Use the method of undetermined cool mined coeffi- cients to find a particular solution to the given higher-order equation.

a. y" - y" + y = sint 34.
b. 2y" + 3y" + y' - 4y = e*
c. y" + y" - 2y = te
d. y(4) – 3y" – 8y = sint

The critical points of the function f(x) = -6 sin(x) over the interval [0, 2π] can be found by determining where the derivative f'(x) equals zero or is undefined.

Step 1: Find the derivative f'(x) using the chain rule. For -6 sin(x), the derivative is f'(x) = -6 cos(x).

Step 2: Set f'(x) = 0 and solve for x. In this case, we have -6 cos(x) = 0. Dividing by -6 gives cos(x) = 0.

Step 3: Determine the values of x in the interval [0, 2π] where cos(x) = 0. These values are x = π/2 and x = 3π/2.

Therefore, the critical points of the function f(x) = -6 sin(x) over the interval [0, 2π] are x = π/2 and x = 3π/2.

To know more about critical points click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31017064#

#SPJ11

For the STAT51 professor, we can say that we are 80% confident that the true average grade of all students in the class is between 88.83% and 106.04%.

a) To construct an 80% confidence interval for the population mean, we can use the t-distribution since the sample size is relatively small (n = 16) and the population standard deviation is unknown. The formula for the confidence interval is:

CI = X ± t(α/2, n-1) * (s/√n)

where X is the sample mean, s is the sample standard deviation, n is the sample size, t(α/2, n-1) is the t-value with a degrees of freedom of n-1 and a probability of α/2 in the tails, and α is the level of significance (1- confidence level).

Using a t-table, we find that the t-value with 15 degrees of freedom and a probability of 0.1 (since 1-0.8 = 0.2 and we want the probability in the tails) is approximately 1.753.

Plugging in the values from the sample, we get:

CI = 97.4375 ± 1.753 * (13.2926/√16)

= (88.8321, 106.0429)

Therefore, the 80% confidence interval for the population mean is (88.8321, 106.0429).

b) The interpretation of a confidence interval is that, if we were to take multiple samples from the same population and construct a confidence interval for each sample, a certain percentage of those intervals would contain the true population mean. In this case, if we were to take many samples of size 16 from the same population, and construct an 80% confidence interval for each sample, we would expect that 80% of those intervals would contain the true population mean.

For the STAT51 professor, we can say that we are 80% confident that the true average grade of all students in the class is between 88.83% and 106.04%.

c) The 80% confidence interval is narrower than the 95% confidence interval because a higher level of confidence requires a wider interval. In other words, if we want to be more certain that the interval contains the true population mean, we need to include more values in the interval, which leads to a wider range of possible values. Conversely, if we want a narrower interval, we can be less confident that the interval contains the true population mean. This trade-off between confidence and precision is an inherent property of statistical inference.

To learn more about probability visit: https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

For the STAT51 professor, we can say that we are 80% confident that the true average grade of all students in the class is between 88.83% and 106.04%.

a) To construct an 80% confidence interval for the population mean, we can use the t-distribution since the sample size is relatively small (n = 16) and the population standard deviation is unknown. The formula for the confidence interval is:

CI = X ± t(α/2, n-1) * (s/√n)

where X is the sample mean, s is the sample standard deviation, n is the sample size, t(α/2, n-1) is the t-value with a degrees of freedom of n-1 and a probability of α/2 in the tails, and α is the level of significance (1- confidence level).

Using a t-table, we find that the t-value with 15 degrees of freedom and a probability of 0.1 (since 1-0.8 = 0.2 and we want the probability in the tails) is approximately 1.753.

Plugging in the values from the sample, we get:

CI = 97.4375 ± 1.753 * (13.2926/√16)

= (88.8321, 106.0429)

Therefore, the 80% confidence interval for the population mean is (88.8321, 106.0429).

b) The interpretation of a confidence interval is that, if we were to take multiple samples from the same population and construct a confidence interval for each sample, a certain percentage of those intervals would contain the true population mean. In this case, if we were to take many samples of size 16 from the same population, and construct an 80% confidence interval for each sample, we would expect that 80% of those intervals would contain the true population mean.

