Answer:
A centralized government hands over supreme political authority to a central body or small group of individuals, which is responsible for ensuring the proper function of the economy and all other governing bodies.
A resident of Maine is accused of murder and requests a grand jury indictment; however, the Maine legislature has recently passed a law doing away with grand jury trials, even when requested. The defendant is eventually found guilty and appeals his case all the way to the US Supreme Court.
Under selective incorporation, what is the most likely result of this Supreme Court case?
A) The Supreme Court will likely find against the state of Maine because the rights “retained by the people” mentioned in the Ninth Amendment would be applied through the doctrine of selective incorporation.
B) The Supreme Court will likely find in favor of the state of Maine because the 10th Amendment’s guarantee of states’ rights could be applied through selective incorporation.
C) The Supreme Court will likely find in favor of the state of Maine, because the 11th Amendment’s limitation on judicial power could be included in the doctrine of selected incorporation.
D)The Supreme Court will likely find against the state of Maine, since the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to indictment by a grand jury, and no state may deprive a citizen of this right.
Under the doctrine of selective incorporation, the most likely result of this Supreme Court case between a resident of Maine and the State of Maine is B) The Supreme Court will likely ...
The doctrine of selective incorporation allows states to incorporate the Grand Jury trial. Since Maine does not consider the Grand Jury trial necessary, the state has the backing of the law to end Grand Jury trials.
Thus, the Supreme Court will find the case in favor of the state of Maine.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/17550197
Directions: Read the three Supreme Court case scenarios below in the left hand column. In the right hand column, jot down which constitutional amendment you think this case was about, and explain your reasoning.
SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the US) Case
Constitutional Amendment
Mapp v. Ohio (1957): In May 1957, three police officers arrived at Dollree Mapp’s home after having received a tip that a fugitive had hidden there. Mapp, who had phoned her attorney, refused to admit the police officers. Three hours later, they knocked on the door, and when Mapp did not immediately answer, they forced the door open and entered. Mapp demanded to see a search warrant. One of the officers held up a piece of paper, claiming it was the warrant. After a scuffle, the officers handcuffed Mapp. The police then began to search the house. They did not find a fugitive in the house; however, in the course of their search they turned up some material they deemed obscene. Mapp was charged and eventually convicted of having offensive books and pictures in her possession.
Engel v. Vitale (1962): In 1951 the New York State Board of Regents, which supervises the state’s public school system, approved a brief prayer at the start of each day. The prayer read: “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our Country.” School districts were not required to use the prayer, and students were not required to recite it. In 1958, the New Hyde Park school board adopted the prayer and directed that it be recited each day in every class, although students could be excused from reciting it. Steven Engel, the parent of two children in the New Hyde Park schools, objected to this practice and asked a state court to order the prayer dropped.
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969): Throughout the 1960s, television broadcasts carried graphic images of the Vietnam War. In December of 1965, John Tinker, his sister Mary Beth, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt decided to protest the war. They planned to wear black armbands to their schools in Des Moines, Iowa. When the school board learned of their plans, it adopted a policy that banned the wearing of armbands. Any students who violated this policy would be suspended. Several students, including the Tinkers, went ahead with their protest. The students were suspended when they refused to remove their armbands.
The cases mentioned are related to:
The First Amendment (Engel v Vitale, and Tinker v. Des Moines)The Fourth Amendment (Mapp v. Ohio)Mapp v. Ohio (1957): This case is related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because Dollree Mapp was the victim of an illegal police search. They illegally forced the door of her house and entered without her consent.
Additionally, she was detained arbitrarily for having objects considered obscene. This case is related to the Fourth Amendment because this amendment establishes the protection of citizens against arbitrary searches and apprehensions.
On the other hand, Engel v. Vitale: This case is related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution because it prohibits the creation of any norm that limits or prevents the free practice of freedom.
In this case, the New York State Board of Regents was violating this amendment because they approved a rule to implement prayer in public schools which affected students who did not have religious beliefs or those who did not practice Christianity.
Tinker v. Des Moines: This case is related to the First Amendment because Moines institution violates the First Amendment because some of its students were making use of their right to free expression wanted to show their rejection of the Vietnam War through a bracelet, and the school prohibited it. Based on the foregoing, it can be inferred that the institution violated the First Amendment by prohibiting free expression for students.
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/13276616
Which of the following objects absorbs the most light?
Answer:
ur mom lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol
What are the two theories about the relationship between Emperor Honorius and the barbarians? Which theory did Procopius believe, and why?
Theories claim that when Emperor Honorius left the palace when he saw that the barbarians were approaching and that he paid the barbarians to attack his kingdom. Procopius believed more in the theory that he abandoned the castle and fled.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Procopius claims that barbarian attacks were not a great concern for Emperor Honorius.That's because he believed his realm was too far away from where the attacks were taking place.However, when the barbarians began to approach, he began to fear a possible attack.There is a theory that when the barbarians got too close, he fled far away. Procopius believes that this theory is the truest and closest to reality.Another theory claims that he paid the barbarians to attack his kingdom, as this attack would fight rebellions from his subjects.Procopius does not believe in this latest theory and there is not even evidence that it could be real.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/3436861?referrer=searchResults
What is it like to live in a democracy
Answer:
it's ok
Explanation:
you have a president
Which marked the north and south boundaries of the Louisiana Purchase?
Atlantic Ocean and Spanish Territory
Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean
Atlantic Ocean and Oregon Territory
Gulf of Mexico and British Territory
the topic is about martin luther king jr
what does adam smith say the purpose of the mercantile system is?
Answer: Adam Smith coined the term “mercantile system” to describe the system of political economy that sought to enrich the country by restraining imports and encouraging exports. This system dominated Western European economic thought and policies from the sixteenth to the late eighteenth centuries.
Explanation:
What is something that prevents people from voting in elections?
Select All the correct answers
In what two ways did President Franklin D. Roosevelt play a role in the Bonus Army marches?
He offered them the opportunity to enlist in the Civilian Conservation Corps.
He decreased the benefits that veterans were receiving.
He ordered the army to have the veterans violently removed from Washington
He signed a bill authorizing early payment to veterans.
He provided food and shelter to the veterans during their marches.
¿Cuáles de los siguientes avances tomaron prestados los europeos de China?
Answer:
Europeans borrowed the following two from China; (i) Gunpowder. (ii) Square sails. The gunpowder in China was used for fireworks however, Europeans used it for military purposes.
Los europeos tomaron prestados los siguientes dos de China; (i) Pólvora. (ii) Velas cuadradas. La pólvora en China se usó para fuegos artificiales, sin embargo, los europeos la usaron con fines militares.