What precedent did these philosophers set for future western civilizations and their governments?

A.


the application of reason to governance

B.


the participation of ordinary citizens in lawmaking

C.


the protection of equality among all members of society

D.


the use of elections to select skilled, knowledgeable leaders

During Napoleon's time, the French people were willing to surrender their liberties for security. They were prepared to do so since the freedoms that they had been granted were continuously being infringed upon.

People were ready to give up their freedom of speech since the government controlled the press, making it a criminal offense to print or distribute "false news." Freedom of assembly and association was similarly restricted, and those caught participating in secret societies, such as the Masons, were punished.

The French people were willing to trade off their freedom of the press and their freedom of assembly, given the results that Napoleon's leadership had brought.Finally, the French were willing to surrender their liberty of thought. They were satisfied with Napoleon's belief in the primacy of the state over the individual. As long as he was in charge, the country would continue to prosper, and the people were content with this arrangement.

To know more about security visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32133916

#SPJ11

Answer:

Answer Below:

Explanation:

Mainly used for drinking because the use of water is limited. Until you find another way to get water you would be careful. The way of life would completely change due too no way of cleaning yourself. Hope this helps.

Answer:

They appointed leaders to oversee areas called diocese.

Explanation:

Bishops are in charges of dioceses

Answer:

Cause: the main cause for immigration of Latino people to the United Sates is the poorer economic conditions in Latin American countries when compared to the United States. All Latin American countries have a lot more poor people than the U.S., and many of these people do not find satisfactory economic opportunities in their own countries, reason why they opt to emigrate to the U.S.

Determining the main effect is tricky, because there are many. One effect is demographic change in the United States, with latino people representing a larger percentage of the total U.S. population over time. Another effect is that economic ties between the U.S. and Latin American countries have become closer, as most latino immigrants send money to their families back home in the form of remittances.

Answer:

Explanation:

Talk about how the ToV (Treaty of Versailles) humiliated Germany as a whole.

Talk about the hyperinflation caused by the printing of money because they had to pay a large amount of reparation  (part of the ToV).

Talk about how the country spent 1/3 of its income on war pensions to pay the widows and families who have lost their loved ones in the war.

Overall, Germany was on the brink of collapse.

Answer:

B. Free states did not want another slave state.

Solution :

1. The rulers of the Holy Land - Turks

2. Trips to Free Jerusalem - Crusades

3. Symbol of the Crusades - Red Cross

4. Organization Protecting Traders - Leagues

5. Origin of Fine Spices and Silks - Orient

6. Fought to Free Jerusalem - Crusaders

7. Caused Growth of Cities - Trade

8. Home of Prince Henry the Navigator - Portugal

9. Name given to Africa's Tip - Cape of Good Hope

10. Belonging to the Middle Ages - Medieval

11. City Held by the Turks - Jerusalem

12. Riches of West African Coast - Gold

13. Threatened Sailors at Sea - Pirates

Answer:

c

Explanation:

It let slaves free that were under union control. So mainly the North had zero slaves after the Emancipation Proclamation. Hope this helps

Answer:

ffyrtyuet

Explanation:

Answer:The Emancipation Proclamation did not apply to enslaved people in the border states of Missouri, Kentucky, Delaware, and Maryland, which had not joined the Confederacy. Lincoln exempted the border states from the proclamation because he didn't want to tempt them into joining the Confederacy.

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Right on edge

Answer:

investigating?Develop your thesis statement.Now that you have analyzed sources to use as evidence, revisit the essay question. Then, develop your thesis statement. If you need additional guidance, many writing resources are available to help you create a strong thesis statement.Form your argument.Once you have a clear, strong thesis statement, develop your argument. Makea particular effort to match the evidence in your sources to the points in your argument.Write your essay.As you write your paper, use quotations from and summaries of your sources to support your argument. Be careful to keep the following ideas in mind:To avoid plagiarism, make sure to cite your sources properly with in-text citationsas well as a works cited page.When you finish, reread the essay to check for all of the points above, and then proofread it to be sure your work doesn’t contain errors in grammar or spelling.You can also refer to the following resources:Understanding the Research ReportBeginning a Research ReportConstructing a Thesis StatementSteps for Writing a Quality PaperPaste a draft of your essay in the space provided.Task 2Print

Americans following the American Revolution aggressively denounced any traces of hierarchical or monarchical privilege associated with aristocratic power systems, which had traditionally been enforced in English society with titles of nobility.

As a result of the strong anti-monarchical sentiments inspired by the Revolutionary War, the newly established American nation sought to completely eradicate the concept of noble birth determining one’s societal status, rights, or expectations. American founders rejected the notion that any person would be granted special privilege or power simply because of their noble birthright.

This sentiment was encapsulated in the Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, which barred any individual with title of nobility from the federal government, and eventually spread to the state governments – many of which legislated laws prohibiting any type of formal aristocracy. As such, throughout the late 18th and early 19th centuries, emergent American society consistently denounced any insistence on the power or privilege of noble birth.

To know more about American Revolution, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/9053584

#SPJ4

Answer: The action or fact of accepting or yielding to a superior force or to the will or authority of another person. 'they were forced into submission' 'First, Hurston describes a gap in the relationship as Joe attempts to force Janie's submission to his authority.

Answer:

Ming

Explanation:

Answer:

disruption of trade

Explanation:

Perhaps the most immediate effect of Rome's fall was the breakdown of commerce and trade. The miles of Roman roads were no longer maintained and the grand movement of goods that was coordinated and managed by the Romans fell apart.

Explanation:

The 1800 United States presidential election was the fourth quadrennial presidential election. It was held from October 31 to December 3, 1800. In what is sometimes referred to as the "Revolution of 1800", Vice President Thomas Jefferson of the Democratic-Republican Party defeated incumbent President John Adams of the Federalist Party. The election was a political realignment that ushered in a generation of Democratic-Republican leadership

Answer: JFK was a good president

Explanation:

I think this because he lead the US to fight for the space race. He is the reason we went to the moon.

Answer:

i have two arguments. why he was a good president and why he was a bad one. you choose which one you want to choose.

- he was a bad president:

John F. Kennedy's glowing reputation is bound up with a bullet. Being murdered made him into a kind of political saint, and makes us forget that his years in the White House were a disaster. Why? Because he almost brought about the end of civilization as we know it.

Contrary to our sentimental image of JFK as a progressive visionary, he was actually a committed proponent of the Cold War and a foreign police hawk. Early in his tenure, Kennedy pushed forward with a secret plan to take down Fidel Castro's new regime in the nearby island of Cuba. This plan involved training, arming and deploying 1,500 Cuban exiles to mount a covert invasion of the island, inspire a popular uprising and overthrow Castro.

-he was a good president:

It's all too easy for us to sneer at Kennedy's stance as a Cold Warrior, all these decades later. But he was a man of his times, when paranoia and suspicion ruled the day. In the frightening ideological battle against the Soviets, nobody was immune to rash and half-baked ideas. In fact, the Bay of Pigs fiasco had actually been planned by President Eisenhower, not Kennedy, and simply been inherited by the Kennedy administration.

Yes, Kennedy chose to go ahead with the plan, but what president wouldn't have? Cuba was regarded as a genuine threat, a foothold for the Soviets right on America's doorstep. Kennedy HAD to do something. As Jim Rosenberger, author of The Brilliant Disaster, describes the dilemma over the Bay of Pigs plan: "[Kennedy] had a lot of doubts about it, a lot of concerns about it, but he never could figure out a way not to do it."

And as for the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy absolutely deserves credit for averting total global calamity. Barraged with conflicting opinions from military advisors - some of whom were pressing for the US to trigger war against the Soviets - Kennedy DID keep a cool head, and he DID make the right deal with the Soviets to steer the world away from a nuclear holocaust. It's sheer good luck we had him in the driving seat rather than someone who might have listened to bad advice and gone with a military response.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

~mina

Answer:

what year for this question?

Explanation:

Within the span of a few decades from the late 19th to the early 20th century, the United States was transformed from a predominately rural agrarian society to an industrial economy centered in large metropolitan cities. Prior to the American industrial revolution, most Americans were reared in largely isolated agricultural households and small towns that were linked to the external world by horse drawn wagons (Olmstead and Rhode 2000: 711). Except for towns that were connected to railroads or water borne shipping, isolation and the costs of overland transportation meant that many rural communities were largely self sufficient in food, clothing, and many other essentials of everyday life. This changed dramatically in the early decades of the 20th century, as the supply and lowered costs of manufactured goods created a consumer revolution for both urban and rural households. Many of these goods, which did not even exist a few decades earlier, were manufactured, marketed, and transported through a rapidly expanding national network of rail lines and highways. By 1920, one half of northern farms had automobiles and telephones (Olmstead and Rhode 2000: 712–713).

Theses changes were the direct result of the American industrial revolution that was founded on rising investment, employment, and productivity in the manufacturing sector. In 1880, when the agricultural frontier had largely disappeared, almost one-half of the American workers were still farmers and only one in seven workers (less than 15%) worked in manufacturing of any sort. The industrial sector, as late as 1870, consisted primarily of small firms and workshops that relied on artisan technology to produce tools, furniture, building materials, and other goods for local markets (Abramovitz and David 2000: 45). Many small industries, such as grain mills and sawmills, were often located in rural areas close to flowing rivers in order to power machinery. Following the technological revolutions of the early industrial age, workshops and small foundries were supplemented by large factories engaged in mass production. The development of commercial electricity at the end of the 19th century allowed industries to take advantage of the labor supply in large cities. The scale of change is illustrated by thdure not only tmregeGolureustrialization in the United States, but were also the age of urbanization and immigration. The 1880s were the first decade in American history, with the exception of the Civil War decade, when the urban population increased more than the rural population (in absolute numbers).rural to urban migration of the native born picked up during this era, but domestic urbanward migrants were dwarfed by the flood of immigrants coming to cities. From 1880 to 1920, the number of foreign born increased from almost 7 million to a little uhere a causal impact? Addressing this question, the objective of this analysis, requires consideration of the counterfactual of what would have been the course of the industrialization process in the United States if there had not been an immigrant workforce.

The most commonly cited reasons for the rapid American industrial revolution are the abundance of mineral resources, technological innovation, the evolution of the American system of manufacturing, railroads and lowered costs of transportation, education and human resources, and the rise of the managerial firm (Abramovitz and David 2000; Chandler 1977; Denison 1974; Hounshell 1984; Wright 1990). Among the studies that address the relationship between immigration and industrialization, few go beyond a general or abstract discussion. In a classic survey of the literature on the American industrial revolution in the Cambridge Economic History of the United States, the role of immigration is summarized in a single paragraph, which simply notes the overrepresentation of immigrants in the manufacturing labor force (Engerman and Sokoloff 2000: 387). There are some studies that conclude that the flood of immigration in the late 19th and early 20th centuries had an adverse impact on the per-capita economic growth, the wages of native workers, and diverted domestic migration away from industrializing cities (Hatton and Williamson 1998: Chapter 8; Goldin 1994). However, other researchers have questioned these conclusions and suggested that immigrants had a generally positive impact on the American economy and facilitated the economic mobility of native born workers during the age of industrialization (Carter and Sutch 1999; Haines 2000: 202; Muller 1993: 83–85; Thomas 1973: 174).follow me

Answer: world history WH

Explanation:

Answer:

it should be the United Nations

I will be working with a bird. Birds are a diverse group of animals that belong to the class Aves. They are characterized by their feathered bodies, beaks, and ability to fly (although not all birds can fly). With over 10,000 known species, birds inhabit a wide range of environments across the globe. The correct option is c.

Birds have adapted to various habitats, including forests, deserts, grasslands, and aquatic ecosystems. They come in different sizes, shapes, and colors, showcasing remarkable diversity. From the tiny hummingbirds to the large ostriches, birds exhibit a wide range of adaptations for survival and reproduction. They play crucial roles in ecosystems as pollinators, seed dispersers, and predators of insects and small animals.