For the STAT51 professor, we can say that we are 80% confident that the true average grade of all students in the class is between 88.83% and 106.04%.

c) The 80% confidence interval is narrower than the 95% confidence interval because a higher level of confidence requires a wider interval. In other words, if we want to be more certain that the interval contains the true population mean, we need to include more values in the interval, which leads to a wider range of possible values. Conversely, if we want a narrower interval, we can be less confident that the interval contains the true population mean. This trade-off between confidence and precision is an inherent property of statistical inference.

To learn more about probability visit: https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

To prove that n! < n^n for all integers n ≥ 2 using generalized induction, we'll follow these steps: 1. Base case: Verify the inequality for the smallest value of n, which is n = 2.

2. Inductive step: Assume the inequality is true for some integer k ≥ 2, and then prove it for k + 1.
Base case (n = 2): 2! = 2 < 2^2 = 4, which is true.
Inductive step:
Assume that k! < k^k for some integer k ≥ 2.
Now, we need to prove that (k + 1)! < (k + 1)^(k + 1).

We can write (k + 1)! as (k + 1) * k! and use our assumption: (k + 1)! = (k + 1) * k! < (k + 1) * k^k, To show that (k + 1) * k^k < (k + 1)^(k + 1), we need to show that k^k < (k + 1)^, We know that k ≥ 2, so (k + 1) > k, and therefore (k + 1)^k > k^k.
Now, we have (k + 1)! < (k + 1) * k^k < (k + 1)^(k + 1).Thus, by generalized induction, n! < n^n for all integers n ≥ 2.

To know more about integers click here

brainly.com/question/10930045

#SPJ11

The numerical value of the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval is approximately 1.88 μg/l.

The margin of error for a confidence interval is half of the width of the interval.

The width of the interval is the difference between the upper and lower bounds of the interval. The calculated value of width of the interval is

11.98 μg/l - 8.22 μg/l = 3.76 μg/l

Therefore, the margin of error is half of this width

3.76 μg/l / 2 = 1.88 μg/l

Rounding to two decimal places, the margin of error is approximately 1.88 μg/l.

To know more about confidence interval:

https://brainly.com/question/29680703

#SPJ4

Since the denominator approaches 0 and the numerator is constant, the limit goes to -infinity: -∞

To evaluate the limit lim_(x->infinity) x tan(3/x), we can use the fact that as x approaches infinity, 3/x approaches zero. Therefore, we can rewrite the limit as lim_(y->0) (3/tan(y))/y, where y=3/x.

Using the limit identity lim_(y->0) (tan(y))/y = 1, we can simplify the expression as:

lim_(y->0) (3/tan(y))/y = lim_(y->0) 3/(tan(y)*y) = 3 lim_(y->0) 1/(tan(y)*y)

Now, we can use another limit identity lim_(y->0) (1-cos(y))/[tex]y^2[/tex] = 1/2, which implies lim_(y->0) cos(y)/[tex]y^2[/tex] = 1/2.

Multiplying and dividing by cos(y) in the denominator of the expression, we get:

lim_(y->0) 1/(tan(y)*y) = lim_(y->0) cos(y)/(sin(y)*y*cos(y)) = lim_(y->0) cos(y)/[tex]y^2[/tex] * 1/sin(y)

Using the limit identity above, we can rewrite this as:

lim_(y->0) cos(y)/[tex]y^2[/tex] * 1/sin(y) = 1/2 * lim_(y->0) 1/sin(y) = infinity

Therefore, the limit lim_(x->infinity) x tan(3/x) equals infinity.
To evaluate the limit lim_(x->infinity) x*tan(3/x), we can apply L'Hopital's Rule since this is an indeterminate form of the type ∞*0.

