Which expression is equivalent to 16 + 2 * 36?

Answer:

a) 12:45 am

b) 7:30 pm

c) 20:15

d) 0:00

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We know that the 24-hour clock has no "am" or "pm" because in a day, there are 24 hours, so "pm" would simply be more than 12 hours.

The 12th hour marks noon, which is "12:00 pm" in 12-hour times. Anything after that would start from 1 and would be marked with a pm.

So 12:45 in 12-hour format would be 12:45 pm because it's passed the noon-mark, which is the 12th hour. Anything after noon would be marked with a "pm."

b) Same thing here: 19:30 has also passed the noon mark, the 12th hour. It would be marked with a "pm."

But there is no "19 'o clock" in 12-hour format (hence the 12-hour 12 hours). So to find that, we know that it has already passed noon. We can subtract to find how many hours it has passed noon:

19 - 12 = 7

So it's the 7th hour.

So it would be 7:30 pm.

c) Because there is no "am" or "pm" in the 24-hour clock, we have to see how many hours past noon it has been.

8:15 pm means it has passed noon by 8 hours and 15 minutes. So we add this to the noon mark (first 12 hours of the day).

12 + 8 = 20

This is our hours. We can attach it to the minutes: 20:15.

d) Midnight in 12-hour terms would be 12:00 am. It would be officially the next day, and it's a reset button.

If it were Saturday today, and it's 11:59 pm, it's still Saturday. But once that clock turns 12:00 pm, it's Sunday.

This means that no time has passed during Sunday yet—it just reset.

So it would be 0:00 because no time has passed officially on Sunday yet.

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: X=8 Y=138

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: x=2 and y=12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Well 3^17-3^15+3^13 equals 116,385,579

Now divide that by 73

So 116,385,579 ÷ 73

That equals 1,594,323

Hope this helps

Answer: 3^13*73

Step-by-step explanation:

3^17-3^15+3^13 So you factor out 3^13

=3^13(3^4-3^2+1)

3^4-3^2+1=73

3^13*73

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There is really only one solution which is the third choice. When you are dealing with the equation in the form of y = mx + b, the b stands for the y-intercept. So, your y-intercept equals -1. When you are finding the x-intercept you can just substitute y for 0(the definition of x-intercept is where the graph crosses the x-axis, meaning y needs to be equal to 0) and you get that x equals 1/5.

Answer:

636372

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is 636372

The number of options for a, b, and c that fulfill the system and produce the stated solution is unlimited.

To determine the coefficients a, b, and c such that the system of equations satisfies the given solution x = 1, y = -1, and z = 2, we can substitute these values into the equations and solve for a, b, and c.

Substituting x = 1, y = -1, and z = 2 into the first equation:

a(1) + b(-1) - 3(2) = -1

a - b - 6 = -1

Substituting x = 1, y = -1, and z = 2 into the second equation:

a(1) + 3(-1) - c(2) - 3 = 0

a - 3 - 2c - 3 = 0

a - 2c = 6

Now we have a system of two equations with two unknowns:

a - b - 6 = -1

a - 2c = 6

We can solve this system using standard techniques such as substitution or elimination.

From the first equation, we have a = b - 5. Substituting this into the second equation, we get:

(b - 5) - 2c = 6

b - 2c = 11

So we have the system:

a = b - 5

b - 2c = 11

The values of a, b, and c can be chosen arbitrarily as long as they satisfy these equations. For example, we can choose a = 0, b = 6, and c = -2, which satisfies the system of equations. However, there are infinitely many possible choices for a, b, and c that would yield the given solution.

To know more about the substitution or elimination refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/28974050#

#SPJ11

a. In this case, since f(t) = 5, L{5} = ∫[0 to ∞] 5 * e^(-st) dt. b. the antiderivative simplifies to ∫(5 * e^(-st)) dt = (5/s) * e^(-st). c. the Laplace transform simplifies to (5/s) * (0 - 1).

