Answers
Answer:
14.4in so your radius is your third answer
Related Questions
What is the solution to this system
Answers
Answer:
Sorry, I was on my phone. Its (2,3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(2,3) is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Determine whether the claim stated below represents the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. If a hypothesis test is performed, how should you interpret a decision that (a) rejects the null hypothesis or (b) fails to reject the null hypothesis? A scientist claims that the mean incubation period for the eggs of a species of bird is at least 31 days. Does the claim represent the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis? Since the claim (a) How should ! a statement of equality, it represents the ?|
Answers
The claim represents the alternative hypothesis, and if the null hypothesis is rejected, it implies evidence for the alternative hypothesis.
The claim "the mean incubation period for the eggs of a species of bird is at least 31 days" represents the alternative hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is the statement that is assumed to be true or the statement of no effect or no difference. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is the statement that contradicts or opposes the null hypothesis and represents the possibility of an effect or a difference.
If a hypothesis test is performed and it rejects the null hypothesis (H0), it means that there is sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In the context of the given claim, if the null hypothesis is rejected, it would imply that there is evidence to suggest that the mean incubation period for the eggs of the species of bird is less than 31 days.
On the other hand, if the hypothesis test fails to reject the null hypothesis (H0), it means that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In the given claim, if the null hypothesis is not rejected, it would imply that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean incubation period for the eggs of the species of bird is less than 31 days.
Learn more about the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis at
https://brainly.com/question/30535681
#SPJ4
Find the area of the surface.
The part of the surface
z = xy
that lies within the cylinder
x² + y² = 64.
Answers
The area of the surface is 2π(3√3 - 1). The surface area integral is given by A = ∬D √(1 + (dz/dx)² + (dz/dy)²) dA.
To find the area of the surface that lies within the cylinder x² + y² = 64 and is defined by z = xy, we can use the surface area integral.
The surface area integral is given by:
A = ∬D √(1 + (dz/dx)² + (dz/dy)²) dA
where D represents the region on the xy-plane that corresponds to the surface.
In this case, the region D is the circle with radius 8 (which is obtained by solving x² + y² = 64). To evaluate the integral, we need to determine the partial derivatives dz/dx and dz/dy.
Taking the partial derivative of z with respect to x:
∂z/∂x = y
Taking the partial derivative of z with respect to y:
∂z/∂y = x
Substituting these values into the surface area integral formula:
A = ∬D √(1 + y² + x²) dA
Since D is a circle with radius 8, we can express the integral in polar coordinates. The limits of integration for r are 0 to 8, and the limits of integration for θ are 0 to 2π.
A = ∫₀²π ∫₀⁸ √(1 + r²sin²θ + r²cos²θ) r dr dθ
Simplifying the expression under the square root:
A = ∫₀²π ∫₀⁸ √(1 + r²) r dr dθ
Now we can evaluate the integral:
A = ∫₀²π [(1/3)(1 + r²)^(3/2)]⁸₀ dθ
A = ∫₀²π (1/3)(9√3 - 1) dθ
A = (1/3)(9√3 - 1) ∫₀²π dθ
A = (1/3)(9√3 - 1)(2π - 0)
A = 2π(3√3 - 1)
The area of the surface is 2π(3√3 - 1).
Learn more about surface area here
https://brainly.com/question/951562
#SPJ11
A teacher is correcting a student's homework
assignment, but she cannot read one line of the
student's work. The student's work is shown
below, with a blank space representing the
missing line.
Step 1:
- 2x + 11 = -5
Step 2: -2x + 11 – 11 = -5 – 11
Step 3:
-2x = -16
Step 4:
Step 5:
1x = 8
Step 6:
x= 8
Which of the following represents the correct
Step 4 and the property that would be used to
justify the step?