First, let y = 3/x. Then, as x -> infinity, y -> 0, and we rewrite the limit as:
lim_(y->0) (3/y) * tan(y)

Now, take the derivatives of both the numerator and the denominator with respect to y:
d(3/y)/dy = -3/[tex]y^2[/tex]
d(tan(y))/dy = [tex]sec^2[/tex](y)

Using L'Hopital's Rule, the limit becomes:
lim_(y->0) (-3/[tex]y^2[/tex]) / [tex]sec^2(y)[/tex]

As y approaches 0,[/tex]sec^2(y)[/tex] approaches 1, so the limit simplifies to:
lim_(y->0) (-3/[tex]y^2)[/tex]

To learn more about expression visit;

brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ11

The probability that Devin, Erin, and Hana will be selected again is 1 / 10.

An adept approach to calculating the chance of Devin, Erin, and Hana being picked again is through the utilization of the combinations formula. This efficient formula calculates the total amount of possible ways 3 pupils can be selected from a group of 5:

C ( n, k ) = n ! / (k ! ( n - k ) ! )

C (5, 3) = 5 ! / (3 !( 5 - 3 ) ! )

= 120 / 12

= 10

The probability that Devin, Erin, and Hana will be selected again is:

=  Number of ways they can be selected / Total number of ways to select 3 students

= 1 / 10

Find out more on probability at https://brainly.com/question/30210045

#SPJ1

In case whereby Priya's favorite singer has made 6 albums containing 75 songs in total. Priya wants to make a playlist of 10 of those songs, and she won't repeat 1 of the 75 songs the appropriate values of n and r are 75  and 10 respectively.

A permutation  can be described as the number of ways  that can be used to write a set  so that it can be be arranged , this can be expressed as the  number of ways things can be arranged.

Using the permutation, the order  can be written as nPr howver based on the given conditions from the question, she is goig to pick 10 songs from 75 songs so that it can be arranged for thr playlist. The number of ways can be written as 75P10.

Learn more about permutation at:

https://brainly.com/question/12468032

#SPJ1

The volume of the cylinder is 2797.74 cubic meters whose radius is 9m and height is 11m

Volume is defined as the space occupied within the boundaries of an object in three-dimensional space.

Given that radius is 9m and height is 11m

The formula for volume is πr²h

Plug in the values of radius and height

Volume = π(9)²(11)

=3.14×81×11

=2797.74 cubic meters

Hence, the volume of the cylinder is 2797.74 cubic meters whose radius is 9m and height is 11m

To learn more on Volume click:

https://brainly.com/question/13798973

#SPJ3

If Coy needs to buy more than 8 pairs of socks, shopping at Sports Superstore will be cheaper than shopping at Sport 'n Stuff.

An inequality is a comparison between two numbers or expressions that are not equal to one another. Indicating which value is less or greater than the other, or simply different, are symbols like, >,,, or.

Let's call the number of pairs of socks Coy needs to buy "x".

If he shops at Sport 'n Stuff, the cost will be:

Cost at Sport 'n Stuff = $22 (for cleats) + $4x (for socks)

If he shops at Sports Superstore, the cost will be:

Cost at Sports Superstore = $28 (for cleats) + $3.25x (for socks)

We want to find the value of "x" for which shopping at Sports Superstore is cheaper than shopping at Sport 'n Stuff. In other words, we want:

Cost at Sports Superstore < Cost at Sport 'n Stuff

Substituting the expressions we found earlier, we get:

$28 + $3.25x < $22 + $4x

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

$28 - $22 < $4x - $3.25x

$6 < $0.75x

8 < x

Therefore, If Coy needs to buy more than 8 pairs of socks, shopping at Sports Superstore will be cheaper than shopping at Sport 'n Stuff.

Learn more about Sports on:

https://brainly.com/question/30032950

#SPJ1

Using a t-distribution table, here with 46 degrees of freedom (n-1), the critical value for a two-tailed test with a level of significance of α = 0.10 is ±2.575. Therefore, we reject H0 if the standardized test statistic is greater than 2.575 or less than -2.575. The correct answer is D. Reject H0 if the standardized test statistic is greater than 2.575 or less than -2.575.

