How do these "Mexican Barrios" in Japan compare to the ones in Los Angeles?

Answer:

The treatment of slaves varied depending on the period and the region in question, so it is difficult to provide a comprehensive answer. However, in general, slavery existed in many societies throughout history, including in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas, before the arrival of Europeans in the Americas.

Explanation:

The treatment of slaves varied depending on the period and the region in question, so it is difficult to provide a comprehensive answer. However, in general, slavery existed in many societies throughout history, including in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas, before the arrival of Europeans in the Americas.

Before European involvement in the African slave trade, slavery in Africa was a complex institution with various forms and purposes. In some societies, slaves were treated as members of the family and could even rise to positions of power and influence. In other societies, slaves were used for manual labor and treated harshly. In many cases, slaves were acquired through warfare, debt, or as punishment for crimes.

European involvement in the African slave trade began in the 15th century, and over the following centuries, millions of Africans were forcibly taken from their homes and transported across the Atlantic to the Americas to work as slaves on plantations. The transatlantic slave trade was characterized by extreme brutality, as slaves were treated as property and subjected to inhumane conditions, forced labor, and physical and sexual abuse. Slaves were often forced to work on sugar, tobacco, and cotton plantations, and many died from overwork, disease, or mistreatment.

In short, while slavery existed in many societies throughout history, the European involvement in the African slave trade led to a particularly brutal form of slavery that treated human beings as property and subjected them to extreme cruelty and exploitation.

False.sister exchange, where the sister of the groom married the brother of the bride in a double ceremony, was the not the ideal marriage arrangement for owens valley paiute

Sister exchange was a traditional marriage arrangement among some Native American groups, but it was not specific to the Owens Valley Paiute. Additionally, the practice varied widely among different tribes and was not universally accepted or practiced. In sister exchange, two men would marry two women who were sisters, and the two women would move into the households of their respective husbands. This practice helped to establish and reinforce social ties between families and communities, and it also helped to ensure that women were provided for in the event that their husbands died or were unable to provide for them. However, as with any cultural practice, it is important to recognize that sister exchange was not universally practiced or viewed as ideal by all members of the Owens Valley Paiute or any other group that may have engaged in the practice.

Learn more about Sister exchange here:

https://brainly.com/question/10438779

#SPJ11

Answer:

D- Hindu; India

Explanation:

There are several differences between the territories under the Tang and Song dynasties in China:

Size and Boundaries: The Tang dynasty controlled a much larger territory than the Song dynasty. At its height, the Tang empire included not only China but also parts of Central Asia, Korea, and Vietnam. In contrast, the Song dynasty was limited to China proper and did not extend beyond its current boundaries.

Capital City: The Tang dynasty had its capital in Chang'an, which was one of the largest cities in the world at the time. The Song dynasty, on the other hand, had its capital in Kaifeng, which was a smaller city and located further to the east.

Economy: The Song dynasty had a more prosperous economy compared to the Tang dynasty. During the Song dynasty, there was a significant growth in commerce, trade, and agriculture. This was facilitated by the development of the Grand Canal, which connected the Yellow River to the Yangtze River, making transportation of goods easier.

Military Power: The Tang dynasty had a stronger military than the Song dynasty. During the Tang dynasty, the empire had a powerful army that was instrumental in expanding its territories. In contrast, the Song dynasty faced significant military threats from the Khitan and Jurchen tribes, which led to the loss of some territories.

Cultural and Intellectual Achievements: Both dynasties made significant contributions to Chinese culture and intellectual development. However, the Tang dynasty is often regarded as a "Golden Age" of Chinese literature, poetry, and art. In contrast, the Song dynasty is known for its contributions to science and technology, including the development of movable type printing, gunpowder, and the compass.

Overall, the Tang and Song dynasties had significant differences in terms of territory, capital city, economy, military power, and cultural achievements.

Answer: Brainliest?

Explanation:

The source shown in the image goes against the New Deal for several reasons:

The source depicts a man labeled as "big business" standing over a small man labeled as "taxpayer." This image implies that big business has more power and influence than the common taxpayer, which goes against the New Deal's efforts to redistribute power and wealth more evenly throughout society.

The caption "Can you spare a dime?" implies that the small taxpayer is asking for a handout from big business, which goes against the New Deal's emphasis on providing social welfare programs such as Social Security, unemployment insurance, and minimum wage laws to protect workers and ensure they receive fair pay.