A) To set up an integral for finding the Laplace transform of f(t) = 5, we can use the definition of the Laplace transform. The Laplace transform of a function f(t) is given by the integral:

L{f(t)} = ∫[0 to ∞] f(t) * e^(-st) dt

where s is the complex frequency parameter. In this case, since f(t) = 5, we have:

L{5} = ∫[0 to ∞] 5 * e^(-st) dt

B) To find the antiderivative corresponding to the previous part, we can integrate the function 5 * e^(-st) with respect to t. The antiderivative, or indefinite integral, of 5 * e^(-st) dt is:

∫(5 * e^(-st)) dt = (5/s) * e^(-st) + C

where C is the constant of integration. Since we are given that the constant term is 0, the antiderivative simplifies to:

∫(5 * e^(-st)) dt = (5/s) * e^(-st)

C) To evaluate the Laplace transform of f(t) = 5, we need to compute the integral from 0 to ∞. Plugging in the antiderivative from part B, we have:

L{f(t)} = ∫[0 to ∞] 5 * e^(-st) dt = lim[T→∞] [(5/s) * e^(-sT) - (5/s) * e^(-s(0))]

As T approaches infinity, the term e^(-sT) goes to 0, since the exponential function decays as the exponent becomes more negative. Therefore, the Laplace transform simplifies to:

L{5} = lim[T→∞] [(5/s) * e^(-sT) - (5/s) * e^(0)]

= (5/s) * (0 - 1)

Simplifying further, we find:

L{5} = -5/s

D) The Laplace transform L{f(t)} = -5/s exists for values of s where the integral converges. The Laplace transform is defined for a certain range of complex numbers, which forms the domain of the Laplace transform. In this case, the Laplace transform of f(t) = 5 exists for all complex numbers s except for s = 0. Therefore, the domain of f(s) is the set of all complex numbers except for s = 0.

Learn more about Laplace transform here

https://brainly.com/question/29583725

#SPJ11

The correlation coefficient between X and Y for the given moments is equal to (b + c) / √(b²(1 + 2c) + 2bc²).

Y = a + bX+cX²

To find the correlation coefficient between two random variables X and Y,

Calculate their covariance and standard deviations.

Find the covariance between X and Y.

The covariance between X and Y is ,

cov(X, Y) = E[(X - E[X])(Y - E[Y])]

To calculate this, find the expected values E[X] and E[Y].

Since we are given the first four moments of X,

Use them to find the mean (E[X]) and the variance (Var[X]) of X,

E[X]

= μ

= 1

Var[X]

= E[X²] - (E[X])²

= 2 - 1²

= 2 - 1

= 1

Now let us find E[Y],

E[Y] = E[a + bX + cX²]

= a + bE[X] + cE[X²]

To calculate E[X²], use the second moment of X,

E[X²] = 2

Substituting these values, we have,

E[Y] = a + b(1) + c(2)

Now calculate the covariance,

cov(X, Y)

= E[(X - E[X])(Y - E[Y])]

= E[X·Y - X·E[Y] - E[X]·Y + E[X]·E[Y]]

= E[X·Y] - E[X]·E[Y] - E[X]·E[Y] + E[X]·E[Y]

= E[X·Y] - E[X]·E[Y]

The second moment of XY,

E[XY]

= E[(a + bX + cX²)X]

= E[aX + bX² + cX³]

= aE[X] + bE[X²] + cE[X³]

To calculate E[X³], use the third moment of X,

E[X³] = 3

Substituting these values, we have,

E[XY]

= aE[X] + bE[X²] + cE[X³]

= a(1) + b(2) + c(3)

= a + 2b + 3c

Finally, substitute the expressions for E[XY] and E[X]·E[Y] back into the covariance formula to obtain,

cov(X, Y)

= E[XY] - E[X]·E[Y]

= (a + 2b + 3c) - (1)(a + b(1) + c(2))

= a + 2b + 3c - a - b - 2c

= b + c

Next, calculate the standard deviations of X and Y.

