What factor(s) affect the solubility of a slightly soluble salt? Choose all correct answers.
Particle size
pH
Formation of complex ions
The presence of uncommon ions
Temperature
The presence of oxygen gas
The amount of undissolved solid present
The presence of a common ion

A molecule with a net dipole moment is considered polar,a molecule with no net dipole moment is considered nonpolar.

True, bond polarity and molecular shape determine molecular polarity, which is measured as a dipole moment. Bond polarity arises from differences in electronegativity between atoms in a bond, leading to an uneven distribution of electron density and creating a dipole.

Molecular polarity is the overall polarity of the entire molecule, considering both the bond polarities and the molecular shape. A molecule with a net dipole moment is considered polar, while a molecule with no net dipole moment is considered nonpolar.

Learn more about dipole moment

brainly.com/question/14140953

#SPJ11

A molecule with a net dipole moment is considered polar,a molecule with no net dipole moment is considered nonpolar.

True, bond polarity and molecular shape determine molecular polarity, which is measured as a dipole moment. Bond polarity arises from differences in electronegativity between atoms in a bond, leading to an uneven distribution of electron density and creating a dipole.

Molecular polarity is the overall polarity of the entire molecule, considering both the bond polarities and the molecular shape. A molecule with a net dipole moment is considered polar, while a molecule with no net dipole moment is considered nonpolar.

Learn more about dipole moment

brainly.com/question/14140953

#SPJ11

If benzene were alkylated with n-butyl chloride, the most likely product formed would be n-butylbenzene, which is a monoalkylated product. This reaction is an example of Friedel-Crafts alkylation, which involves the use of a Lewis acid catalyst, such as aluminum chloride (AlCl₃).

The reaction can lead to the formation of multiple monoalkylated products due to the possibility of substitution at different positions on the benzene ring.

However, in the case of n-butyl chloride, the major product obtained would be n-butylbenzene, which is formed by substitution of the butyl group at the ortho or para position on the benzene ring.

This is because these positions are more accessible to the incoming alkyl group and also stabilize the intermediate carbocation formed during the reaction.

The other possible monoalkylated products that could be formed are sec-butylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene, which are formed by substitution of the butyl group at the meta position on the benzene ring.

However, these products are less favored due to steric hindrance from the other substituents on the ring.

To learn more about alkylated here:

https://brainly.com/question/29031148

#SPJ11

From the following formula ΔG°f = ΣnΔG°f(products) - ΣmΔG°f(reactants), the standard free energy of formation of 1.00 mol of CuO(s) is -157.3 kJ.

The standard free energy of formation of 1.00 mol of CuO(s) can be calculated using the equation: ΔG°f = ΣnΔG°f(products) - ΣmΔG°f(reactants)
;where ΔG°f is the standard free energy of formation, n and m are the stoichiometric coefficients of the products and reactants respectively.

The standard free energy of formation of CuO(s) is -157.3 kJ/mol. Therefore, the standard free energy of formation of 1.00 mol of CuO(s) can be calculated as:

ΔG°f = (1 mol) (-157.3 kJ/mol) = -157.3 kJ

So, the standard free energy of formation of 1.00 mol of CuO(s) is -157.3 kJ.

The standard free energy of formation (ΔGf°) of a compound is the change in free energy when 1.00 mol of the substance is formed from its constituent elements under standard conditions (1 atm pressure and 298 K temperature). For CuO(s), this refers to the formation of 1.00 mol of solid copper(II) oxide from its elements, copper (Cu) and oxygen (O₂).

To find the ΔGf° value for CuO(s), you can refer to a table of standard free energies of formation. According to such tables, the ΔGf° for CuO(s) is approximately -129.7 kJ/mol. This negative value indicates that the formation of CuO(s) from its elements is a spontaneous process under standard conditions.

Visit here to learn more about  standard free energy  : https://brainly.com/question/6556762
#SPJ11

Increasing the pressure on the system will shift the equilibrium to the right, favoring the formation of products D and E.