To determine whether to reject H0, we need to calculate the standardized test statistic using the formula (sample mean - hypothesized mean) / (standard deviation / square root of sample size). Since the null hypothesis is that μ = 3.5, the sample mean and standard deviation must be used to calculate the standardized test statistic.
Assuming a normal distribution, with a sample size of n=47 and a level of significance of α = 0.10, we can use a two-tailed test with a critical value of ±1.645. However, since we are testing for μ ≠ 3.5, this is a two-tailed test, and we need to use a critical value that accounts for both tails.

Learn more about t-distribution here, https://brainly.com/question/17469144

#SPJ11

OK, analicemos cada inciso:

a) Su posición o elongación a los 5 segundos

Si el período del movimiento armónico simple es 1.25 segundos, en 5 segundos habrán transcurrido 5/1.25 = 4 períodos completos.

Por lo tanto, la posición o elongación a los 5 segundos será:

x = 0.3 * cos(4*pi*t/1.25)

Sustituyendo t = 5 segundos:

x = 0.3 * cos(4*pi*5/1.25) = 0.3 * cos(20pi/5) = 0.3

b) ¿Cuál es su velocidad a los 5 segundos?

Calculamos la velocidad como la derivada de la posición con respecto al tiempo:

v = -0.3 * sen(4*pi*t/1.25)

Sustituyendo t = 5 segundos:

v = -0.3 * sen(20pi/5) = -0.3

c) ¿Qué velocidad alcanzo?

El movimiento es armónico simple, por lo que la velocidad máxima alcanzada será:

v_max = 0.3 * (2*pi/1.25) = 1

d) ¿Cuál es su aceleración máxima?

La aceleración es la derivada de la velocidad con respecto al tiempo:

a = -0.3 * cos(4*pi*t/1.25)

La aceleración máxima se obtiene tomando la derivada:

a_max = -0.3 * (4*pi/1.25)^2 = -3

Por lo tanto, la aceleración máxima es -3

First, we can write the quadratic function in the form:

ax^2 + bx + c = a(x^2 + (b/a)x) + c

ax^2 + bx + c = a(x^2 + (b/a)x + (b/2a)^2 - (b/2a)^2) + c

ax^2 + bx + c = a[(x + (b/2a))^2 - (b/2a)^2] + c

minimum value of this expression occurs when (x + (b/2a))^2 = 0, which is only possible when x = -(b/2a)

ax^2 + bx + c = a(0 - (b/2a)^2) + c = -b^2/4a + c

the minimum value of the quadratic function is -(Δ/4a), which is equivalent to -b^2/4a when a > 0

the function is zero when x = 1, so we can write:

a(1)^2 + b(1) + c = 0

a + b + c = 0

ax^2 + bx + c = a(x - h)^2 + k, where h = -b/2a and k = -b^2/4a + c

the value of the function at x = 0 is 5, so we have:

a(0)^2 + b(0) + c = 5

c = 5

k = -b^2/4a + c

k = -(-a-5)^2/4a + 5

Simplifying this expression, we get:

k = (-a^2 - 10a - 25)/4a + 5

k = (-a^2 - 10a + 15)/4a

Since we know that k = -4, we can write:

-4 = (-a^2 - 10a + 15)/4a

Multiplying both sides by 4a, we get:

-16a = -a^2 - 10a + 15

Simplifying this equation, we get:

a^2 - 6a - 15 = 0

Factoring this quadratic equation, we get:

(a - 5)(a + 3) = 0

So, either a = 5 or a = -3. If a = 5, we can solve for b using the equation a + b

*IG:whis.sama_ent

The given statement "The boundaries for the critical region for a two-tailed test using a t statistic with α = .05 will never be less than ±1.96." is false because critical region boundaries for a two-tailed test using a t statistic depend on the degrees of freedom (df) and the chosen significance level (α).

The critical region boundaries for a two-tailed test using a t statistic depend on the degrees of freedom (df) and the chosen significance level (α).

The value of ±1.96 comes from the standard normal distribution (z-distribution) when α = .05.

However, the t distribution is used when the sample size is small, and its shape depends on the degrees of freedom.

As the degrees of freedom increase, the t distribution approaches the standard normal distribution, and the critical values will get closer to ±1.96.