Birds also contribute to the beauty of our natural surroundings with their melodious songs and vibrant plumage. As a researcher working with birds, I would study their behavior, ecology, migration patterns, and conservation.

I might investigate topics such as nesting habits, foraging strategies, communication, or the impact of environmental changes on bird populations. The study of birds offers a fascinating window into the complexities of the natural world and our interconnectedness with it.

Learn more about ecosystems here:

https://brainly.com/question/30237128

#SPJ4

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you did not include a reference to any text, excerpt, article, or book, to know who Doña Marina is, we can comment on the following.

According to our knowledge on this topic, we can say that this woman was better known as the "Malinche," the woman of the conqueror Hernan Cortés, who helped the Spaniards as a translator and interpreter.

The story of Doña Marina is representative of the collapse of Mesoamerican and South American societies in that "La Malinche" was a Mesoamerican woman from Veracruz, México. She was one of the slaves the Aztecas gave to Cortés as a tribute or a "welcome gift." La Malinche betrayed the Mesoamerican Indian people and worked for Cortés in exchange for protection and a better living.

This betrayal has been studied by historians and they conclude that some Native Mesoamerican tribes betrayed other Indians such as teh Aztecs because the Aztecs were a warrior empire that conquered many tribes and forced the Indians to be slaves and pay tribute.

So when the Spanish conquerors arrived, these tribes saw an opportunity for retribution against the Aztecas, That is why they betrayed them That was the case of the Indian tribes such as the Tlaxcalans and Cholullans.

Source is the History website:

Minutes after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration as the 40th president of the United States, the 52 U.S. captives held at the U.S. embassy in Teheran, Iran, are released, ending the 444-day Iran Hostage Crisis.

On November 4, 1979, the crisis began when militant Iranian students, outraged that the U.S. government had allowed the ousted shah of Iran to travel to New York City for medical treatment, seized the U.S. embassy in Teheran. The Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran’s political and religious leader, took over the hostage situation, refusing all appeals to release the hostages, even after the U.N. Security Council demanded an end to the crisis in an unanimous vote. However, two weeks after the storming of the embassy, the Ayatollah began to release all non-U.S. captives, and all female and minority Americans, citing these groups as among the people oppressed by the government of the United States. The remaining 52 captives remained at the mercy of the Ayatollah for the next 14 months.

President Jimmy Carter was unable to diplomatically resolve the crisis, and on April 24, 1980, he ordered a disastrous rescue mission in which eight U.S. military personnel were killed and no hostages rescued. Three months later, the former shah died of cancer in Egypt, but the crisis continued. In November 1980, Carter lost the presidential election to Republican Ronald Reagan. Soon after, with the assistance of Algerian intermediaries, successful negotiations began between the United States and Iran. On the day of Reagan’s inauguration, the United States freed almost $8 billion in frozen Iranian assets, and the hostages were released after 444 days. The next day, Jimmy Carter flew to West Germany to greet the Americans on their way home.

Answer:

forsest fires and dust storms

Explanation:

Answer:

i am not sure what the answer is but i am not sure if my explanation will help.

Explanation:

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), often referred to as the Dred Scott decision, was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court in which the Court held that the US Constitution was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and so the rights and privileges that the Constitution confers upon American citizens could not apply to them

Answer:

Where are the following?

Explanation:

Be more specific

Answer:

D. Rebel slave states

Explanation:

The words "designated States" and "parts of states" refer to the Rebel Slave states.

Thus the correct answer is option D.

To learn more about Emancipation Proclamation, refer: https://brainly.com/question/880731

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

There are no women joined the Air Force during ww2.

The colonial Georgia rice plantation complex was modeled after the one in South Carolina. Therefore, the correct option is A.

Rice plantations were prominent in various parts of the world, particularly in regions with suitable climate and soil conditions for rice cultivation. Rice cultivation was introduced to the American colonies through the efforts of planters from South Carolina who brought their expertise and practices to Georgia.

South Carolina was known for its successful rice plantations, and the techniques and systems developed there were replicated in Georgia to establish a profitable rice industry.

Thus, the ideal selection is option A.

Learn more about  rice plantation here:

https://brainly.com/question/10775002

#SPJ4