The standard deviation of X is the square root of the variance,

σ(X)

= √Var[X]

= √1

= 1

The standard deviation of Y can be calculated as follows,

Var[Y]

= Var[a + bX + cX²]

= Var[bX + cX²]

= b²Var[X] + c²Var[X²] + 2bcCov[X, X²]

Var[X] and Var[X²] from the given moments,

Var[X] = 1

Var[X²]

= E[X⁴] - (E[X²])²

= 4 - 2²

= 4 - 4

= 0

Substituting these values, we have,

Var[Y]

= b²Var[X] + c²Var[X²] + 2bcCov[X, X²]

= b²(1) + c²(0) + 2bcCov[X, X²]

= b² + 2bcCov[X, X²]

Since Cov[X, X²] = b + c, substitute this back into the equation,

Var[Y]

= b² + 2bc(b + c)

= b² + 2b²c + 2bc²

= b²(1 + 2c) + 2bc²

The standard deviation of Y is the square root of the variance,

σ(Y)

= √Var[Y]

= √(b²(1 + 2c) + 2bc²)

Finally, calculate the correlation coefficient,

p(X, Y)

= cov(X, Y) / (σ(X) · σ(Y))

= (b + c) / (1 · √(b²(1 + 2c) + 2bc²))

= (b + c) / √(b²(1 + 2c) + 2bc²)

Therefore, the correlation coefficient between X and Y is given by (b + c) / √(b²(1 + 2c) + 2bc²).

Learn more about correlation coefficient here

brainly.com/question/32545037

#SPJ4

Answer:

201.06in²

plz mark me as brainliest

Answer:

$13.04

Step-by-step explanation:

First, multiply 16.89 by 1.2, 0.6, and 1.0725. You should get a weird number on your calculator saying 13.042458, but just round 2 to the 4 ( 4 stays the same) and remove all the other numbers to get $13.04

Answer:336cm cube

Step-by-step explanation:

12x4x7 i think im  justlearning this to

The Laurent series of cos z centered at z = 1 is: cos(z - 1) = ∑((-1)^n * ((2n C k) * z^(2n - k)))/(2n)!

To obtain the Laurent series of the function cos z centered at z = 1, we can use the known Maclaurin series expansion of the cosine function and then adjust it for the center of expansion.

The Maclaurin series expansion of cos z is given by:

cos z = ∑((-1)^n * z^(2n))/(2n)!

To center the expansion at z = 1, we can substitute z - 1 for z in the series:

cos(z - 1) = ∑((-1)^n * (z - 1)^(2n))/(2n)!

Expanding this expression using the binomial theorem, we have:

cos(z - 1) = ∑((-1)^n * ((-1)^n * (2n C k) * z^(2n - k)))/(2n)!

Simplifying further, we obtain:

cos(z - 1) = ∑((-1)^n * ((2n C k) * z^(2n - k)))/(2n)!

To know more about Laurent series refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32273131#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Part A: In order to find the x-intercepts, you should set f(x)=0. Then, .  and .

Part B: From the function, it is visible that it is going to be a minimum, because the function is cup-size. Vertex coordinates can be calculated by the formula . Then  and . The vertex coordinates are (-1.25, -0.125)

Part C: By using the vertex coordinates, we can construct the vertex of the function and then using the information about the x-intercept we can complete the function. The function looks like in the picture below.

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the chi-square statistic for the given sample is 1.846 (rounded to three decimal places).

Chi-square Test Chi-square test is a type of statistical test that is used to find a relationship between two categorical variables.The given table shows the age distribution and location of a random sample of 166 buffalo in a national park.