But for smaller degrees of freedom, the critical values can be greater than ±1.96.

This means the boundaries for the critical region can sometimes be greater than ±1.96, not always less than that.

Therefore, the given statement is false.

Learn more about two-tailed test:

https://brainly.com/question/4621112

#SPJ11

The required answer is a - bi, is also a root of the equation.

If a bi is a root of a polynomial equation with real coefficients, then its complex conjugate, a - bi, is also a root of the equation. This is because if a + bi is a root, then its complex conjugate a - bi must also be a root since the coefficients of the polynomial are real. a polynomial is an expression consisting of indeterminates (also called variables) and coefficients, that involves only the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and positive-integer powers of variables. the coefficients of this polynomial, and are generally non-constant functions. A coefficient is a constant coefficient when it is a constant function. For avoiding confusion, the coefficient that is not attached to unknown functions and their derivative is generally called the constant term rather the constant coefficient. Polynomials are taught in algebra, which is a gateway course to all technical subjects. Mathematicians  use polynomials to solve problems.

A coefficient is a multiplicative factor in some term of a polynomial, a series, or an expression; it is usually a number, but may be any expression (including variables such as a, b and c).[1][better source needed] When the coefficients are themselves variables, they may also be called parameters. If a polynomial has only one term, it is called a "monomial". Monomial are also the building blocks of polynomials.

In a term, the multiplier out in front is called a "coefficient". The letter is called an "unknown" or a "variable", and the raised number after the letter is called an exponent. A polynomial is an algebraic expression in which the only arithmetic is addition, subtraction, multiplication and whole number exponentiation.

If a + bi is a root of a polynomial equation with real coefficients, then its complex conjugate, a - bi, is also a root of the equation.

To  know more about  polynomial equation. Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/30127172

#SPJ11

The cost of wrapping all the 3 boxes is $240.

Given that a shoe box of dimension 14 in × 8 in × 4 in, has been covered by a paper wrap before shipping, we need to find the cost of covering 3 boxes if cost of wrapping is $0.2 per in².

To find the same we will find the total surface area of the box and then multiply it by 0.2 then by 3 to find the cost of wrapping all the 3 boxes.

The total surface area of a box = (2LW + 2WH + 2LH)

Where,

length of box = L

height of box = H

width of box = W

Therefore,

Surface area of 3 boxes = 3×(2LW + 2WH + 2LH) sq.in.

= 3 × 2 × (14×4 + 14×8 + 8×4)

= 6 × (56 + 112 + 32)

= 6 × 200

= 1200 in²

Since, the cost of packing one sq. in. = $0.02

Therefore,

The cost of packing 3 boxes = 1200 × 0.02 dollars = $240

Hence, the cost of wrapping all the 3 boxes is $240.

Learn more about total surface area, click;

https://brainly.com/question/8419462

#SPJ1

a) To find the equilibrium points, we set x' = 0 and solve for x:

x' = x - x^2 = 0

x(1 - x) = 0

So x = 0 or x = 1.

To find the equilibrium points, we set the derivative x' equal to zero and solve for x. In this case, x' = x - x^2 = 0. By factoring out x, we obtain x(1 - x) = 0, which leads to two possible equilibrium points: x = 0 and x = 1.

To classify the stability of these points, we analyze the sign of x' near each point. For x = 0, x' = x = 0, indicating a neutrally stable equilibrium. For x = 1, x' = -x^2 < 0 when x is slightly greater than 1, implying a stable equilibrium. These classifications indicate how the system behaves around each equilibrium point.

To classify the equilibrium points, we find the sign of x' near each equilibrium point.

For x = 0, we have x' = x = 0, so the equilibrium point is neutrally stable. For x = 1, we have x' = -x^2 < 0 when x is slightly greater than 1, so the equilibrium point is stable.

To know more about equilibrium points refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1527528

#SPJ11

Make sure to label your axis and include important points such as the corner frequency and gain crossover frequency.