According to Le Chatelier's principle, an increase in pressure will shift the equilibrium towards the side with fewer moles of gas. Since there are fewer moles of gas on the product side, an increase in pressure will favor the forward reaction, producing more D and E. Conversely, decreasing the pressure will shift the equilibrium towards the side with more moles of gas, favoring the reverse reaction. Increasing the concentration of D will not have an effect on the equilibrium because it is a product, and decreasing the concentration of B will also not have an effect because it is a reactant.

learn more about equilibrium here:

https://brainly.com/question/30807709

#SPJ11

To find the specific heat of benzene, we can use the formula: Q = mcΔT where Q is the heat added (3450 J), m is the mass of the benzene sample (150 g).

c is the specific heat capacity we want to find, and ΔT is the temperature increase (35.8°C - 22.5°C). First, let's calculate ΔT: ΔT = 35.8°C - 22.5°C = 13.3°C Now, we can rearrange the formula to find c: c = Q / (mΔT) c = 3450 J / (150 g × 13.3°C) c ≈ 1.73 J/(g°C)

So, the specific heat capacity of benzene is approximately 1.73 J/(g°C). Plugging in the given values: 3450 J = 150 g * c * (35.8°C - 22.5°C) Solving for c: c = 1.74 J/g°C Therefore, the specific heat of benzene is 1.74 J/g°C if 3450 J of heat is added to a 150 g sample of benzene and its temperature increases from 22.5°C to 35.8°C.

To know more about temperature click here

brainly.com/question/29072206

#SPJ11

When 22.0 mL of 0.220 M [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex](aq) is added to (a) 12.0 mL of 0.320 M [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex](aq), we have a reaction between the acid and base: [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex](aq) + [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex](aq) → [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex](aq) + [tex]H_{2}O[/tex](l)

The balanced equation shows that one mole of [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] reacts with one mole of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex] to produce one mole of [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex]and one mole of water. The limiting reagent in this case is [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex], as it is present in smaller amount.

First, we need to calculate the amount of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex]:

0.0120 L × 0.320 mol/L = 0.00384 mol [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex]

Next, we need to calculate the amount of [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] added:

0.0220 L × 0.220 mol/L = 0.00484 mol [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex]

Since [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex]is the limiting reagent, all of it will be consumed in the reaction. Therefore, the amount of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex] that remains after the reaction is: 0.00384 mol - 0.00484 mol = -0.001 mol

The negative result indicates that there is no excess [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex], and that all of it has reacted with the [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex]. The amount of [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex] produced is equal to the amount of [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] added, which is:

0.00484 mol [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex]

The volume of the final solution is the sum of the volumes of the acid and base solutions:

0.0120 L + 0.0220 L = 0.0340 L

The concentration of [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex]is:

0.00484 mol / 0.0340 L = 0.142 M

The pH of a 0.142 M [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex] solution is approximately 7, which means that the resulting solution is neutral.

(b) When 22.0 mL of 0.220 M [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex](aq) is added to 32.0 mL of 0.220 M [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex](aq), we have a similar neutralization reaction:

[tex]H_{Cl}[/tex](aq) + [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex](aq) → [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex](aq) + [tex]H_{2}O[/tex](l)

The balanced equation shows that one mole of [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] reacts with one mole of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex]to produce one mole of [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex] and one mole of water. In this case, both the acid and base solutions have the same concentration, so we need to calculate the amount of each reagent:

Amount of [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] = 0.0220 L × 0.220 mol/L = 0.00484 mol

Amount of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex]= 0.0320 L × 0.220 mol/L = 0.00704 mol

Since the stoichiometry of the reaction is 1:1, the limiting reagent is the one that is present in smaller amount, which is HCl in this case. Therefore, all of the [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] will react with the [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex] , leaving an excess of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex].

The amount of [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex] produced is equal to the amount of [tex]H_{Cl}[/tex] added, which is:

0.00484 mol [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex]

The amount of [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex] that remains after the reaction is:

0.00704 mol - 0.00484 mol = 0.00220 mol

The volume of the final solution is the sum of the volumes of the acid and base solutions:

0.0220 L + 0.0320 L = 0.0540 L

The concentration of [tex]Na_{Cl}[/tex] is:

0.00484 mol / 0.0540 L = 0.090 M

The concentration of excess [tex]Na_{OH}[/tex] is:

0.00220 mol / 0.0540 L = 0

To know more about  pH

brainly.com/question/15289741

#SPJ11

For Situation 1, where the temperature of a gas sample changes at constant pressure, you would use the Combined Gas Law equation:

P₁V₁/T₁ = P₂V₂/T₂

For Situation 2, where the volume of a gas sample is kept constant while the temperature changes, you would use the Gay-Lussac's Law equation:

P₁/T₁ = P₂/T₂

For Situation 3, where the volume of a gas sample changes at constant temperature, you would use Boyle's Law equation:

P₁V₁ = P₂V₂

Note: In all the equations above, P₁, P₂ represent the initial and final pressure respectively, V₁, V₂ represent the initial and final volume respectively, and T₁, T₂ represent the initial and final temperature respectively.

The correct answer is (c) CICH2CO2 is more stable than CH3CO2" because of an additional resonance form.