Age Lamar District Nez Perce District Firehole District Row TotalCalf 14 17 10 41Yearling 13 11 9 33Adult 36 30 26 92Column Total 63 58 45 166Calculation: The formula for the Chi-Square goodness-of-fit test statistic is:χ2 = Σ [ (O − E)2 / E ]Where,χ2 = chi-square statisticO = observed valueE = expected valueExpected frequency formula:E = (row total * column total) / n

Where,n = grand totalExpected Frequency Calf Yearling Adult Lamar District 41*63/166 = 15.590 33*63/166 = 12.530 92*63/166 = 35.879 Nez Perce District 41*58/166 = 14.339 33*58/166 = 10.979 92*58/166 = 32.682 Firehole District 41*45/166 = 11.071 33*45/166 = 9.491 92*45/166 = 25.437

Chi-square test statistic can be calculated by using the below formula:χ2 = Σ [ (O − E)2 / E ]

Chi-square test statistic = (14 - 15.590)^2/15.590 + (17 - 14.339)^2/14.339 + (10 - 11.071)^2/11.071 + (13 - 12.530)^2/12.530 + (11 - 10.979)^2/10.979 + (9 - 9.491)^2/9.491 + (36 - 35.879)^2/35.879 + (30 - 32.682)^2/32.682 + (26 - 25.437)^2/25.437χ2 = 0.390 + 0.557 + 0.082 + 0.043 + 0.079 + 0.022 + 0.009 + 0.534 + 0.130χ2 = 1.846 (rounded to three decimal places)

Thus, the value of the chi-square statistic for the given sample is 1.846 (rounded to three decimal places).

To know more about frequency visit:

https://brainly.com/question/254161

#SPJ11

The value of the chi-square statistic for the sample is 1.396 (rounded to 3 decimal places).

To find the chi-square statistic for the given sample, we need to perform the following steps:

Step 1: Calculate the expected frequency for each cell.

Step 2: Calculate the chi-square statistic using the formula.

The expected frequency for each cell is calculated by multiplying the row total and column total for that cell and dividing by the grand total.

Expected frequency for the cell (1,1) = (41*63)/166

= 15.542.

Expected frequency for the cell (1,2) = (41*58)/166

= 14.458.

Expected frequency for the cell (1,3) = (41*45)/166

= 11.000.

Expected frequency for the cell (2,1) = (33*63)/166

= 12.542.

Expected frequency for the cell (2,2) = (33*58)/166

= 11.458.

Expected frequency for the cell (2,3) = (33*45)/166

= 8.000.

Expected frequency for the cell (3,1) = (92*63)/166

= 35.000.

Expected frequency for the cell (3,2) = (92*58)/166

= 31.542.

Expected frequency for the cell (3,3) = (92*45)/166

= 25.458.

The chi-square statistic is calculated using the formula:

[tex]X^2 = \sum(O - E)^2[/tex] / Ewhere O is the observed frequency and E is the expected frequency.

The calculation is shown in the table below:

Age   Lamar District Nez   Perce District Firehole   District Row Total
Calf      14 17 10 41
Yearling 13 11 9 33
Adult 36 30 26 92
Column Total 63 58 45 166
Expected frequency 15.542 14.458 11.000 12.542 11.458 8.000 35.000 31.542 25.458
[tex](O - E)^2 / E[/tex] 0.022 0.160 0.072 0.154 0.113 0.305 0.067 0.102 0.401
[tex]X^2 = \sum(O - E)^2[/tex] / E = 1.396 (rounded to 3 decimal places).

Therefore, the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample is 1.396 (rounded to 3 decimal places).

To know more about frequency, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29739263

#SPJ11

To answer the questions, we need the value of P% (individual attached data 1) representing the percentage of defective parts produced by the machine.

Assuming we have the value of P%, we can use the binomial distribution formula to find the probabilities. The formula is given by:

[tex]P(x) = C(n, x) * p^x * (1 - p)^{(n - x)}[/tex]

Where:

P(x) is the probability of x successes (defective parts),

C(n, x) is the number of combinations of n items taken x at a time,

p is the probability of success for each trial (P% converted to a decimal),

n is the total number of trials (50 parts in this case).