To join line segments for a Bode plot, you first need to have the transfer function of the system you are analyzing. Then, you can break down the transfer function into smaller segments, each representing a different frequency range. You can then plot each segment on the Bode plot and connect them together to form a continuous curve. This will give you a visual representation of the system's frequency response. Make sure to label your axis and include important points such as the corner frequency and gain crossover frequency.

learn more about Bode plot

https://brainly.com/question/31322290

#SPJ11

Make sure to label your axis and include important points such as the corner frequency and gain crossover frequency.

To join line segments for a Bode plot, you first need to have the transfer function of the system you are analyzing. Then, you can break down the transfer function into smaller segments, each representing a different frequency range. You can then plot each segment on the Bode plot and connect them together to form a continuous curve. This will give you a visual representation of the system's frequency response. Make sure to label your axis and include important points such as the corner frequency and gain crossover frequency.

learn more about Bode plot

https://brainly.com/question/31322290

#SPJ11

We requires a positive volume, we can conclude that there is no minimum volume subject to the given constraint

Let r be the radius of the can, and let h be its height. We want to minimize the volume V = πr^2h subject to the constraint A = 2πrh + 2π[tex]r^2[/tex] = 54.

We can solve for h in terms of r using the constraint equation:

2πrh + 2π[tex]r^2[/tex] = 54

h = (54 - 2π[tex]r^2[/tex]) / (2πr)

Substituting this expression for h into the expression for V, we get:

V = π[tex]r^2[/tex] [(54 - 2π[tex]r^2[/tex]) / (2πr)]

V = (27/π) [tex]r^2[/tex] (54/π - [tex]r^2[/tex])

To find the minimum value of V, we can differentiate it with respect to r and set the result equal to zero:

dV/dr = (27/π) r (108/π - 3[tex]r^2[/tex]) = 0

This equation has solutions r = 0 (which corresponds to a minimum volume of 0) and r = sqrt(36/π) = 2.7247 (rounded to four decimal places). To check that this value gives a minimum, we can check the second derivative:

[tex]d^2V/dr^2[/tex] = (27/π) (108/π - 9r^2)

At r = 2.7247, we have [tex]d^2V/dr^2[/tex] = -22.37, which is negative, so this is a local maximum. Therefore, the only critical point that gives a minimum is r = 0, which corresponds to a zero volume.

Since the problem requires a positive volume, we can conclude that there is no minimum volume subject to the given constraint.

Learn more about radius

brainly.com/question/13449316

#SPJ11

The solution to the IVP is:

[tex]y(x) = (43/20)e^{(6x)} - (27/20)e^{(-x)} - (63/20) + (47/20)e^{(x)][/tex]

The given differential equation is:

[tex]d^2y/dx^2 - 5dy/dx - 6y = 0[/tex]

The auxiliary equation is:

[tex]r^2 - 5r - 6 = 0[/tex]

This can be factored as:

(r - 6)(r + 1) = 0

So, the roots are r = 6 and r = -1.

The two fundamental solutions are:

[tex]y1(x) = e^{(6x)} and y2(x) = e^{(-x)}[/tex]

To solve the initial value problem (IVP), we need to find the constants c1 and c2 such that the general solution satisfies the initial conditions:

y(0) = -7 and y'(0) = 7

The general solution is:

[tex]y(x) = c1e^{(6x)} + c2e^{(-x)}[/tex]

Taking the derivative with respect to x, we get:

[tex]y'(x) = 6c1e^{(6x)}- c2e^{(-x)}[/tex]

Using the initial condition y(0) = -7, we get:

c1 + c2 = -7

Using the initial condition y'(0) = 7, we get:

6c1 - c2 = 7

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get:

[tex]c1 = (43/20)e^{(-6x)} - (27/20)e^{(x)}[/tex]

[tex]c2 = -(63/20)e^{(-6x)} + (47/20)e^{(x)}[/tex]

Therefore, the solution to the IVP is:

[tex]y(x) = (43/20)e^{(6x)} - (27/20)e^{(-x)} - (63/20) + (47/20)e^{(x)][/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]y(x) = (43/20)e^(6x) + (7/20)e^{(-x)} - (63/20)[/tex]

Learn more about auxiliary equation

brainly.com/question/18521479

#SPJ11

15 non-collinear points on a plane determine 105 lines

To find the number of lines determined by 15 non-collinear points on a plane, we can use the combination formula. The combination formula is written as C(n, k) = n! / (k!(n-k)!), where n is the total number of elements and k is the number of elements we want to choose from the total.