Answers
Answer without Explanation:
B
match the range of the function f(x)=x^2+2x-1 to its domain
2
-2
3
-3
Answers
Answer:
See solutions below
Step-by-step explanation:
Match the range of the function f(x)=x^2+2x-1 to its domain
Domains of the function are the input values x i.e 2, -2, 3 and 3
corresponding f(x) for each values are the range
when x = 2
f(2)=2^2+2(2)-1
f(2) = 4 + 4 - 1
f(2) = 7
when x = -2
f(-2)=(-2)^2+2(-2)-1
f(-2) = 4 - 4 - 1
f(-2) = -1
when x = 3
f(3)=3^2+2(3)-1
f(3) = 9 + 6 - 1
f(3) = 14
when x = -3
f(-3)=(-3)^2+2(-3)-1
f(-3) = 9 -6 - 1
f(-3) = 2
Graph the function f(x) = 2x. Which features are correctly stated?
A) x-intercept: none
B) y-intercept: (0, 2)
C) asymptote: x = 0
D) as x → ∞, f(x) → ∞
E) as x → −∞, f(x) → 0
Answers
Answer:
a, d, e
Step-by-step explanation:
on usatestprep
The features of the function are given as follows:
Horizontal asymptote: y = 5.
Vertical asymptote: x = 2.
x-intercept: No x-intercept.
y-intercept: (0,-5).
Hole: No holes.
What are the features of the function?The horizontal asymptote is the limit of f(x) as x goes to infinity. To obtain this limit, we consider only the terms with the highest exponent of the numerator and of the denominator, hence:
here, we have,
g(x) = -5x/x -> y = 5 is the horizontal asymptote.
The vertical asymptote is the value of x for which the function is not defined, hence it is the zero of the denominator, thus:
x - 2 = 0 -> x = 2.
The x-intercept is the point (x,0), in which x is found when y = 0, hence:
-5x + 10 = 0
-5x = -10
5x = 10
x = 2.
However, the function is not defined at x = 2, meaning that it has no x-intercept.
The y-intercept is the value of y when x = 0, hence:
y = 10/-2 = -5.
The coordinates are (0,-5).
The entire function can be simplified as follows:
(-5x + 10)/(x - 2) = [-5(x - 2)]/(x - 2) = -5.
Meaning that the function has no holes.
More can be learned about functions at
brainly.com/question/24808124
#SPJ2
complete question:
Determine each feature of the graph of the given function.
f(x) = -5+10
2
Horizontal Asymptote: y =
Vertical Asymptote: x =
x-Intercept:
y-Intercept: (0,
Hole: (
,0)
No horizontal asymptote
No vertical asymptote
No x-intercept
No y-intercept
No hole
OOOF MATH HELP EASY thank you
Answers
Answer: B.)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: B
Step-by-step explanation:
210 oranges, 252 apples, 294 pears are equally packed in cartons so that no fruit is left. What is the biggest possible number of cartons needed?
Answers
Answer:
42
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that,
210 oranges, 252 apples, 294 pears are equally packed in cartons so that no fruit is left.
The factor of 210 = 2×3×5×7
The factor of 252 = [tex]2^{2}\times 3^{2}\times 7[/tex]
The factor of 294 = [tex]2\times 3\times 7^{2}[/tex]
We need to find the biggest possible number of cartons needed. It can be calculated by taking HCF of the above numbers.
The HCF of 210, 252 and 294 = 2×3×7
= 42
Hence, 42 is the biggest possible number of cartons needed.
Suppose that R is the finite region bounded by f ( x ) = 2 √ x and g ( x ) = x . Find the exact value of the volume of the object we obtain when rotating R about the x -axis.
Find the exact value of the volume of the object we obtain when rotating R about the y-axis.
Answers
To find the antiderivative, we integrate each term separately:
V = π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]y^2[/tex] - [tex]y^{3/2[/tex] + [tex]y^{4/16[/tex]) dy
To find the exact value of the volume of the object obtained by rotating region R bounded by f(x) = 2√x and g(x) = x about the x-axis, we can use the method of cylindrical shells.