Using this formula, we can calculate the probabilities for finding 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 defective parts in a sample of 50 parts.

To visualize the probabilities, we can create a graphical illustration using appropriate computer software, such as a bar chart or a probability distribution plot, showing the probabilities for each number of defective parts.

Additionally, we can find the probability that less than three components will be defective by summing the probabilities of finding 0, 1, and 2 defective parts. Similarly, we can find the probability that no more than three components will be defective by summing the probabilities of finding 0, 1, 2, and 3 defective parts.

Once we have the value of P% (individual attached data 1), we can perform the calculations and provide the graphical illustration to further illustrate the probabilities.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

r = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the question,

4(r + 4) = 10r - 20

4r + 16 = 10r - 20

16 + 20 = 10r - 4r

6r = 36

r = 36 / 6

r = 6

Answer:

375

Step-by-step explanation:

500-125(25% of 500)=375

1.  the upper weight limit the kayak needs to support for the company to meet their claim is 270 pounds (rounded off to nearest pound).

2. the probability that a randomly selected rider falls into the weight range of 135-210 pounds is 0.6245 or approximately 62.45%.

3. It is important for Rogue River Kayaks to consistently look to the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) to update the distribution of weights in the United States because the company needs to ensure that their kayaks can accommodate the maximum number of people possible.

As the distribution of weights in the population changes, the company needs to adjust the design of their kayaks to meet the needs of their customers.

By staying up-to-date with the latest data provided by NTSB, Rogue River Kayaks can ensure that their products remain competitive and continue to meet the needs of their customers.

1. We know that the weights of men in the United States are normally distributed with a mean (μ) of 188.6 pounds and a standard deviation (σ) of 38.9 pounds.

Using Excel, we can use the formula NORM.

INV to find the upper weight limit for the kayak to support if Rogue River Kayaks claims that they can fit 99% of men in their Boulder Buster Kayak.

The formula for NORM.

INV is =NORM.INV(probability,mean,standard deviation)

Where probability = 0.99, mean = 188.6, standard deviation = 38.9.

Thus, =NORM.INV(0.99,188.6,38.9)
= 269.60

Therefore, the upper weight limit the kayak needs to support for the company to meet their claim is 270 pounds (rounded off to the nearest pound).

2. To find the probability that a randomly selected rider falls into the ideal weight range for kayakers in the Boulder Buster, we need to find the z-scores for the given weight range and then use the standard normal distribution table.

The z-score formula is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the weight, μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

For the lower weight limit of 135 pounds, the z-score is z = (135 - 188.6) / 38.9 = -1.382

For the upper weight limit of 210 pounds, the z-score is z = (210 - 188.6) / 38.9 = 0.551

Using the standard normal distribution table, we can find the probability that a z-score falls between -1.382 and 0.551.

The probability is

P(z < 0.551) - P(z < -1.382)

= 0.7088 - 0.0843

= 0.6245

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected rider falls into the weight range of 135-210 pounds is 0.6245 or approximately 62.45%.

3. It is important for Rogue River Kayaks to consistently look to the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) to update the distribution of weights in the United States because the company needs to ensure that their kayaks can accommodate the maximum number of people possible.

As the distribution of weights in the population changes, the company needs to adjust the design of their kayaks to meet the needs of their customers.

By staying up-to-date with the latest data provided by NTSB, Rogue River Kayaks can ensure that their products remain competitive and continue to meet the needs of their customers.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

Mean = 62

Step-by-step explanation:

X = mean ± sd

82 = mean + 2(s.d) - - (1)

32 = mean - 3sd ___(2)

82 = mean + 2sd

82 - 32= 2sd + 3sd

50 = 5sd

sd = 50/5

sd = 10

From (2):

32 = mean - 3sd

32 = mean - 3(10)

32 = mean - 30

32 + 30 = mean

62 = mean

The function value for f(x) depends on the value of x. The function value of f(x) can be determined as follows:

- For x < -1, f(x) = -2x - 2.