The image's use of the word "dole" also implies that the small taxpayer is asking for a handout, which goes against the New Deal's goal of providing a safety net for those who are struggling and need assistance.

The image's depiction of big business as a large, menacing figure and the small taxpayer as a weak and powerless figure reinforces the idea that the wealthy and powerful are the only ones who can provide assistance, which goes against the New Deal's emphasis on government intervention and public programs to address social and economic issues.

The image also implies that the government is not capable of providing assistance to the small taxpayer, which goes against the New Deal's efforts to expand the role of government in providing social welfare programs and regulating the economy.

The use of the term "cure-all" suggests that the New Deal's programs were seen as a panacea that could solve all social and economic problems, which is a misrepresentation of the New Deal's goals and achievements.

The image implies that the New Deal's programs were ineffective and a waste of taxpayer money, which is a misrepresentation of the New Deal's successes in providing relief, recovery, and reform during the Great Depression.

Overall, the image reinforces negative stereotypes about government intervention and social welfare programs, which goes against the New Deal's efforts to promote social and economic justice for all Americans.

Pakistan did not support the Taliban during the Cold War, but it did provide support to mujahideen groups that were fighting against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan during the 1980s. The support provided by Pakistan and other countries to the mujahideen had both short-term and long-term ramifications.

In the short term, the support provided by Pakistan and other countries helped the mujahideen to inflict significant losses on the Soviet Union and its Afghan allies, ultimately leading to the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989.

However, in the long term, the support for the mujahideen had unintended consequences, including the rise of extremist groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The Taliban emerged in the 1990s as a powerful force that was able to take control of Afghanistan and establish a repressive regime. Al-Qaeda, which had originally been formed to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, later became a global terrorist organization that carried out attacks against the United States and other countries.

Pakistan's support for the mujahideen also had domestic ramifications. The influx of weapons and fighters into Pakistan helped to fuel sectarian and ethnic conflicts within the country, and some of the mujahideen fighters who had received training and support from Pakistan went on to become leaders of extremist groups that continue to pose a threat to Pakistan today.

Failure to report background changes within 30 days, as required by section 1729.2 of the California Insurance Code, may lead to disciplinary actions, such as fines or license suspension.

Not reporting significant background changes within the stipulated 30 days may result in formal disciplinary action against the licensee or applicant.

This is mandated by section 1729.2 of the California Insurance Code to ensure transparency and compliance with regulations.

Potential consequences of non-compliance include fines, suspension of the license, denial of a license application, restrictions on the license, or even revocation of the license. It is crucial for individuals to adhere to this requirement to maintain their licensure in good standing.

For more such questions on disciplinary actions, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28818118

#SPJ11

Explanation:

based on this telegraph, how were relations between Austria Hungary and Romania during this time

A wealthy business owner may oppose socialism because socialism is a political and economic system that aims to redistribute wealth and resources more equally among all members of society.

This means that under a socialist system, individuals or businesses that have accumulated significant wealth and resources may be required to share or give up some of their wealth to support the needs of the broader community. As a result, a wealthy business owner who has worked hard to accumulate their wealth may feel that socialism undermines their efforts and diminishes the incentive to work hard and innovate. Additionally, some business owners may believe that socialism leads to inefficiencies, stifles innovation and creativity, and ultimately harms economic growth.

Furthermore, some wealthy business owners may view socialism as a threat to their individual freedoms and property rights, as it often involves increased government intervention in the economy and greater regulation of private enterprise. They may argue that a free market system with minimal government intervention is a better approach to promoting economic growth and individual liberty.

Learn more about resources here:

https://brainly.com/question/28605667

#SPJ11

Option (d), According to Plutarch, Cleopatra was a fluent speaker of Roman, Egyptian, Ethiopian, Trogodyte, as well as the languages of the Hebrews, Arabs, Syrians, Medes, and Parthians in addition to her own Greek.

This fictitious Cleopatra satisfies both Plutarch's audience, who was familiar with the character, and Plutarch himself, whose aim in writing was to explain the impenetrable: how a man of Antony's potential grandeur could be forced to renounce all the alternatives that life offered.