In this case, we have 15 points (n = 15) and we need to choose 2 points (k = 2) to form a line. Applying the combination formula:

C(15, 2) = 15! / (2!(15-2)!) = 15! / (2! * 13!) = (15 * 14) / (2 * 1) = 105

Therefore, 15 non-collinear points on a plane determine 105 lines.

Learn more about collinear here,

https://brainly.com/question/31613508

#SPJ11

The change in position of particle in the first 3.5 hours using differentials is ds = 3.5 - π

What is differentials?

When an automobile negotiates a turn, the differential is a device that enables the driving wheels to rotate at various speeds. The outside wheel must move farther during a turn, which requires it to move more quickly than the inside wheels.

s(t) = sin t   (i.e., t = 3.5 hours)

ds/dt = cos t

ds = cos(t) dt    -> equation 1

as t = 3.5 takes a = 3.14 ≅ π (which is near to 3.5)

dt = (3.5 - π)

cos (a) = cos π  = -1

Now substitute in equation 1:

ds = -1 (3.5 - π)

ds = 3.5 - π

Thus, the change in position of particle in the first 3.5 hours using differentials is ds = 3.5 - π

To know more about differentials check the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/1164377

#SPJ1

The probability density function of the random variable Y defined by Y = log X is [tex]f_Y(y) = e^{(-e^y)} e^y[/tex] for y ∈ R, and 0 otherwise.

To compute the probability density function (PDF) of the random variable Y, defined by Y = log X, where X is an exponential random variable with parameter λ = 1, follow these steps:

1. First, identify the PDF of the exponential random variable X with λ = 1.

The PDF is given by:
[tex]f_X(x) = \lambda * e^{(-\lambda x)} = e^{(-x)}[/tex] for x ≥ 0, and 0 otherwise.

2. Next, consider the transformation Y = log X.

To find the inverse transformation, take the exponent of both sides:
[tex]X = e^Y[/tex].

3. Now, we'll find the Jacobian of the inverse transformation.

The Jacobian is the derivative of X with respect to Y:
[tex]dX/dY = d(e^Y)/dY = e^Y[/tex].

4. Finally, we'll compute the PDF of the random variable Y using the change of variables formula:
[tex]f_Y(y) = f_X(x) * |dX/dY|[/tex], evaluated at [tex]x = e^y[/tex].

Plugging in the PDF of X and the Jacobian, we get:
[tex]f_Y(y) = e^{(-e^y)} e^y[/tex] for y ∈ R, and 0 otherwise.

So, the probability density function of the random variable Y defined by Y = log X, where X is an exponential random variable with parameter λ = 1, is [tex]f_Y(y) = e^{(-e^y)} e^y[/tex] for y ∈ R, and 0 otherwise.

Learn more about the probability density function:

https://brainly.com/question/30403935

#SPJ11

The function of given set of points is linear, because the graph containing the points is a straight line and its equation is  [tex]y = (\frac{2}{5} )x + 3[/tex]

A diagram in x-y hub plot is a visual portrayal of numerical capabilities or data of interest on a Cartesian direction framework.

To determine if the function represented by the given set of points is linear, we can check if the slope between any two points is constant.

Let's consider the slope between the points (-5, 1) and (0, 3):

slope = (change in y)/(change in x) = (3 - 1)/(0 - (-5)) = 2/5

Now, let's consider the slope between the points (0, 3) and (5, 5):

slope = (change in y)/(change in x) = (5 - 3)/(5 - 0) = 2/5

Since the slopes between the two pairs of points are the same, we can conclude that the function represented by the given set of points is linear.

The point-slope form of a line's equation can be used to determine the line's equation:

⇒ y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

where (x₁ , y₁) is one of the given points, and m is the slope. Let's use the point (0, 3):

⇒ [tex]y - 3 = (\frac{2}{5} )(x - 0)[/tex]

⇒  [tex]y = (\frac{2}{5} )x + 3[/tex]

Therefore, the function represented by the given set of points is linear, and its equation is [tex]y = (\frac{2}{5} )x + 3[/tex]

To know more about graph, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11803331

#SPJ1

Answer:

The perimeter of a square field is the sum of the lengths of all four sides. Let s be the length of one side of the square. Then, the perimeter P is given by:

P = 4s

We know that the perimeter of the field is 1 1/2 miles, which is equal to 1.5 miles. So we can set up the equation:

4s = 1.5

Dividing both sides by 4, we get:

s = 0.375

Therefore, the length of one side of the square field is 0.375 miles or 1980 feet.

The first five terms of the sequence are a₁ = 3, a₂ = 11, a₃ = 35, a₄ = 107 and a₅ = 323

A recursive formula, also known as a recurrence relation, is a formula that defines a sequence in terms of its previous terms. It is a way of defining a sequence recursively, by specifying the relationship between the current term and the previous terms of the sequence.

To find the first five terms of the sequence, we can apply the recursive formula

a₁ = 3

aₙ = 3aₙ₋₁ + 2 for n > 1

Using this formula, we can find each term in the sequence by substituting the previous term into the formula.

a₂ = 3a₁ + 2 = 3(3) + 2 = 11

a₃ = 3a₂ + 2 = 3(11) + 2 = 35

a₄ = 3a₃ + 2 = 3(35) + 2 = 107

a₅ = 3a₄ + 2 = 3(107) + 2 = 323

Learn more about recursive formula here

brainly.com/question/8972906

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Write the first five terms of the sequence where a₁ =3, aₙ =3aₙ₋₁ +2, For all n > 1

the size of the bacterial population after 4 hours would be approximately 515396.08 bacteria.

The doubling period of a bacterial population is the amount of time it takes for the population to double in size. In this case, the doubling period is 10 minutes. This means that every 10 minutes, the bacterial population will double in size.

At time t = 120 minutes, the bacterial population was 80000. We can use this information to find the initial population at time t = 0. We can do this by working backward from the known population at t = 120 minutes.

If the doubling period is 10 minutes, then in 120 minutes (12 doubling periods), the population would have doubled 12 times. Therefore, the initial population at t = 0 must have been 80000 divided by 2 raised to the power of 12:

Initial population[tex]= \frac{80000} { 2^{12}}[/tex]
Initial population = 1.953125

So, the initial population at t = 0 was approximately 1.95 bacteria.

To find the size of the bacterial population after 4 hours (240 minutes), we can use the doubling period of 10 minutes again.

In 240 minutes (24 doubling periods), the population would have doubled 24 times. Therefore, the size of the bacterial population after 4 hours would be:

Population after 4 hours = initial population x[tex]2^{24}[/tex]
Population after 4 hours =[tex]1.953125 *2^{24}[/tex]Population after 4 hours = 515396.075

So, the size of the bacterial population after 4 hours would be approximately 515396.08 bacteria.

learn more about the initial population

https://brainly.com/question/24073375

#SPJ11

The effect of each transformation is given as follows:

Examples of transformations are given as follows:

The measures that are preserved for each transformation are given as follows:

More can be learned about transformations in a figure at https://brainly.com/question/28687396

#SPJ1

Answer:

  £4838.11

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the amount in an account after 2 years and 5 months if interest is compounded monthly with an effective rate of 5% per year. The beginning balance is £4300.

If the amount of interest earned from monthly compounding is identical to the amount earned by annual compounding, the effective monthly multiplier is ...

  1.05^(1/12) ≈ 1.00407412

which is an effective monthly rate of 0.407412%, and an annual rate of 12 times that, about 4.88895%.

The balance after 29 months using the monthly rate of 0.407412% will be ...

  £4300·1.00407412^29 ≈ £4838.11

__

Additional comment

The key wording here is that the monthly compounding results in the same amount of interest being earned as for annual compounding at 5%. That is, the effective rate of the interest compounded monthly is 5% over a year's time.