC increases, a greater proportion of income is consumed, leading to a higher level of planned aggregate expenditure for a given level of income.
An exogenous payment from the government to households, such as a transfer payment or subsidy, results in an unplanned increase in inventories. When households receive additional income from the government, they tend to spend a portion of it on goods and services. This leads to an increase in aggregate demand and, in the short run, firms may not have enough time to adjust their production levels, resulting in unplanned inventory accumulation.
However, an exogenous collection of taxes from the government does not result in an unplanned increase in inventories. When taxes are collected, households have less disposable income available for consumption. This reduces aggregate demand, and firms adjust their production levels accordingly to match the reduced demand, avoiding unplanned inventory accumulation.
Therefore, the statement "An exogenous collection of taxes from the government results in an unplanned increase in inventories" is incorrect in the context of the Keynesian model.
To learn more about Keynesian model refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32242068
#SPJ11
what was the smoot-hawley tariff act? aan act that placed high taxes on products imported in the usa. bit was a tariff to protect american rights cnone of the above dsmoot and hawley wanted to help americans have money to buy during the great depression
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was an act that placed high taxes on products imported in the USA, but it ended up hurting the US economy by causing other countries to impose their own tariffs on American goods, which led to a decrease in international trade and worsened the effects of the Great Depression.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was a US law passed in 1930 that set high tariffs on imported products to protect American businesses from foreign competition. The act was named after two lawmakers, Reed Smoot and Willis C. Hawley, who helped author it. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was meant to protect American businesses from foreign competition by raising the price of imported goods.
However, the act ended up hurting the US economy by causing other countries to impose their own tariffs on American goods. This led to a decrease in international trade and worsened the effects of the Great Depression.The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act raised tariffs on more than 20,000 imported goods.
The tariffs ranged from 40% to 100% on products such as agricultural goods, textiles, and steel. The act was opposed by many economists and business leaders who argued that it would lead to a decrease in international trade and hurt the US economy.
For more such questions on economy
https://brainly.com/question/28210218
#SPJ11
CELL, Incorporated's 2021 income statement lists the following income and expenses: EBIT = $510,000, Interest expense = $51,000, and Net income = $300,000. What are the 2021 Taxes reported on the income statement? O $133,000 $155,000 $159,000 O $ 143,000
The 2021 Taxes reported on the income statement, given the EBIT and the net income is c. $159,000
How to find the taxes ?To determine the taxes reported on the income statement for CELL, Incorporated in 2021, the following formula can be used:
Taxes = EBIT - Interest Expense - Net Income
Given the values provided:
EBIT = $ 510, 000
Interest expense = $ 51, 000
Net income = $300 , 000
The taxes are therefore :
= 510, 000 - 51, 000 - 300, 000
= 510, 000 - 351, 000
= $ 159, 000
Find out more on EBIT at https://brainly.com/question/14565042
#SPJ4
Suppose your firm is considering two mutually exclusive, required projects with the cash flows shown below. The required rate of return on projects of both of their risk class is 10 percent, and that
To make a decision, we need to calculate the net present value (NPV) of each project. Given a required rate of return of 10 percent, the NPV for project A is $1,000 / (1 + 0.10) - $500 = $454.55, and for project B it is $1,200 / (1 + 0.10) - $800 = $272.73.
Therefore, project A has a higher NPV and would be the preferred choice.
To determine the best project, we calculate the NPV of each project. NPV is the sum of the present values of the cash flows, which is calculated by discounting each cash flow by the required rate of return and subtracting the initial investment. For project A, the initial investment
is $500 and the cash flow after one year is $1,000. For project B, the initial investment is $800 and the cash flow after one year is $1,200. Comparing the NPVs, project A has a higher NPV of $454.55 compared to Project B's NPV of $272.73, indicating that Project A is the more favorable option.
For more questions like Project click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30407333
#SPJ11
Beginning from a position of equilibrium, use supply and demand eurves to show how new technologies that reduce the cost of producing gas from unconventional deposits affect the market. Does the supply curve shift? The demand curve? Both? Explain.
New technology is a game changer in the natural gas industry. With new ways of extracting gas from shale, the United States is becoming one of the world's largest producers of this fuel.
The increase in supply and decrease in price of natural gas are two of the most significant impacts of these changes. Here we explain how the shift in supply and demand curves works.Supply curves shift to the right when new technologies that reduce the cost of producing gas from unconventional deposits enter the market. The amount of gas that producers are willing to supply at every price level has increased due to the lower production costs.
For example, let's say that the cost of producing natural gas from shale was $4 per unit. Now, with new technology, the cost has decreased to $2 per unit. Producers are now willing to supply more gas at a lower price.Instead, a decrease in the price of natural gas causes the demand curve to shift to the right. Overall, both supply and demand curves are affected by new technologies that reduce the cost of producing gas from unconventional deposits. However, the supply curve is the one that shifts to the right while the demand curve remains stable.
To kow more bout natural visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30406208
#SPJ11
Come up with a set of guidelines or recommendations in SWM that
would be necessary for China or USG program to implement along with
the international monetary and technical assistance and
aid.
Guidelines and recommendations for solid waste management (SWM) that would be necessary for China or the USG (United States Government) program to implement, along with international monetary and technical assistance and aid, include: Policy and Regulatory Framework.
Policy and Regulatory Framework: Establish comprehensive policies and regulations that promote sustainable SWM practices, including waste reduction, recycling, and proper disposal. These policies should align with international best practices and standards.Capacity Building and Training: Provide technical training and capacity-building programs to enhance the knowledge and skills of SWM professionals, including waste management officials, engineers, and workers. This should focus on modern waste management techniques, technologies, and practices.Infrastructure Development: Invest in the development and improvement of SWM infrastructure, including waste collection systems, treatment facilities, recycling centers, and landfill management. This includes prioritizing the construction of environmentally friendly and efficient facilities.Public Awareness and Education: Launch public awareness campaigns to educate and engage citizens in waste reduction, recycling, and proper waste disposal practices. This can include community outreach programs, educational initiatives in schools, and media campaigns to promote behavioral change.Integrated Waste Management Approach: Implement an integrated waste management approach that includes waste reduction, recycling, composting, and waste-to-energy solutions. This approach ensures the maximum utilization of resources and minimizes the environmental impact of waste.Encouraging Innovation and Research: Support research and development initiatives in SWM, focusing on innovative technologies, waste treatment methods, and recycling techniques. Foster collaborations between academia, industry, and government agencies to drive innovation in the sector.Financial Support and Incentives: Provide financial support, grants, and incentives to encourage private sector participation in SWM initiatives, such as waste management companies, recycling industries, and technology providers. This can include tax incentives, subsidies, and low-interest loans.Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish a robust monitoring and evaluation system to track the progress and effectiveness of SWM programs and projects. This will enable timely adjustments and improvements based on data-driven insights.International Cooperation and Collaboration: Foster collaboration with international organizations, donor agencies, and partner countries to share experiences, knowledge, and best practices in SWM. This can include technical assistance, knowledge exchange, and joint research projects.Sustainable Funding Mechanisms: Develop sustainable funding mechanisms for SWM, including exploring public-private partnerships, user fees, and innovative financing models. This will ensure the long-term financial viability of SWM programs beyond the initial aid and assistance phase.It is important to note that these guidelines and recommendations can be adapted and customized based on the specific needs, priorities, and circumstances of China or the USG program. Local stakeholders, including government authorities, community representatives, and experts, should be actively involved in the planning, implementation, and monitoring of SWM initiatives.
To know more about international monetary follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30627656
#SPJ4
For Blossom Company, variable costs are 70% of sales, and fixed costs are $156,000. Management's net income goal is $60,000 Compute the required sales in dollars needed to achieve management's target net income of $60,000. (Use the contribution margin approach.) Required sales $____
The contribution margin approach is used to determine the sales required to meet the management's net income objective of $60,000. We are given the following Blossom Company's variable costs are 70% of sales.The fixed costs are $156,000.Using the contribution margin approach
we can calculate the required sales as follows Contribution margin = Sales - Variable costsContribution margin ratio = Contribution margin / Sales Let x be the total sales. The contribution margin can be computed by multiplying the sales by the contribution margin ratio. Contribution margin ratio = (Sales - Variable costs) / Sales0.30 = (x - 0.70x) / xContribution margin = 0.30xFixed costs = $156,000Target net income = $60,000Using the contribution margin approach, we have:Net income = Sales - Variable costs - Fixed costs$60,000 = x - 0.70x - $156,000Solving for x:x = ($60,000 + $156,000) / 0.30x = $720,000
The management's target net income of $60,000 can be achieved by determining the required sales using the contribution margin approach. Let x be the total sales.Variable costs are 70% of sales, which can be represented as 0.70x. The contribution margin is determined as follows Contribution margin = Sales - Variable costsContribution margin ratio = Contribution margin / Sales Using the contribution margin ratio, we can calculate the contribution margin as follows:Contribution margin ratio = (Sales - Variable costs) / Sales0.30 = (x - 0.70x) / xThe contribution margin is 0.30x.Fixed costs are given as $156,000. We can now compute the required sales to achieve the management's target net income of $60,000 as follows Net income = Sales - Variable costs - Fixed costs$60,000 = x - 0.70x - $156,000$60,000 + $156,000 = 0.30x$216,000 = 0.30x$x = $720,000Explanation:To summarize, the required sales in dollars needed to achieve management's target net income of $60,000 is $720,000 using the contribution margin approach.
To know more about income Visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14732695
#SPJ11
Which utility function describes the preferences shown by this indifference map? X2 11 160504 3NH 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 X1 OA. U(X1, X2) = 2x13x2. B. U(x1, x2) = 2x1 +3x2. OC. U(x1, x2) = min{ x₁/2, x2/3}
The utility function that describes the preferences shown by the indifference map is U(x1, x2) = min{ x₁/2, x2/3}, option C.
An indifference map is the set of combinations of two goods that offer the same satisfaction to a consumer. To determine the utility function that describes the preferences shown by the given indifference map, we can examine the shape of the indifference curves and the slope of the curves.
The slope of an indifference curve represents the rate at which a consumer is willing to trade off one good for another. Therefore, the slope of an indifference curve is the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) between the two goods. This tells us the extent to which a consumer is willing to exchange one good for the other and remain indifferent between the two. The MRS of good X1 for good X2 is given as the ratio of the marginal utility of good X1 to the marginal utility of good X2. A utility function is a mathematical representation of the preferences of a consumer. Utility functions are used to represent how much satisfaction a consumer derives from consuming a combination of two or more goods.
Based on the indifference map above, it can be observed that the curves are convex to the origin. Also, the slope of the indifference curves diminishes as we move down the curve, indicating that the consumer is willing to trade less of X2 for an additional unit of X1. This implies that the MRS decreases as we move down the indifference curves. Therefore, the utility function that best describes the preferences shown by this indifference map is the one that has diminishing marginal rates of substitution. From the given options, the only function that satisfies this condition is option C.
To learn more about utility function: https://brainly.com/question/14929272
#SPJ11
Discuss the key features of the ‘Golden Age’ and ‘Stagflation' periods. According to your view, what is the key reason why Friedman's ideas about inflation became popular during the 'Stagflation' period?
The 'Golden Age' period was a time in the mid-twentieth century characterized by high economic growth, low unemployment, and rising living standards. The growth was facilitated by increased government spending on infrastructure, public services, and welfare programs.
Social welfare programs were also initiated, as well as the strengthening of trade unions, which led to increased labor bargaining power. The period was also characterized by relatively stable inflation rates, which helped to maintain low-interest rates.
On the other hand, the 'Stagflation' period was a period in the 1970s characterized by stagnant economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation rates. This period was caused by the collapse of the post-World War II economic boom, increased competition from developing countries, and the OPEC oil embargo.
Inflation was caused by high demand for goods and services and an increase in the money supply. During the period, government spending was reduced, trade unions were weakened, and deregulation occurred.
Friedman's ideas on inflation became popular during the 'Stagflation' period due to his view that inflation was caused by an increase in the money supply.
He argued that the best way to control inflation was through monetary policy, and advocated for a reduction in the money supply. His ideas became popular due to the perceived failure of Keynesian economics during the period.
The Keynesian policy of stimulating the economy through increased government spending failed to reduce inflation and increase economic growth, and led to stagflation.
In conclusion, the key features of the 'Golden Age' and 'Stagflation' periods were characterized by different economic conditions. The 'Golden Age' period was characterized by high economic growth, low unemployment, and relatively stable inflation rates.
While, the 'Stagflation' period was characterized by stagnant economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation rates.
Friedman's ideas on inflation became popular during the 'Stagflation' period due to his view that inflation was caused by an increase in the money supply and that the best way to control inflation was through monetary policy.
For more such questions on Golden Age
https://brainly.com/question/2194124
#SPJ11
given the following historical data, what is the simple three-period moving average forecast for period 6? period
1
2
3
value
73
68
65
periode
4
5
value
72
67
a. 67
b. 115
c. 69
Based on the given historical data, the simple three-period moving average forecast for period 6 is 69 (option C).
To calculate the simple three-period moving average forecast for period 6, we need to find the average of the values from periods 4, 5, and 6. The historical data provided is as follows:
Period 1: Value 73
Period 2: Value 68
Period 3: Value 65
Period 4: Value 72
Period 5: Value 67
To calculate the moving average forecast for period 6, we add the values from periods 4, 5, and 6 and then divide the sum by 3:
72 + 67 + 68 = 207
207 / 3 = 69
Therefore, the simple three-period moving average forecast for period 6 is 69. (Option c)
The moving average forecast is a commonly used technique to predict future values based on historical data. It smooths out fluctuations in the data by averaging values over a specific period. In this case, the three-period moving average is used, which means we consider the average of the previous three periods.
By calculating the moving average, we aim to identify any underlying trends or patterns in the data. It provides a more stable estimate compared to individual data points, as it takes into account multiple observations. However, it should be noted that the moving average forecast may not capture sudden changes or shifts in the data.
In summary, based on the given historical data, the simple three-period moving average forecast for period 6 is 69. (Option C)
To know more about simple three-method moving average forecast,
https://brainly.com/question/30451671
#SPJ4
the appropriate probability distribution for the random variable is
The appropriate probability distribution for the random variable "the number of boys in 15 births during an 8-hour shift at a hospital" can be modeled using the binomial distribution.
The binomial distribution is used to model situations where there are a fixed number of independent trials with a fixed probability of success and each trial has two possible outcomes (success or failure).
The outcome of interest in this situation is whether the newborn is a boy or not, and each birth can be thought of as a trial. It is believed that the likelihood of having a boy is fixed for each birth.
one can determine the odds of having various numbers of boys in 15 births over the course of an 8-hour shift at the hospital by using the binomial distribution.
Learn more about binomial distribution at:
brainly.com/question/29137961
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete, complete question " identify the appropriate probability distribution of the random variable.
- The number of boys in 15 births during an 8-hour shift at a hospital."
There are three factories on the Momiss River. Each emits two types of pollutants, labeled P1 and P2, into the river. If the waste from each factory is processed, the pollution in the river can be reduced. It costs $1500 to process a ton of factory 1 waste, and each ton processed reduces the amount of P1 by 0.10 ton and the amount of P2 by 0.45 ton. It costs $2500 to process a ton of factory 2 waste, and each ton processed reduces the amount of P1 by 0.20 ton and the amount of P2 by 0.25 ton. It costs $3000 to process a ton of factory 3 waste, and each ton processed reduces the amount of P1 by 0.40 ton and the amount of P2 by 0.50 ton. The state wants to reduce the amount of P1 in the river by at least 125 tons and the amount of P2 by at least 175 tons.
a. Use Solver to determine how to minimize the cost of reducing pollution by the desired amounts. Are the LP assumptions (proportionality, additivity, divisibility) reasonable in this problem?
b. Use SolverTable to investigate the effects of increases in the minimal reductions required by the state. Specifically, see what happens to the amounts of waste processed at the three factories and the total cost if both requirements (currently 125 and 175 tons, respectively) are increased by the same percentage. Revise your model so that you can use SolverTable to investigate these changes when the percentage increase varies from 10% to 100% in increments of 10%. Do the amounts processed at the three factories and the total cost change in a linear manner?
Solver to minimize the cost of pollution reduction while meeting the state's requirements and using SolverTable to investigate the effects of increased requirements allows us to analyze the optimal solution and observe the changes in waste processing amounts and total cost.
a. Using Solver, we can set up a linear programming (LP) model to minimize the cost of reducing pollution while meeting the state's requirements. Let's define decision variables: x1, x2, and x3 as the tons of waste processed from factories 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The objective is to minimize the total cost, which can be expressed as: 1500x1 + 2500x2 + 3000x3.
The constraints are:
For P1 reduction: 0.10x1 + 0.20x2 + 0.40x3 ≥ 125
For P2 reduction: 0.45x1 + 0.25x2 + 0.50x3 ≥ 175
Non-negativity: x1, x2, x3 ≥ 0
The LP assumptions are reasonable in this problem. Proportionality assumes that the effect of reducing pollution is directly proportional to the amount of waste processed, which holds true as the pollution reduction rates are given per ton processed. Additivity assumes that the total effect of waste processing is the sum of individual effects, which is reasonable as the pollution reduction rates are additive. Divisibility assumes that waste can be processed in fractional amounts, which is practical in real-world scenarios.
b. To investigate the effects of increasing the minimal reductions required by the state, we can use SolverTable. We'll add two input cells to the model, representing the percentage increase in the P1 and P2 requirements. We'll then modify the objective function and constraints accordingly to incorporate the increased requirements. SolverTable can be used to vary the percentage increase from 10% to 100% in increments of 10% and observe the corresponding changes in the amounts processed at the factories and the total cost.
The amounts processed at the factories and the total cost may not change in a strictly linear manner. The changes will depend on the specific pollution reduction rates, cost structures, and how the increased requirements affect the optimal solution. However, SolverTable will provide a comprehensive view of the changes and enable us to analyze the patterns and relationships between the increased requirements and the resulting costs and waste processing amounts.
To learn more about pollution reduction
https://brainly.com/question/31162455
#SPJ11
explain how to distinguish between problems you can fix with training and those you can't.
Distinguishing between problems that can be resolved through training and those that cannot requires a systematic approach.
Identify the nature of the problem: Analyze the problem to understand its root cause. Is it a knowledge or skill gap that can potentially be addressed through training? Or does it stem from structural, systemic, or organizational issues that training alone cannot solve?
Assess feasibility: Evaluate the practicality of addressing the problem through training. Consider factors like time, resources, and the complexity of the issue.
Consider training effectiveness: Reflect on the effectiveness of training in addressing similar problems in the past. Review historical data and success rates of training initiatives. Assess whether the problem at hand aligns with the areas where training has shown tangible impact.
Seek expert input: Consult subject matter experts, trainers, or experienced professionals who have dealt with similar challenges. Their insights can help determine.
Monitor and evaluate: Implement a monitoring and evaluation system to assess the impact of training interventions. If the problem persists or shows no significant improvement despite training efforts, it may indicate that the issue requires alternative solutions beyond training.
By carefully analyzing the problem, considering feasibility and effectiveness, seeking expert input, and monitoring outcomes, one can make an informed decision.
To know more about systematic approach click here
brainly.com/question/27959993
#SPJ11
Bob Knowlton is project head of the photon laboratory and was determined to produce work that would put him ahead in his career. As the leader of the team, he was known for staying at the lab and working late, long after the rest of his team had gone home. Knowlton’s boss, Dr. Jerrold, told him during his interview, "The person who produces gets ahead in this outfit," and "The sky’s the limit for people who can produce!" It seems that message really stuck with Knowlton.
The case "Bob Knowlton" is a true story about a talented engineer who was promoted to project leader in charge of a team. Bob Knowlton is the project head of the photon laboratory and was determined to produce work that would put him ahead in his career.
As the leader of the team, he was known for staying at the lab and working late, long after the rest of his team had gone home. Dr. Jerrold, Knowlton's boss, had said to him during his interview that "The person who produces gets ahead in this outfit," and "The sky’s the limit for people who can produce!" This message stuck with Knowlton, and he was now eager to show Dr. Jerrold that he could produce.
