Why are implied powers of Congress, why are they important, but why do they make limits on Congress’ powers an urgency?
Answer:
Because they set limits to branches
Explanation:
HAPPY PRIDE MONTH!!!!!️️⚧️
Answer: HAPPY PRIDE MONTH BESTIES
REMEMBER YOU'RE VALID AND IT MIGHT BE HARD TO GO THROUGH THESE BAD TIMES BUT JUST REMEMBER YOU'LL GET THROUGH IT <333
Tenement housing usually consisted of small apartments that offered tenants clean, cheap housing. True. False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Please hurry and don't put a link for the answer whoever answers first will get brainliest and 30 points
What percentage of Americans believes that humans are causing global warming?
How was long distance trade easier for muslims
Answer:
helpful in trade, 10 days without water, long distance across Sahara, camel saddle made it easier to bring things
Explanation:
Why did Prudence Crandall open the Canterbury School?
A
to educate immigrant children
B
to educate girls
С
to educate African American girls
D
to provide religious education
Based on your answer to the first question, what were the specific causes of China's economic turn around?
Some historians consider the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century to have been crucial decades in the development of Western thought. What evidence supports that contention?
Hi. You did not enter the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
A textual evidence is a justification that the author uses to prove an argument presented in the text. This evidence seeks to present elements that prove that the author's argument about something must be considered correct and true. In this case, to answer your question, you should read the entire text and identify the sentences the author uses to prove that the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were crucial decades in the development of Western thought. In this case, the author can present the scientific discoveries made during this period that were essential to explain and solve several problems that humanity did not know how to solve.
Supporters of the Union looked to Article VI of the Constitution for support for their argument. Read the excerpt from Article VI and then choose and defend a point of view regarding whether the Constitution corroborates (supports) a view that the Union is permanent.
“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
The Supremacy Clause of Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.
Answer:
The Supporters of the Union had a point in this argument, 'the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land...' this excerpt states that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. This would contradict the Democrats' opinion that a state shall decide for itself's view on slavery, because any federal treaties or laws take priority over any state laws. If the government further decides to abolish slavery, all sectional interests would be ignored as the federal laws take priority over state laws. If popular sovereignty was made permanent, and the government decided for itself the view on slavery, popular sovereignty wouldn't exist.
Explanation:
Because popular sovereignty was very popular in the South, but the Constitution clearly states that federal laws take priority over state laws, so If a state law decides for itself that the state will accept slavery, but the government passes a law abolishing slavery, popular sovereignty no longer exists because the federal law abolishing slavery takes priority over any state wishing to accept slavery. This should show us that popular sovereignty or any sectional interest is proven to be invalid because the federal government will always have priority over the state government
Plz help me well mark brainliest if correct..????.
Answer:
The answer would have to be D.
Explanation:
PLS HELP 30 POINTS
In the nineteenth century, political leaders Victor Emmanuel and Prime Minister Count
Camillo Cavour fought for national unity of Italy. What type of nationalism is this an example of?
bipartisan nationalism
economic nationalism
civic nationalism
popular nationalism
Answer:
economic nationalism
Explanation:
Hope I helped! Ask me anything if you have any questions! Brainiest plz! Hope you make a 100% and have a nice day! -Amelia♥
Answer:
The correct awnser is civic nationalism
Explanation:
Hope this helps :]
What laws did the Nazis create against Jewish people?
The application of racial and eugenic laws and policies in Nazi Germany
Targeted groups
the application of reca and engineers laws and policies in Nazi Germany
30. Which event took place after the Civil War and before World War II?
Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. June 28, 1914. ...
The Armenian Genocide. April 24, 1915. ...
Battle of the Somme. ...
Treaty of Versailles Presented to German Delegation. ...
Adolf Hitler Issues Comment on the “Jewish Question” ...
Nazi Party Platform. ...
Beer Hall Putsch. ...
Adolf Hitler Becomes Leader of the Reestablished Nazi Party.