Cleopatra VII was the only member of her dynasty who was fluent in ancient Egyptian and could read hieroglyphs. Besides from classical Greek, she was also proficient in the languages spoken by the Parthians, Jews, Medes, Syrians, Ethiopians, Arabs, and Syrians. It is a well-known fact that Cleopatra VII regularly stopped by an out-of-date laboratory.

Learn more about Cleopatra: https://brainly.com/question/22673346

#SPJ1

A salon is a gathering of people held by a host. These gatherings often consciously followed Horace's definition of the aims of poetry, "either to please or to educate" (Latin: aut delectare aut prodesse).

Option (b), President Johnson carried out the Lincoln rebuilding plan, but he forbade the whole Southern aristocracy from rejoining the union.

The main difference between Lincoln's and Johnson's reconstruction plans was the post-Civil War rights to freedom. Despite the fact that Lincoln wanted to guarantee rights, such as the ability to vote, for individuals who had formerly been slaves, Johnson's plan did not meet these requirements.

Johnson advised the Southern states to make the best decision for themselves. He also thought that African Americans were unable to manage their own life. In his perspective, African-Americans did not deserve the right to vote.

Learn more about Johnson's reconstruction plans: https://brainly.com/question/11736488

#SPJ1

Answer:

Federalism limits government by creating two sovereign powers—the national government and state governments—thereby restraining the influence of both. Separation of powers imposes internal limits by dividing government against itself, giving different branches separate functions and forcing them to share power.

Answer: Superior

Explanation:

As known as 3 branches help each other they mention the superior.

Answer:

African American Society

Explanation:

The society that experienced unique challenges with labor during the transition from slavery to freedom was the African American society in the United States.

Answer:

Obama became the first African American to be elected to the presidency, as well as being only the third sitting United States senator elected president, joining Warren G. Harding and John F. Kennedy.

It was the fourth of five American presidential elections, and the first since 1888, in which the winning candidate lost the popular vote, and is considered one of the closest U.S. presidential elections, with long-standing controversy about the result.

Answer: The answer is D, the establishment of pro-Soviet governments in Eastern Europe.

Explanation:  Winston Churchill was describing the establishment of pro-Soviet governments in Eastern Europe as an "iron curtain" falling across Europe. This term was used in a speech delivered by Churchill in Fulton, Missouri, on March 5, 1946, in which he warned of the dangers posed by Soviet expansionism and the need for a strong Western response to this threat. Churchill's speech marked the beginning of the Cold War and became a famous and influential call to arms against Soviet aggression.

Prohibition Accomplish made the sale of alcohol illegal in the United States.

The option (A) is correct.

With the eighteenth amendment done to the Constitution in 1917, the assembling, dealing, and transportation inside and from the US were precluded by regulation. This correction became effective in 1919. The US Congress accepted that the disallowance of liquor would get an adjustment of the general way of behaving of the multitude of Americans and the wrongdoing and debasement rates would descend.

As an impact, the public authority use on the support of detainment facilities, and the detainees would likewise descend. This restriction must be reclaimed as it acquired famous objection against its execution.

Learn more about Prohibition Accomplish:

https://brainly.com/question/20374739

#SPJ1

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

What did Prohibition accomplish? Check all that apply.

(A) It made the sale of alcohol illegal in the United States.

(B) It directly promoted women’s rights and equality.

(C) It brought about the repeal of the 18th Amendment.

(D) It helped bring about the end of the temperance movement.

(E) It led to an increase in crime and corruption across the country.

(F) It resulted in the establishment of speakeasies and bootlegging.

Answer:

Explanation:

the northern boundary of Oregon was the latitude line of 54 degrees, 40 minutes. "Fifty-four forty or fight!" was the popular slogan that led Polk to victory against all odds. Oregon City, along the banks of the Willamette River, the final stop along the Oregon Trail as it appeared in 1848.

Answer:

Its A

Explanation:

just did the test

Answer:

President John F. Kennedy and Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev had vastly different objectives and priorities, which influenced their interpretations of the Bay of Pigs invasion.

Kennedy's primary objective was to prevent the spread of communism and to establish the United States as the world leader in the fight against it. He believed that the Bay of Pigs invasion would help achieve this objective by overthrowing the communist regime of Fidel Castro in Cuba. However, the invasion failed, and Kennedy's administration was widely criticized for its role in the operation.

Khrushchev, on the other hand, saw the Bay of Pigs invasion as an opportunity to strengthen Soviet influence in Cuba and undermine American attempts to remove Castro from power. The Soviet Union had been providing military and economic assistance to Cuba, and Khrushchev saw the failed invasion as evidence that the United States was unable to carry out its objectives in the region.

As a result of their different objectives, Kennedy and Khrushchev had very different interpretations of the Bay of Pigs invasion. Kennedy viewed it as a setback in the fight against communism, while Khrushchev saw it as a victory for the Soviet Union and a sign of American weakness. This demonstrates how different perspectives and objectives can lead to vastly different interpretations of the same historical event.

Answer:

The Tang Dynasty lasted from 608-907 CE. During this dynasty, China grew to be the biggest country in the world. It included most of the territory of present-day China, Vietnam, and lots of Central Asia as a long way as jap Kazakhstan. During his time, the first complete crook code used to be created. Literary flourished, and Chinese poetry was once at its peak. The world's earliest dated printed e-book additionally got here from this Dynasty. An accelerated structure of gunpowder and porcelain used to be manufactured. Their porcelain used to be shipped off to Islamic land, and extraordinarily praised there.

Head to this source for more info: https://learnodo-newtonic.com/tang-dynasty-achievements

If you feel my answer is wrong you can tell me to edit it or you can report it

I honestly hope this helps <333

Answer:

Fully blockade all Southern coasts. This strategy, known as the Anaconda Plan, would eliminate the possibility of Confederate help from abroad. Control the Mississippi River.

The outcome of the Second World War had a profound impact on United States foreign policy between 1945 and 1965. The war marked the emergence of the United States as a global superpower, and the nation's role in the postwar world would be shaped by a series of key events and decisions.

One of the most significant changes in U.S. foreign policy was the shift toward a policy of containment. This policy, articulated by George F. Kennan in 1947, called for the United States to prevent the spread of communism around the world. The policy led to a series of interventions in countries such as Korea and Vietnam, as the United States sought to contain the influence of communist regimes.

Another major shift in U.S. foreign policy was the development of a system of alliances and treaties designed to promote stability and security in the postwar world. The United States played a leading role in the formation of NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which served as a bulwark against Soviet expansion in Europe. The United States also entered into a series of alliances and agreements in Asia, including the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and the Manila Pact.

The outcome of the Second World War also had a significant impact on U.S. economic policy. The United States emerged from the war as the world's dominant economic power, and the nation's leaders sought to promote economic growth and prosperity both at home and abroad. The Marshall Plan, which provided economic aid to Europe in the aftermath of the war, was a key element of this policy, as was the creation of institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.

In conclusion, the outcome of the Second World War had a profound impact on U.S. foreign policy between 1945 and 1965. The emergence of the United States as a global superpower led to a shift toward a policy of containment, the development of a system of alliances and treaties, and a focus on promoting economic growth and prosperity both at home and abroad. These changes would shape U.S. foreign policy for decades to come, as the nation continued to play a leading role in world affairs.

Answer:

The founder was Osman Gazi

hope this helps

Option (d), The Union sought to take control of Richmond, the Confederate capital, by the end of 1863.

Regardless of its political stance, the Confederate States Army would have protected it at all costs since it was a vital supply and armament source for the war effort as well as the terminus of five railways.

Fighting broke out between Union and Confederate forces in Chancellorsville, Virginia, south of Fredericksburg, in late April and early May 1863. The Rebel fighters were attacked by an army of more than 60,000 warriors from the Rebels. Confederate troops lost a lot of men but nevertheless prevailed in the conflict.

The Union's military plan extended beyond simple reunification and included the abolition of slavery as a component. The South had to be invaded by the Union, who had to subsequently defeat the Confederate armies and seize control of the region to bring about emancipation. Early in the Civil War, the conflict's political goals were mostly constrained to military ones.

Learn more about abolition of slavery: https://brainly.com/question/30675047

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

By the end of 1863, the Union wanted to:

A. capture the Confederate president Jefferson Davis.

B. capture all Confederate troops in the North.

C. capture all Confederate spies in the North.

D. capture the Confederate capital of Richmond.

India is suffering from some of the most severe effects of the climate catastrophe, from heat waves decimating crop output to torrential rains producing flooding that submerges entire communities. India only contributes about 7% of global emissions while making up little more than 17% of the world's population.

To learn more about climate, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/7160472