However, Knowlton's dedication and hard work did not go unnoticed, and Dr. Jerrold brought in a new hire named Fester, who was tasked with supervising Knowlton. Knowlton was not pleased with this and thought that it was a demotion instead of a promotion.
Knowlton became even more disgruntled when he realized that Fester was charming and charismatic, and he was stealing his thunder. Knowlton's team was also giving Fester more attention and ignoring him. Knowlton's work was not being recognized, and he felt that his career was stalling, so he became depressed and disengaged, and his performance started to decline.
Knowlton was so disenchanted with his work that he quit. He cited his lack of opportunities, recognition, and no challenges. He felt that he was undervalued and underutilized.
You can learn more about project leaders at: brainly.com/question/14338057
#SPJ11
Rationality and WARP. Suppose that the rational preference relation generates the Walrasian demand function x(p, w). Show that this demand function must satisfy the weak axiom of revealed preference, being sure to carefully define the relevant terms.
The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) is a fundamental theoretical criterion for the consistency of economic behavior that is necessary to ensure the existence of a utility function that reflects the preferences of a rational consumer.
The Walrasian demand function x(p, w) can be derived from a rational preference relation by a two-stage process: First, the rational preference relation generates a set of feasible consumption bundles (or budget sets) that are consistent with the consumer's income and the prices of the goods. Second, the consumer chooses a consumption bundle that maximizes his or her utility subject to the budget constraint. The Walrasian demand function x(p, w) gives the quantity of each good that the consumer demands as a function of the prices and the income.
If the consumer's preferences are rational, then the Walrasian demand function x(p, w) must satisfy the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP).The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) is a condition that requires that if a consumer chooses a consumption bundle x over another consumption bundle y when the prices and income are (p,w), then the consumer must also choose x over y when the prices and income are (p',w'), where p' is any price vector that is not equal to p and w' is any income level that is not smaller than w.
To know more about Preference visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32499952
#SPJ11
Today, the 2-year spot interest rate in the UK is 0.1%. The 2-year spot interest rate in the US is 1.16%. The spot FX market tells me that £1 is worth exactly $1.25 today. If the market two-year forward exchange rate of Sterling for US Dollars is $1.29 per £1, demonstrate whether an arbitrage is available and, if so, demonstrate how to exploit it.
The UK's 2-year spot interest rate is 0.1%, whereas the US's 2-year spot interest rate is 1.16%. The exchange rate between pounds and dollars is £1 for $1.25, and the two-year forward exchange rate is $1.29 per £1.
Using the formula: F = S(1 + i*d), where F is the two-year forward exchange rate, S is the spot exchange rate, i is the foreign interest rate, and d is the time period in years. Let us determine the arbitrage opportunity: UK: 2-year spot interest rate = 0.1%US: 2-year spot interest rate = 1.16%Spot FX rate = £1 for $1.25Forward FX rate (2-year) = $1.29 per £1. The expected forward exchange rate after two years, according to the formula F = S(1 + i*d), is: F = $1.25 (1 + 0.1% * 2 years)/1 £F = $1.254 per £1The current forward exchange rate is $1.29 per £1, whereas the expected forward exchange rate is $1.254 per £1.
An arbitrage opportunity exists as the forward rate is overvalued or too expensive at $1.29 per £1. The arbitrage opportunity can be exploited in the following way:
Step 1: Convert $1 into £0.8 (buy pounds)
Step 2: Invest the pounds in the UK at 0.1% for two years
step 3: After two years, we will get £0.8002. Step 4: £0.8002 will be converted into dollars at the new forward rate of $1.254 per £1, resulting in $1.003.
Step 5: The $1.003 will be invested in the US at 1.16% for two years.
Step 6: After two years, we will receive $1.0505.
Step 7: $1.0505 is converted back to pounds at the spot rate of $1.25 per £1, resulting in £0.8404.
Step 8: The £0.8404 is compared to the initial amount of £0.8 to determine the arbitrage profit:
Profit = £0.8404 - £0.8 = £0.0404
Hence, the arbitrage profit is £0.0404. Therefore, we can exploit the arbitrage opportunity.
To know more about arbitrage opportunity please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/15394730
#SPJ11