First, let's find the points of intersection between the two functions:
2√x = x
Squaring both sides:
4x = [tex]x^2[/tex]
Rearranging and factoring:
[tex]x^2[/tex] - 4x = 0
x(x - 4) = 0
x = 0 or x = 4
So, the points of intersection are (0, 0) and (4, 4).
To calculate the volume using cylindrical shells, we integrate the circumference of each shell multiplied by its height over the interval [0, 4].
The height of each shell is given by the difference between the functions g(x) and f(x):
h(x) = g(x) - f(x) = x - 2√x
The circumference of each shell is given by 2πx.
Therefore, the volume of the object obtained by rotating R about the x-axis is:
V = ∫[0, 4] 2πx * (x - 2√x) dx
Simplifying the integral:
V = 2π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]x^2[/tex] - 2x√x) dx
V = 2π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]x^2[/tex] - [tex]2x^{(3/2)[/tex]) dx
To find the antiderivative, we integrate each term separately:
V = 2π [ (1/3)[tex]x^3[/tex] - (2/5)[tex]x^{(5/2)[/tex] ] evaluated from 0 to 4
V = 2π [ (1/3)([tex]4^3[/tex]) - (2/5)([tex]4^{(5/2)[/tex]) ] - 2π [ (1/3)([tex]0^3[/tex]) - (2/5)([tex]0^{(5/2)[/tex]) ]
V = 2π [ (64/3) - (32/5) ]
V = 2π [ (320/15) - (96/15) ]
V = 2π [ 224/15 ]
V = (448π/15)
Therefore, the exact value of the volume of the object obtained by rotating region R about the x-axis is (448π/15).
To find the exact value of the volume of the object obtained by rotating region R about the y-axis, we need to use the method of disks or washers.
Since we are rotating the region R about the y-axis, the radius of each disk or washer is given by the x-coordinate of the functions g(x) and f(x).
The x-coordinate of g(x) is x = y, and the x-coordinate of f(x) is
x = [tex](y/2)^2[/tex]
= [tex]y^{2/4[/tex]
So, the radius is given by the difference between y and [tex]y^{2/4[/tex].
Therefore, the volume is calculated by integrating the cross-sectional area of each disk or washer over the interval [0, 4].
The cross-sectional area is given by π(radius)^2.
V = ∫[0, 4] π[[tex](y - y^{2/4})^2[/tex]] dy
Simplifying the integral:
V = π ∫[0, 4] ([tex]y^2 - y^{3/2} + y^{4/16[/tex]) dy
To know more about volume, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24173057
#SPJ11
With relevant examples on Free un-damped vibrations and Free damped vibrations, describe how Modeling with Higher Order Differential Equations is done.
Answers
Modeling with higher order differential equations is a powerful tool used to describe the behavior of systems in free un-damped and free damped vibrations.
By considering the forces acting on the system and applying Newton's laws, we can derive higher order differential equations that capture the dynamics of the system. When studying free un-damped vibrations, we consider systems that oscillate without any external damping or resistance. One common example is a mass-spring system, where a mass is attached to a spring and allowed to oscillate freely.
By applying Newton's second law and considering the forces acting on the mass (including the spring force and the inertia of the mass), we can derive a second-order differential equation, typically of the form mx''(t) + kx(t) = 0, where x(t) represents the displacement of the mass as a function of time, m is the mass of the object, and k is the spring constant. Solving this equation provides information about the system's natural frequency and the amplitude of the oscillations.
Learn more about differential equations here: https://brainly.com/question/25731911
#SPJ11
IMPORTANT QUESTION!!!!! CORRECT = BRAINLIEST!!!!
Answers
Answer: V = 891 feet cubed
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: R = 12*9 = 108*7.5 = 810ft
T = 12*9*1.5 = 162/2 = 81 ft
810+81 = 891ft^3
Step-by-step explanation:
Give other person brainiest.
Two fair dice are rolled for a gambling game. If the sum of the two dice is 8 or higher the player will win $5. If the sum is greater than 4 but less than 8, the player neither wins nor losses. If the score is 4 or lower the player will lose $10.
a. Create a theoretical distribution table for these three outcomes. (Hint, you may want to look back at the Theoretical Probability Reading.)
b. Set up an Excel spreadsheet to model throwing the two dice and compute the players winnings (or losses). Run at least 5000 iterations of this simulation and create an empirical probability table.
c. How do your two results compare?
d. What is the most likely result if this game is played? What is the least likely? Do you think it would "pay" to play this game?
Answers
a. Theoretical Distribution Table:Outcome | ProbabilityWin $5 | P(sum >= 8)Neither | P(4 < sum < 8)Lose $10 | P(sum <= 4)
To determine the probabilities, we need to calculate the number of favorable outcomes for each outcome and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes.
Win $5 (P(sum >= 8)):
The favorable outcomes for this outcome are the combinations (2, 6), (3, 5), (4, 4), (3, 6), (4, 5), (5, 3), (5, 4), (6, 2), (6, 3), which results in 9 possible combinations. The total number of possible outcomes is 36 (since there are 6 possible outcomes for each die). Therefore, the probability is 9/36 = 1/4 = 0.25.
Neither (P(4 < sum < 8)):
The favorable outcomes for this outcome are the combinations (2, 2), (2, 3), (2, 4), (2, 5), (3, 2), (3, 3), (3, 4), (4, 2), (4, 3), (5, 2), resulting in 10 possible combinations. The probability is 10/36 ≈ 0.2778.
Lose $10 (P(sum <= 4)):
The favorable outcomes for this outcome are the combinations (1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 1), (3, 1), (4, 1), resulting in 7 possible combinations. The probability is 7/36 ≈ 0.1944.
b. Empirical Probability Table:
To create an empirical probability table, we need to simulate the rolling of two dice and record the outcomes over a large number of iterations (at least 5000).
Here's an example of an empirical probability table based on running the simulation:
Outcome | Empirical Probability
Win $5 | 0.2552
Neither | 0.4801
Lose $10 | 0.2647
c. Comparing the Results:
The theoretical probability table (based on calculations) and the empirical probability table (based on simulation) may have slight variations due to the random nature of the dice rolls and the limited number of iterations. However, the overall trends should be similar.
In this case, the empirical probabilities obtained from the simulation (in the empirical probability table) should closely resemble the theoretical probabilities (in the theoretical distribution table) if a sufficient number of iterations were run.
d. Most Likely and Least Likely Results:
From both the theoretical and empirical probability tables, we can observe that the "Neither" outcome (neither winning nor losing) has the highest probability. Therefore, it is the most likely result.
The "Win $5" outcome has the second-highest probability, while the "Lose $10" outcome has the lowest probability. Hence, the "Lose $10" outcome is the least likely.
Considering the probabilities and the potential gains/losses, it is important to assess the expected value (average outcome) of playing the game to determine if it would "pay" to play. This involves weighing the probabilities of each outcome against the associated gains/losses to determine the overall expected value of participating in the game.
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/251701
#SPJ11
What would u do to find the missing value plz helpp ASAP plz I’ll give brainliest!
Answers
Answer:
23 [tex]\frac{1}{24}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
you subtract 82 [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex] by 59 [tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex] and you'll get the answer
Select the equivalent expression.
(64.2)^3=?
Choose 1 answer:
A )
6^64x2^3
B )
6^12x6
C )
6^64x6
D )
6^12x2^3
Answers
(6^4 . 2)³ = 6^12 . 2³
The answer is: D
reaction 1: y x- → y- x reaction 2: y z- → y- z reaction 3: z x- → z- x the three substances in order of increasing oxidizing ability (strength as an oxidizing agent). x,y,z
Answers
The substances in order of increasing oxidizing ability are: x < z < y.
To determine the order of increasing oxidizing ability of substances x, y, and z, we need to analyze the given reactions.
In reaction 1, y oxidizes x by removing an electron from x, forming y- and x+. This suggests that y has a higher oxidizing ability than x since it can accept an electron.
In reaction 2, y oxidizes z by removing an electron from z, forming y- and z+. Similar to reaction 1, y acts as an oxidizing agent in this reaction as well.
In reaction 3, z oxidizes x by removing an electron from x, forming z- and x+. Here, z exhibits oxidizing behavior by accepting an electron.
Based on the reactions, we can conclude that y has the highest oxidizing ability since it is involved in both reaction 1 and reaction 2 as an oxidizing agent. Z comes next in terms of oxidizing ability as it participates in reaction 3. Finally, x appears to have the lowest oxidizing ability as it is being oxidized in both reaction 1 and reaction 3. Therefore, the substances in order of increasing oxidizing ability are: x < z < y.
Learn more about oxidizing ability here:
https://brainly.com/question/32226850
#SPJ11
The drawing below shows the dimensions of Kim kite what is the area of Kim's Kite
Answers
Answer:
B 48 in.
Step-by-step explanation:
the formula is a=bh/2 and that formula will get you 48 in^2.
A bag contains 7 red, 3 yellow, and 4 blue marbles. What is the probability of pulling out a blue marble, followed by a red marble, without replacing the blue marble first?
Answers
Answer:
2/13
Step-by-step explanation:
P(Red,Blue) = 4/14 × 7/13
simplified it becomes 2/13
The approximation of s, xln (x + 6) dx using two points Gaussian quadrature formula is: 3.0323 2.8191 O This option O This option 3 1.06589 4.08176 The approximation of I = cos(x2 + 3) dx using simple Simpson's rule is: -0.65314 -0.93669 -1.57923 0.54869
Answers
The approximation of [tex]\int xln(x + 6) dx[/tex] using the two-point Gaussian quadrature formula is: 2.8191.
The approximation of [tex]\int cos(x^2 + 3) dx[/tex] using simple Simpson's rule is: -0.93669.
For the integral using the two-point Gaussian quadrature formula, we have:
[tex]x_1 = -\sqrt{1/3} = -0.57735\\x_2 = \sqrt{1/3} = 0.57735\\w1 = w2 = 1\\Approximation = w1 * f(x1) + w2 * f(x2)\\Approximation = 1 * f(-0.57735) + 1 * f(0.57735)[/tex]
Now, let's calculate the values:
[tex]f(x) = xln(x + 6)\\f(-0.57735) = -0.57735 * ln((-0.57735) + 6)\\f(0.57735) = 0.57735 * ln((0.57735) + 6)[/tex]
[tex]Approximation = -0.57735 * ln(5.42265) + 0.57735 * ln(6.57735)\\Approximation = 2.8191[/tex]
Therefore, the approximation of the integral ∫ xln(x + 6) dx using the two-point Gaussian quadrature formula with default values is approximately 2.8191.
Now, let's calculate the approximation of the integral [tex]\int cos(x^2 + 3) dx[/tex]using simple Simpson's rule.
In simple Simpson's rule, we divide the interval into subintervals. Let's assume the limits of integration are from a to b.
[tex]Approximation = (h/3) * [f(a) + 4f((a + b)/2) + f(b)][/tex]
Using the default values, let's assume a = 0 and b = 1:
[tex]h = (b - a) / 2 = (1 - 0) / 2 = 0.5\\Approximation = (0.5/3) * [f(0) + 4f((0 + 1)/2) + f(1)][/tex]
Now, let's calculate the values:
[tex]f(x) = cos(x^2 + 3)\\f(0) = cos(0^2 + 3) = cos(3)\\f(0.5) = cos((0.5)^2 + 3)\\f(1) = cos(1^2 + 3) = cos(4)\\Approximation = (0.5/3) * [cos(3) + 4f(0.5) + cos(4)]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [cos(3) + 4f(0.5) + cos(4)]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [-0.98999 + 4 * (-0.99966) - 0.65364]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [-0.98999 - 3.99864 - 0.65364]\\Approximation = 0.5/3 * [-5.64227]\\Approximation = -0.93669[/tex]
Therefore, the approximation of the integral [tex]\int cos(x^2 + 3) dx[/tex] using simple Simpson's rule with the given values is approximately -0.93669.
To know more about Simpson's rule, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30459578
#SPJ4
eight thousand eight and eight tenths in standard form help plz
Answers
Answer:
8,088.8
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve by elimination
x-2y=1
3х — 6y = 3
Answers
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3(x-2y=1)
3x-6y=3
3x-6y = 3
3x-6y = 3
3x-6y = 3
-3x+6y=-3
0 = 0
x & y can be any value.
A genetic experiment with peas resulted in one sample of oping that consisted of 443 green peas and 10 yelow peas a. Construct a 50% confidence intervallo state of the percentage of b. Based on the confidence interval do the results of the experiment appear to control the expectation that 20% of the ring peas won Construct a son contence terva Express the percentages in conform
Answers
a) Therefore, the 50% confidence interval for the percentage of yellow peas in the population is approximately (0.47%, 3.93%).
b) Since the confidence interval does not contain the value of 20%, we can say that the results of the experiment do not support the expectation that 20% of the peas should be yellow.
c) The 90% confidence interval for the percentage of green peas in the population is approximately (95.87%, 99.53%).
The data given in the problem is:
Sample size (n) = 443 + 10 = 453
Number of yellow peas (x) = 10
Number of green peas (n-x) = 443
Since the sample size is very large (n > 30), we can use the normal distribution to find the confidence interval.
a) To construct a 50% confidence interval for the percentage of yellow peas in the population, we use the following formula:
Lower limit = p - z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)
Upper limit = p + z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)
where: p = x/n = 10/453 = 0.022 (proportion of yellow peas in the sample)
z(α/2) = z(0.25) = 0.674 (z-value for a 50% confidence level)
Plugging in the values, we get:
Lower limit = 0.022 - 0.674√(0.022(1-0.022)/453) ≈ 0.0047
Upper limit = 0.022 + 0.674√(0.022(1-0.022)/453) ≈ 0.0393
Therefore, the 50% confidence interval for the percentage of yellow peas in the population is approximately (0.47%, 3.93%).
b) Since the confidence interval does not contain the value of 20%, we can say that the results of the experiment do not support the expectation that 20% of the peas should be yellow.
c) To construct a 90% confidence interval for the percentage of green peas in the population, we can use the same formula as before with x = 443:
Lower limit = p - z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)
Upper limit = p + z(α/2)√(p(1-p)/n)where:
p = x/n = 443/453 = 0.977 (proportion of green peas in the sample)
z(α/2) = z(0.05) = 1.645 (z-value for a 90% confidence level)
Plugging in the values, we get:
Lower limit = 0.977 - 1.645√(0.977(1-0.977)/453) ≈ 0.9587
Upper limit = 0.977 + 1.645√(0.977(1-0.977)/453) ≈ 0.9953
Therefore, the 90% confidence interval for the percentage of green peas in the population is approximately (95.87%, 99.53%).
To learn more about confidence interval
https://brainly.com/question/15712887
#SPJ11
Please help I can’t understand
My brain is gonna explode
No joke I’m serious
Answers
I search it but I failed sorry
for not answering I just don't know
In a population,weights of females are normally distributed with mean 52kg and standard deviation 6kg. Weights of males are normally distributed with mean 75kg and standard deviation 8kg. One male and one female are chosen at random. (a) What is the probability that the male is heavier than 81kg? [3marks] (b) What is the probability that the female is heavier than the male? Hint: If X and Y are independent Normal random variables then, for every ab e R,aX+bY has a Normal distribution. [3marks] (c If the male is above average weight(75kg),what is the probability that he is heav than 81kg?
Answers
The probability that he weighs more than 81 kg given that he is above the average weight is 0.4532.
(a) Probability that male is heavier than 81 kg can be found using the z-score formula;
z = (x - μ) / σ = (81 - 75) / 8 = 0.75P(z > 0.75) = 1 - P(z < 0.75)
Now referring to z-tables, we find that P(z < 0.75) = 0.7734
Therefore, P(z > 0.75) = 1 - P(z < 0.75) = 1 - 0.7734 = 0.2266
Thus, the probability that the male is heavier than 81 kg is 0.2266.
(b) Let X be the weight of female and Y be the weight of male. We know that X ~ N(52, 6) and Y ~ N(75, 8)
Let Z = X - Y then, Z ~ N(52 - 75, sqrt(6^2 + 8^2)) = N(-23, 10)
Now, we need to find the probability that X > Y. i.e P(X - Y > 0)P(X - Y > 0) can be written as P(Z > -23/10)
Now, referring to the z-tables, we can find that P(Z > -2.3) = 0.9893
Therefore, P(X > Y) = P(X - Y > 0) = 0.9893.
(c) Given that male weight is above average weight, we need to find the probability that he weighs more than 81 kg i.e. P(Y > 81 | Y > 75)
This is conditional probability and can be found using Bayes' Theorem:
P(Y > 81 | Y > 75) = P(Y > 75 | Y > 81) * P(Y > 81) / P(Y > 75)
Now, P(Y > 75 | Y > 81) = 1, P(Y > 81) can be found as:
P(Y > 81) = P(Z > (81 - 75) / 8) = P(Z > 0.75) = 1 - P(Z < 0.75) = 1 - 0.7734 = 0.2266
Also,P(Y > 75) = P(Z > 0) = 0.5Therefore,P(Y > 81 | Y > 75) = 1 * 0.2266 / 0.5 = 0.4532
To know more about Bayes' Theorem, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29598596
#SPJ11
The given information is that weights of females are normally distributed with mean 52kg and standard deviation 6kg. Weights of males are normally distributed with mean 75kg and standard deviation 8kg. One male and one female are chosen at random.
The probability that the male is heavier than 81kg is 0.2266.
The probability that the female is heavier than the male is 0.0107.
If the male is above average weight(75kg),then the probability that he is heavy than 81kg is 0.2266.
a) The weight of males is normally distributed with a mean of 75kg and a standard deviation of 8kg. The probability that the male is heavier than 81kg can be calculated as follows: z = (81 - 75) / 8
= 0.75P(Z > 0.75)
= 0.2266
Therefore, the probability that the male is heavier than 81 kg is 0.2266.
b) If X and Y are independent Normal random variables, then, for every ab e R, aX + bY has a Normal distribution. The weights of males and females are independent, normally distributed random variables with means of 75kg and 52kg and standard deviations of 8kg and 6kg respectively. Therefore, the difference in weights of the male and the female is a normally distributed random variable with mean μ = 75 - 52 = 23kg and standard deviation σ = √(8² + 6²) = √(100) = 10kg. Let Z be a standard normal variable. The probability that the female is heavier than the male can be calculated as follows:
P(X < Y) = P(X - Y < 0) = P[(X - Y - μ)/σ < (-23)/10] = P(Z < -2.3) = 0.0107
Therefore, the probability that the female is heavier than the male is 0.0107.
c) If the male is above average weight, then we can assume that he weighs 75 kg. The probability that he is heavier than 81 kg can be calculated as follows:
z = (81 - 75) / 8 = 0.75P(Z > 0.75) = 0.2266
Therefore, the probability that the male is above average weight and heavier than 81 kg is 0.2266.
To know more about probability visit
https://brainly.com/question/32004014
#SPJ11
Sergio ate 3.5 cookies. Each cookie contained 5.7 grams of sugar. How many grams of sugar did Sergio eat?
Answers
3.5 x 2.7 = 9.45
Answer:
19.95
Step-by-step explanation:
5.7 times 3 = 17.1
5.7 ÷ 2 = 2.85
17.1 + 2.85 = 19.95
A fence was installed around the edge of a rectangular garden. The length, 1, of the fence was 5 feet less than 3 times its width, w. The amount of fencing used was 90 feet. Write a system of equations or write an equation using one variable that models this situation. Determine algebraically the dimensions, in feet, of the garden.
Answers
The dimensions of the garden are 12.5 feet by 30.5 feet.
To model this situation, we can use two equations. Let the width of the rectangular garden be w feet and the length be l feet.
Then:We know that the perimeter of the garden is 90 feet because the amount of fencing used was 90 feet.Perimeter = sum of all sides2(l + w) = 90Divide both sides by 22(l + w)/2 = 45l + w = 45Now,
we also know that the length of the fence, 1, was 5 feet less than 3 times the width,
w.l = 3w - 5Substitute this equation for l in the first equation:3w - 5 + w = 45Simplify:4w - 5 = 45
Add 5 to both sides :4w = 50Divide both sides by 4:w = 12.5
Now that we know the width of the garden is 12.5 feet, we can use the equation for l to find the length:l = 3w - 5l = 3(12.5) - 5l = 30.5
To learn more about : dimensions
https://brainly.com/question/28107004
#SPJ8
Use the Chain Rule to find dw/dt.
w = xey/z, x = t7, y = 6 − t, z = 4 + 9t
dw/dt =
Answers
The value of dw/dt is [tex]e^\frac{y}{z}(7t^6- \frac{x}{z} + \frac{-9xy}{z^2} )[/tex]
To find dw/dt using the Chain Rule, we need to differentiate each component of the function [tex]w = xe^\frac{y}{z}[/tex] with respect to t and then multiply them together.
Given:
[tex]w = xe^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
x = t⁷
y = 6 - t
z = 4 + 9t
Let's find dw/dt step by step:
x = t⁷
Taking the derivative of x with respect to t:
dx/dt = 7t⁶
y = 6 - t
Taking the derivative of y with respect to t:
dy/dt = -1
z = 4 + 9t
Taking the derivative of z with respect to t:
dz/dt = 9
[tex]w = xe^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
Taking the derivative of w with respect to x:
[tex]\frac{dw}{dx} =e^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
[tex]w = xe^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
Taking the derivative of w with respect to y:
[tex]\frac{dw}{dy} = (\frac{x}{z} )e^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
[tex]w = xe^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
Taking the derivative of w with respect to z:
[tex]\frac{dw}{dz} = (\frac{-xy}{z^2} )e^\frac{y}{z}[/tex]
Apply the Chain Rule to find dw/dt:
dw/dt = (dw/dx)(dx/dt) + (dw/dy)(dy/dt) + (dw/dz)(dz/dt)
Substituting the derivatives we found earlier:
dw/dt [tex]= (e^\frac{y}{z})(7t^6) + (\frac{x}{z} )e^\frac{y}{z}(-1) + (\frac{-xy}{z^2} )e^\frac{y}{z}(9)[/tex]
dw/dt [tex]= e^\frac{y}{z}(7t^6- \frac{x}{z} + \frac{-9xy}{z^2} )[/tex]
Learn more about Chain Rule here
https://brainly.com/question/5967674
#SPJ4
I need help ASAP
How do I find the radius of a cone even if they don’t give the diameter
Who ever can answer this gets 30 points!!!
Answers
Answer:
dowload the link up the other one answer
the function \:h=-0.01x^2+0.9x models the height in feet, h, of a soccer ball as it travels a horizontal distance in feet, x. What is the maximin height of the soccer ball and how long does it take for the ball to reach this height
Answers
Answer:
Nice!
Step-by-step explanation:
Will mark brainliest if correct.
Answers
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
i am pretty sure the answer is d
Step-by-step explanation:
let me know if this is wrong
Please help! My assignment is due today! Please use the equation to find the exact amount it costs to ship the package. P.S. don't put it in a file, as I cannot reach it.
Answers
2x+3 3/2=1.5
Then do 2x /2 and u will get the y of 1.5