The acidity of a carboxylic acid depends on the stability of the conjugate base formed when the acid donates a proton. The more stable the conjugate base, the stronger the acid. In this case, the conjugate base of chloroacetic acid, CICH2CO2-, is more stable than the conjugate base of acetic acid, CH3CO2-.

This is due to the presence of an additional resonance form in the conjugate base of chloroacetic acid, which is not present in the conjugate base of acetic acid. The Cl atom in chloroacetic acid withdraws electron density from the carbonyl carbon, making the double bond between the carbon and oxygen stronger. This allows for delocalization of the negative charge over two oxygen atoms and the carbon atom, leading to an additional resonance form.

In contrast, the conjugate base of acetic acid has only one resonance form, where the negative charge is localized on the oxygen atom. Therefore, the conjugate base of chloroacetic acid is more stable than the conjugate base of acetic acid, making chloroacetic acid a stronger acid. The correct answer is (c).

For more such questions on resonance

https://brainly.com/question/11331041

#SPJ11

As per the periodic table, the decreasing electronegativity of the given elements is:

Cl > Br > C > Li > K

Electronegativity is the tendency to attract electrons. In the periodic table, electronegativity increases across the period and decreases down the group.

The halogens (Cl and Br) are present in the second last group, making them the maximum electronegative. And as electronegativity decreases down the group chlorine is more electronegative than bromine.

Carbon is in p-block before halogens and is so lesser electronegative than chlorine and bromine.

Lithium and potassium are present in the first group making them highly electropositive. As electro-positivity increases down the group, potassium is more electropositive and lithium has a more electronegative character than potassium.

To know more about electronegativity, click on the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/17762711

#SPJ11

The Ksp for the silver phosphate at 25°c is (a) 1.09 × 10⁻¹³.

To find the Ksp, we first need to write the balanced dissociation equation and set up an expression for the solubility product:

Ag₃PO₄(s) ↔ 3Ag⁺(aq) + PO₄³⁻(aq)

If the solubility of Ag₃PO₄ is 1.59 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L, then the concentration of Ag⁺ ions will be 3 times that, and the concentration of PO₄³⁻ ions will be equal to the solubility.

[Ag⁺] = 3 × 1.59 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L = 4.77 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L
[PO₄³⁻] = 1.59 × 10⁻⁵ mol/L

Now, we can write the Ksp expression:

Ksp = [Ag⁺]³ × [PO₄³⁻] = (4.77 × 10⁻⁵)³ × (1.59 × 10⁻⁵)

Ksp ≈ 1.09 × 10⁻¹³

So, the correct answer is (a) 1.09 × 10⁻¹³.

Learn more about solubility product here: https://brainly.com/question/29597105

#SPJ11

The initial concentration (molarity) of acetic acid is 0.0462 M. The pH of the solution is 1.75,  the van't Hoff i factor for acetic acid is 2,

The dissociation reaction of acetic acid in water is:

CH₃COOH + H₂O ⇌ CH₃COO- + H₃O+

The equilibrium constant expression for this reaction is:

Ka = [CH₃COO⁻][H₃O⁺]/[CH₃COOH]

Given that acetic acid is 4% dissociated in solution, we can assume that the concentration of acetic acid remaining is 96% of the initial concentration, and the concentration of both acetate and hydronium ions formed is 4% of the initial concentration.

g) What was the initial concentration (molarity) of acetic acid?

Let's assume that the initial concentration of acetic acid is x M. Then, the concentration of acetate and hydronium ions formed is 0.04x M. The concentration of acetic acid remaining is (1-0.04)x M = 0.96x M.

Using the equilibrium constant expression, we can write:

Ka = [CH₃COO⁻][H3O⁺]/[CH₃COOH]

Ka = (0.04x)(0.04x)/(0.96x)

Ka = 0.00176

We know that the equilibrium constant expression for a weak acid can be written as Ka = [H3O⁺][A-]/[HA]. In this case, HA represents acetic acid and A- represents acetate ion. Since the concentration of acetate and hydronium ions formed is 0.04x M, and assuming that they are equal due to the 1:1 stoichiometry of the dissociation reaction, we can write:

Ka = [H3O⁺][CH₃COO⁻]/[CH₃COOH]

0.00176 = (0.04x)/(0.96x)

x = 0.0462 M

Therefore, the initial concentration (molarity) of acetic acid is 0.0462 M.

h) What is the pH?

The concentration of hydronium ions formed in the solution can be calculated using the equation:

[H3O⁺] = Ka[CH₃COOH]/[CH₃COO⁻]

[H3O⁺] = (0.00176)(0.0462)/(0.00462)

[H3O⁺] = 0.0177 M

The pH of the solution can be calculated using the equation:

pH = -log[H3O⁺]

pH = -log(0.0177)

pH = 1.75

Therefore, the pH of the solution is 1.75.

i) What is the van't Hoff i factor?

The van't Hoff i factor represents the number of particles that are formed when a solute dissolves in a solvent. In this case, acetic acid is a weak acid, which means that it partially dissociates in water to form acetate and hydronium ions. Therefore, the van't Hoff i factor for acetic acid is 2, since 2 particles are formed when it dissolves in water (one molecule of acetic acid and one hydronium ion).

Know more about molarity here: https://brainly.com/question/2817451

#SPJ4

The reactant for adding a carbon group to biotin is usually a biotin carboxylase enzyme, which uses ATP and bicarbonate as co-factors to add a carboxyl group to the biotin molecule. This process is known as biotinylation and is an essential step in the activation of certain enzymes involved in various metabolic pathways.

Biotin, also known as vitamin B7 or vitamin H, is a water-soluble vitamin that is important for various metabolic processes in the body. It is involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, and plays a key role in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails. Biotin is also essential for the normal functioning of the nervous system and is sometimes used as a dietary supplement to help improve the health of hair, skin, and nails. Biotin is found in a variety of foods, including egg yolks, liver, nuts, and whole grains.

Visit here to learn more about biotin brainly.com/question/8906658

#SPJ11

To identify the structural features as either similarities or differences between a triacylglycerol and a phosphatidylserine.

1. Esterified phosphoric acid moiety: This is a structural difference between a triacylglycerol and a phosphatidylserine. Triacylglycerols do not have a phosphoric acid moiety, while phosphatidylserines do.

2. Two ester linkages formed between glycerol and carboxylic acids: This is a structural similarity between a triacylglycerol and a phosphatidylserine. Both molecules have ester linkages between the glycerol backbone and carboxylic acids (fatty acids in triacylglycerols and fatty acids + phosphoric acid in phosphatidylserines).

3. The structure contains one glycerol unit: This is also a structural similarity between a triacylglycerol and a phosphatidylserine. Both molecules have a glycerol backbone as a structural component.

In summary, the esterified phosphoric acid moiety is a structural difference, while the presence of two ester linkages formed between glycerol and carboxylic acids, and the presence of one glycerol unit are both structural similarities between a triacylglycerol and a phosphatidylserine.

To know more about triacylglycerol :

https://brainly.com/question/13020914

#SPJ11

In a carbocation rearrangement, a positively charged carbon atom (carbocation) shifts its position to a neighboring carbon atom, creating a new carbocation with a more stable structure.

This process occurs via the movement of electrons, which is represented using curved arrow notation.
To draw the missing curved arrow notation for the carbocation rearrangement, you would need to indicate the movement of the electron pair from the carbon-carbon bond to the adjacent carbon atom, leading to the formation of a new carbon-carbon bond and a more stable carbocation. The exact placement and direction of the curved arrow depend on the specific reaction mechanism and the structure of the starting and final carbocations.

To learn more about carbocation click here https://brainly.com/question/13164680

#SPJ11

The nitrogen atom in methylamine (CH3NH2) is sp3 hybridized.

To draw the complete Lewis structure, we start by counting the total number of valence electrons in the molecule. Therefore, the total number of valence electrons in the molecule is:

4 + 3(1) + 5 = 12

We then arrange the atoms in the molecule so that the nitrogen atom is in the center, with the three hydrogen atoms and one carbon atom bonded to it. The Lewis structure for methylamine is:

           H

     . .    |

H - N - C - H

      |     |

     H   H

To determine the hybridization of the nitrogen atom, we count the number of regions of electron density around the atom, which includes both the lone pair and the bonds to the hydrogen and carbon atoms. In this case, there are four regions of electron density around the nitrogen atom, which corresponds to sp3 hybridization.

learn more about hybridization,

https://brainly.com/question/22765530

#SPJ11

The amount of hydrogen gas that evolved in the reaction of Cu⁺ with HCl is less than the amount of hydrogen gas that evolved in the reaction of Cu₂⁺ with HCl.

When the Copper (I) ion (Cu⁺) reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCl), it undergoes a single replacement reaction, as follows:

Cu⁺ (aq) + HCl (aq) → CuCl (aq) + H⁺ (aq)

In this reaction, copper (I) ion is oxidized to copper (II) ion (Cu₂⁺) while hydrogen ion (H⁺) is reduced to hydrogen gas (H₂).

The reaction of Copper (II) ion (Cu₂⁺) with hydrochloric acid (HCl) also undergoes a single replacement reaction, as follows:

Cu₂⁺ (aq) + 2HCl (aq) → CuCl₂ (aq) + 2H⁺ (aq)

In this reaction, copper (II) ion is reduced to copper (I) ion (Cu⁺) while hydrogen ion (H⁺) is again reduced to hydrogen gas (H₂).

The second reaction produces twice the amount of hydrogen gas compared to the first reaction.

To learn more about hydrogen follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/31018544

#SPJ1

The pH of the potassium hydrogen phthalate buffer before the addition of a base or an acid is equal to its pKa, which is 5.51.

To calculate the pH of the potassium hydrogen phthalate buffer before the addition of a base or an acid, you'll need to consider the molarity of the buffer solution and the pKa of potassium hydrogen phthalate. The pKa value for potassium hydrogen phthalate is 5.51. We can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to determine the pH of the buffer:

pH = pKa + log ([A-]/[HA])
Given that the buffer is not yet titrated with any acid or base, the ratio of [A-]/[HA] is 1. Therefore, the equation becomes: pH = pKa + log (1)

Since the log (1) is 0, the equation simplifies to:
pH = pKa = 5.51

To know more about Henderson-Hasselbach Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/22278201

#SPJ11

The number of mole of copper present in the copper sample shown in the diagram is 1.5 mole (option A)

We can obtain the number of mole of copper present in sample as follow:

Mole is defined as:

Mole = mass / molar mass

Inputting the mass and molar mass of copper, we have:

Mole of copper = 95.33 / 63.55

Mole of Copper = 1.5 mole

Thus, we can conclude that the number of mole of copper is 1.5 mole (option A)

Learn more about mole:

https://brainly.com/question/13314627

#SPJ1

Titrating too much NaOH into the flask would cause the normality of the solution to decrease due to the increase in volume without a corresponding increase in the number of equivalents (moles of OH-) being added.

To explain this reasoning, let's consider the following steps:

1. When titrating NaOH into the flask, you are adding more moles of hydroxide ions (OH-) to the solution.
2. As you add more NaOH, the concentration of the hydroxide ions in the solution will increase.
3. Normality is defined as the number of equivalents of solute per liter of solution (N = equivalents/L).
4. In this case, an "equivalent" refers to the number of moles of hydroxide ions (OH-).
5. As you continue to add NaOH beyond the equivalence point, the volume of the solution in the flask will also increase.
6. Because normality takes both the number of equivalents (moles of OH-) and the volume of the solution into account, increasing the volume without adding more equivalents of the solute will result in a lower normality.

To know more about "Titrating" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29358403#

#SPJ11

The de Broglie wavelength of the beta particle is approximately  2.69 x 10^-15 m.

To find the de Broglie wavelength of the beta particle, we need to use the formula:

λ = h / p

where λ is the wavelength, h is the Planck's constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J s), and p is the momentum of the particle. We can find the momentum of the beta particle using the formula:

p = m * v

where m is the mass of the particle and v is its velocity. Plugging in the given values, we get:

p = (9.109 x 10^-28 g) * (2.70 x 10^8 m/s)
p = 2.46 x 10^-19 kg m/s

Now we can calculate the wavelength:

λ = (6.626 x 10^-34 J s) / (2.46 x 10^-19 kg m/s)
λ = 2.69 x 10^-15 m

Therefore, the de Broglie wavelength of the beta particle is 2.69 x 10^-15 m.

Learn more about wavelength here:

https://brainly.com/question/13533093

#SPJ11

Answer:

Empirical formula:CH2O

Molecular formula:C2H4O2

Explanation: For empirical formula: Find mass to mole ratio

so we divide each of th c,h,o respective mass with their molar mass giving us the ratio of approximately 0.3:0.6:0.3

which simplifies to 1:2:1 giving us CH2O

To find the molecular formula:

We find the molar mass of empirical formula which is 30 (half the molecular mass) so we multiply the empirical formula by 2 giving us C2H4O2

Hydrazoic acid ([tex]HN_{3}[/tex]) is a weak acid with a Ka value of 1.8 x [tex]10^{-5}[/tex] When it reacts with NaOH, it undergoes a neutralization reaction, producing water and sodium azide ([tex]NaN_{3}[/tex]). The balanced equation for the reaction is:

[tex]HN_{3} (aq) + NaOH(aq)[/tex] → [tex]NaN_{3} (aq) + H_{2} O(l)[/tex]

To determine the pH after adding 10.18 mL of 0.211 M NaOH to a 25.0 mL sample of 0.150 M [tex]HN_{3}[/tex], we can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, which relates the pH to the acid dissociation constant (Ka) and the ratio of the concentrations of the acid and its conjugate base.

First, we need to calculate the initial concentration of [tex]HN_{3}[/tex] in the 25.0 mL sample:

0.150 M × 0.0250 L = 0.00375 mol [tex]HN_{3}[/tex]

Next, we need to calculate the number of moles of NaOH added to the solution:

0.211 M × 0.01018 L = 0.00215 mol NaOH

Since NaOH and [tex]HN_{3}[/tex] react in a 1:1 ratio, the number of moles of [tex]HN_{3}[/tex] that remain after the neutralization reaction is:

0.00375 mol - 0.00215 mol = 0.00160 mol [tex]HN_{3}[/tex]

The volume of the resulting solution is 25.0 mL + 10.18 mL = 35.18 mL.

Now we can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

pH = pKa + log([[tex]A^{-}[/tex]]/[HA])

where [[tex]A^{-}[/tex]] is the concentration of the conjugate base ([tex]NaN_{3}[/tex]) and [HA] is the concentration of the weak acid ([tex]HN_{3}[/tex]).

At the equivalence point of the titration, all of the [tex]HN_{3}[/tex] has reacted with the NaOH to form [tex]NaN_{3}[/tex], so the concentration of the conjugate base is:

[[tex]A^{-}[/tex]] = (0.00215 mol NaOH / 0.03518 L) = 0.0612 M

The concentration of the weak acid remaining after the titration is:

[HA] = (0.00160 mol [tex]HN_{3}[/tex] / 0.03518 L) = 0.0455 M

The pKa of [tex]HN_{3}[/tex] is given as 1.8 x [tex]10^-5[/tex]. Converting this to Ka gives:

Ka = [tex]10^-pKa[/tex] = 5.56 x [tex]10^{-6}[/tex]

Substituting these values into the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation gives:

pH = 4.25 + log(0.0612/0.0455) ≈ 9.13

Therefore, the pH of the solution after adding 10.18 mL of NaOH is approximately 9.13.

Learn more about Hydrazoic acid

https://brainly.com/question/13770854

#SPJ4

all four elements (A, B, C, and D) have 2 unpaired electrons in their ground state

To determine how many of the following elements have 2 unpaired electrons in the ground state, let's examine the electron configurations for each element: A. C (Carbon), B. Te (Tellurium), C. Hf (Hafnium), and D. Si (Silicon).

A. Carbon (C) has an electron configuration of 1s² 2s² 2p². In the 2p subshell, there are two unpaired electrons.

B. Tellurium (Te) has an electron configuration of 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶ 4s² 3d¹⁰ 4p⁶ 5s² 4d¹⁰ 5p⁴. In the 5p subshell, there are two unpaired electrons.

C. Hafnium (Hf) has an electron configuration of 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p⁶ 4s² 3d¹⁰ 4p⁶ 5s² 4d¹⁰ 5p⁶ 6s² 4f¹⁴ 5d². In the 5d subshell, there are two unpaired electrons.

D. Silicon (Si) has an electron configuration of 1s² 2s² 2p⁶ 3s² 3p². In the 3p subshell, there are two unpaired electrons.

So, all four elements (A, B, C, and D) have 2 unpaired electrons in their ground state.

Learn more about  unpaired electrons

brainly.com/question/30985234

#SPJ11

To prepare a buffer of pH 4, we need to use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

pH = pKa + log([A^-]/[HA])

We can assume that acetic acid (HA) will be the major species in solution and the acetate ion (A^-) will be the minor species.

pH = 4

pKa of acetic acid = 4.76

Substituting these values into the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, we get:

4 = 4.76 + log([A^-]/[HA])

log([A^-]/[HA]) = -0.76

[A^-]/[HA] = 10^(-0.76)

[A^-]/[HA] = 0.184

Since we know the concentration of acetic acid is 1.0 M, we can find the concentration of the acetate ion by multiplying the concentration of acetic acid by the ratio [A^-]/[HA]:

0.184 = [A^-]/1.0

[A^-] = 0.184 M

Now, we can use the equation for the dissociation of sodium acetate:

NaC2H3O2(aq) ↔ Na+(aq) + C2H3O2^-(aq)

The equilibrium constant for this reaction is:

K = [Na+(aq)][C2H3O2^-(aq)]/[NaC2H3O2(aq)]

Since the sodium acetate is a strong electrolyte, it will dissociate completely, so we can assume that the concentration of NaC2H3O2(aq) is equal to the concentration of sodium acetate added. Therefore, we can simplify the equilibrium constant expression to:

K = [Na+][C2H3O2^-]

We can find the concentration of sodium ion by multiplying the concentration of acetate ion by the ratio of sodium ion to acetate ion, which is 1:1 since the compound is NaC2H3O2:

[Na+] = [C2H3O2^-] = 0.184 M

We can look up the value of the equilibrium constant for this reaction (K = 1.8 x 10^-5), so we can solve for the concentration of NaC2H3O2:

1.8 x 10^-5 = (0.184 M)^2/[NaC2H3O2]

[NaC2H3O2] = 0.184^2/1.8 x 10^-5

[NaC2H3O2] = 1.89 M

Now, we can use the formula for calculating the amount (in moles) of a compound needed to make a solution:

moles = concentration x volume (in liters)

We have a volume of 50.0 mL = 0.0500 L and a concentration of 1.89 M, so:

moles of NaC2H3O2 = 1.89 M x 0.0500 L = 0.0945 moles

Finally, we can use the molar mass of NaC2H3O2·3H2O to convert moles to mass:

mass = moles x molar mass

The molar mass of NaC2H3O2·3H2O is:

Na: 1 x 22.99 g/mol = 22.99 g/mol

C: 2 x 12.01 g/mol = 24.02 g/mol

H: 6 x 1.01 g/mol = 6.06 g/mol

O: 7 x 16.00 g

Visit here to learn more about Henderson-Hasselbalch brainly.com/question/13423434

#SPJ11

The decay of 83^214 Bi to 82^214 Pb occurs through the emission of a beta particle.

The decay of 83^214 Bi (Bismuth-214) to 82^214 Pb (Lead-214) occurs through the emission of a beta particle.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Identify the initial nuclide: 83^214 Bi (Bismuth-214), where 83 is the atomic number (protons) and 214 is the mass number (protons + neutrons).

2. Identify the final nuclide: 82^214 Pb (Lead-214), where 82 is the atomic number and 214 is the mass number.

3. Observe the change in atomic number: The atomic number decreases by 1 (from 83 to 82), which indicates that a beta particle (electron) is emitted.

4. Confirm that the mass number remains the same (214) as it does not change during beta decay.

To know more about radioactive decay, click below.

https://brainly.com/question/20388835

#SPJ11

Consider a buffer made by adding 44.9 g of (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH[tex]_2[/tex]I to 250.0 ml of 1.42 m (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH. 10.29 is the pH of this buffer.

pH is a numerical indicator of how acidic or basic aqueous or other liquid solutions are. The phrase, which is frequently used in chemistry, biology, and agronomy, converts the hydrogen ion concentration, which typically ranges between 1 and 1014 gram-equivalents per litre, into numbers between 0 and 14. The hydrogen ion concentration in pure water, which has a pH of 7, is 107 gram-equivalents per litre, making it neutral (neither acidic nor alkaline). A solution with a pH below 7 is referred to as acidic, and one with a pH over 7 is referred to as basic, or alkaline.

moles of  (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH = 1.42 mol/L x 0.250 L

                                 = 0.355 mol

(CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH[tex]_2[/tex]I →  (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH[tex]_2[/tex]⁺ + I⁻

Kb = [  (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH[tex]_2[/tex]⁺ ][OH⁻] / [ (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH  ]

[ (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH[tex]_2[/tex]⁺ ] = Kb x [ (CH₂)₂NH ]

                      = (5.4 x 10⁻⁴) x 0.355 mol

                      = 1.92 x 10⁻⁴ M

[  (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH ] =(CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH +  (CH[tex]_2[/tex])[tex]_2[/tex]NH[tex]_2[/tex]⁺

                    = 0.355 mol + 1.92 x 10⁻⁴ mol

                    = 0.3552 mol

Kb = Kw / Ka

Ka = Kw / Kb

   = 1.0 x 10⁻¹⁴ / 5.4 x 10⁻⁴

   = 1.85 x 10⁻¹¹

pKa = -log(Ka)

      = -log(1.85 x 10⁻¹¹)

      = 10.73

pH = pKa + log( [ (CH₃)₂NH₂⁺ ] / [ (CH₂)₂NH ] )

pH = 10.73 + log(1.92 x 10⁻⁴ M / 0.3552 M)

    = 10.29

To know more about pH, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2288405

#SPJ12

pH of the solution is 2.982

HClO₃ is a strong acid and dissociates completely in water, which means that all the HClO₃ molecules will ionize to form H⁺ ions and ClO₃⁻ ions. The balanced chemical equation for the dissociation of HClO₃ is:

HClO₃ + H₂O → H₃O+ + ClO₃⁻

To calculate the pH of the solution, we need to know the concentration of H⁺ ions in the solution, which we can calculate from the amount of HClO and the volume of the solution.

First, we need to convert the mass of HClO₃ to moles:

moles HClO₃ = mass / molar mass

moles HClO₃ = 0.220 g / 84.46 g/mol

moles HClO₃ = 0.002605 mol

Next, we need to calculate the concentration of H⁺ ions in the solution:

[H+] = moles HClO₃ / volume of solution

[H+] = 0.002605 mol / 2.50 L

[H+] = 0.001042 M

Finally, we can calculate the pH of the solution using the formula:

pH = -log[H⁺]

pH = -log(0.001042)

pH = 2.982

Therefore, the pH of the solution of 0.220 g of HClO₃ in 2.50 L of solution is 2.982.

To know more about pH here:
https://brainly.com/question/491373#

#SPJ11

a. Metals can react with water to form metal hydroxide and hydrogen gas.

b. Within a family, the reactivity of metals with water increases as you move down the group.

c. Within the same period, the reactivity of metals with water generally decreases as you move from left to right.

d. As for the relative reactivities of cesium and lithium with water, cesium is more reactive than lithium due to its larger size and lower ionization energy.

e. The reactivities of Groups IIA and IIIA with dilute acids are also different.

The reactivity of a metal with water depends on its position in the periodic table. Metals in Group IA (alkali metals) are highly reactive with water, while metals in Group IIA (alkaline earth metals) are less reactive. Metals in Group IIIA have a lower reactivity with water than metals in Group IA and IIA.

The reactivity of metals with water increases as you move down the group. For example, lithium reacts slowly with water, while cesium reacts explosively with water. This trend is due to the increasing size of the atoms and the decreasing ionization energy as you move down the group.

The reactivity of metals with water generally decreases as you move from left to right. For example, sodium reacts more vigorously with water than magnesium. This trend is due to the increasing electronegativity of the elements as you move from left to right, making it harder for the metal atom to lose electrons and form positive ions.

Metals in Group IIA react with dilute acids to form a metal salt and hydrogen gas, while metals in Group IIIA do not react with dilute acids. This is because Group IIA metals have a lower ionization energy and are more likely to form positive ions in solution, while Group IIIA metals have a higher ionization energy and are less likely to form positive ions.

Learn more about reactivities: https://brainly.com/question/30843855

#SPJ11

The ΔH for the given reaction is -227 kJ. The standard enthalpy of formation is the change in enthalpy when one mole of a substance is formed from its elements in their standard states under standard conditions.

To do this, we'll use the following formula:
ΔH_reaction = Σ ΔH_f(products) - Σ ΔH_f(reactants)

First, let's find the ΔH_f values for all the compounds involved in the reaction:

NO = 90 kJ/mol
NO2 = 34 kJ/mol
CO = -111 kJ/mol
CO2 = -394 kJ/mol

Now, plug these values into the formula:

ΔH_reaction = [(ΔH_f(CO2) + ΔH_f(NO)) - (ΔH_f(NO2) + ΔH_f(CO))]

ΔH_reaction = [(-394 kJ/mol + 90 kJ/mol) - (34 kJ/mol - 111 kJ/mol)]

Now, perform the calculations inside the brackets:

ΔH_reaction = [(-304 kJ/mol) - (-77 kJ/mol)]

Lastly, subtract the values:

ΔH_reaction = -227 kJ/mol

Therefore, the ΔH for the given reaction is -227 kJ.

To learn more about standard enthalpy please visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29556033

#SPJ11

A total of 18 moles of electrons are transferred when 1 mole of potassium dichromate is mixed with 3 moles of nickel.

The balanced chemical equation for the given reaction is:

14H+ (aq) + Cr2O7 2- (aq) + 3Ni (s) → 2Cr3+ (aq) + 3Ni2+ (aq) + 7H2O (l)

From the equation, we can see that 6 moles of electrons are transferred per mole of Ni (s). Therefore, when 3 moles of nickel react, 18 moles of electrons are transferred.

To determine the number of moles of electrons transferred when 1 mole of potassium dichromate is mixed with 3 moles of nickel, we need to first calculate the limiting reactant. The balanced equation shows that 3 moles of nickel require 1 mole of potassium dichromate to react completely. Therefore, 1 mole of potassium dichromate will react with 3 moles of nickel.

As we know that 18 moles of electrons are transferred when 3 moles of nickel react, we can conclude that 6 moles of electrons are transferred when 1 mole of nickel reacts. Therefore, when 1 mole of potassium dichromate is mixed with 3 moles of nickel, a total of 6 x 3 = 18 moles of electrons are transferred.

In summary, 18 moles of electrons are transferred when 1 mole of potassium dichromate is mixed with 3 moles of nickel.

for more such question on moles

https://brainly.com/question/28037816

#SPJ11