- For x ≥ 1, [tex]f(x) = x^2 + 2x - 1[/tex].

The function value for f(x) depends on the value of x. If x is less than -1, then the function f(x) can be calculated as -2x - 2. On the other hand, if x is greater than or equal to 1, then f(x) can be determined as [tex]x^2 + 2x - 1[/tex].

To summarize, the function f(x) is defined differently based on the value of x. For x values less than -1, f(x) equals -2x - 2. For x values greater than or equal to 1, f(x) is given by  [tex]x^2 + 2x - 1[/tex]

In the first paragraph,  provided a brief summary of the function value based on the given conditions. In the second paragraph, explained how the function f(x) is defined for different ranges of x.

Learn more about greater than here: https://brainly.com/question/29163855

#SPJ11

The interpretation of the given confidence interval (CI) is:

B. The true value of μ₁ - μ₂ lies somewhere between -30 and -20.

A confidence interval provides a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to fall with a certain level of confidence. In this case, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two population means, μ₁ - μ₂, is from -30 to -20. This means that based on the sample data and the calculations performed, we can be 95% confident that the true value of μ₁ - μ₂ lies within this range.

Option A is incorrect because it states that the value of μ₁ is between 20 and 30 less than μ₂, which is not supported by the confidence interval.

Option C is incorrect because it states that the value of μ₁ is between 20 and 30 greater than μ₂, which is also not supported by the confidence interval.

Option D is incorrect because it suggests that there is no significant difference between μ₁ and μ₂, which is not necessarily the case. The confidence interval indicates a range of plausible values for the difference, but it does not directly address the presence or absence of a significant difference.

Therefore, the correct interpretation is that the true value of μ₁ - μ₂ is expected to lie between -30 and -20 with 95% confidence.\

To know more about  confidence interval click here :

https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ4

Answer: 1,145,375 centimeters cubed

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 1,145,375cm I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 336

Step-by-step explanation:

8 * 3 * 14

Given function is: f(x)= 9xTo find the values of the given function at the indicated values: Round off the answer to 3 decimal places.1. f(1/2).

f(1/2):

Plug x = 1/2 into the function:

f(1/2) = 9(1/2)

Simplifying, we find that f(1/2) = 4.5.

Similarly, for the remaining parts,

Substitute x = 1/2 in the given function. f(1/2) = 9 (1/2) = 4.5002. f(√6).

Substitute x = √6 in the given function. f(√6) = 9 √6 = 27.7123. f(-2). Substitute x = -2 in the given function. f(-2) = 9 (-2) = -18.0004. f(0.4).

Substitute x = 0.4 in the given function. f(0.4) = 9 (0.4) = 3.600. The required values of the given function are: f(1/2) = 4.500f(√6) = 27.712f(-2) = -18.000f(0.4) = 3.600.

To know more about Substitution , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30239677

#SPJ11

Answer:

The length of [tex]\overline{JO}[/tex] is 48.

Step-by-step explanation:

A square is a quadrilateral whose four sides have the same length and four internal angles have the same measure. The sum of measures of internal angles in quadrilaterals equals 360°. Let [tex]m\,\angle BOJ = 4\cdot x -6[/tex] and [tex]BO = 2\cdot x - 8[/tex], the value of [tex]x[/tex] is:

[tex]4\cdot (4\cdot x - 6) = 360^{\circ}[/tex]

[tex]16\cdot x -24 = 360^{\circ}[/tex]

[tex]16\cdot x = 384^{\circ}[/tex]

[tex]x = 24[/tex]

And the length of [tex]JO[/tex] is:

[tex]JO = BO = 2\cdot x - 8[/tex]

[tex]JO = 40[/tex]

The length of [tex]\overline{JO}[/tex] is 48.

Answer:

C would be your answer!

Step-by-step explanation: